Lil' Help--Pull-Pull Steering Linkage
#1
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hi,
I'm trying to demonstrate to a certain engineer that a rigid pull-pull steering setup (3mm pushrods) is problematic when the geometry isn't exactly symmetrical. In this case, the servo output shaft is offset from the center of the strut pivot point AND the steering arm is forward of the strut pivot. Additionally, the span of the steering arm is shorter than the span of the servo arm. His belief is that the fact that everything is on ball joints mitigates all this. That's not correct.
Anyway, I wonder if anyone has any links to any videos showing a pull-pull setup where one cable is going slack upon deflection? Or maybe someone could post a clip of such a setup if you have one? I'm in Asia right now and don't have access to my own stuff, but I kinda need to short-circuit this issue for this fella before he goes into production with this built-in servo-burner-upper.
I'm trying to demonstrate to a certain engineer that a rigid pull-pull steering setup (3mm pushrods) is problematic when the geometry isn't exactly symmetrical. In this case, the servo output shaft is offset from the center of the strut pivot point AND the steering arm is forward of the strut pivot. Additionally, the span of the steering arm is shorter than the span of the servo arm. His belief is that the fact that everything is on ball joints mitigates all this. That's not correct.
Anyway, I wonder if anyone has any links to any videos showing a pull-pull setup where one cable is going slack upon deflection? Or maybe someone could post a clip of such a setup if you have one? I'm in Asia right now and don't have access to my own stuff, but I kinda need to short-circuit this issue for this fella before he goes into production with this built-in servo-burner-upper.
#3
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes, indeed. But THIS time, I'd just like to circumvent all that. Every once in a while, we gotta be that parent that prevents the child from touching the hot stove. So... got anything for me (besides that nugget of Yoda-ish wisdom)?
![Wink](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#4
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A little sketch of the setup would help. It doesn't have to be precise. It sounds like a double push-pull system instead of pull-pull. As you stated, symmetry is the key. What kind of engineer is he?
Last edited by causeitflies; 05-23-2023 at 09:25 AM.
#5
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_vendor.png)
My Feedback: (11)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Correct me if I'm wrong (i'm not an engineer) but rigid means push/pull correct? Pull pull would be wires not pushrods each putting tension on when it pulls. I'd think the easiest way to eliminate binding would be to use 1 pushrod otherwise anything less than perfect geometry would cause binding.
#6
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I put this in CAD for you and it shows the geometry problem well.
Setup:
4" servo arm
2" control horn
18" wires
When both arms are horizontal, hole-to-hole lengths are 18" (this is set by the wire length). When you turn the servo arm 20°, one side remains 18" (set by the wire in tension), but the opposing side increases to 18.02". The reason for this is because of the pivot arm length. If the arms are the same length, then they will remain parallel through all angles. If the arms are different lengths, they will not remain parallel through their travel and this will result in slack on the non-tension side
![](https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcuniverse.com-vbulletin/465x705/2023_05_23_11_59_48_solidworks_premium_2018_sp5_0_sketch1_of_part7__8cb1c5f9615aa369d08d3d633c2c447ea7afd4fa.jpg)
![](https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcuniverse.com-vbulletin/440x735/2023_05_23_12_00_11_solidworks_premium_2018_sp5_0_sketch1_of_part7__f648518206f20a6b011ee0f8b571ac9980617591.jpg)
Setup:
4" servo arm
2" control horn
18" wires
When both arms are horizontal, hole-to-hole lengths are 18" (this is set by the wire length). When you turn the servo arm 20°, one side remains 18" (set by the wire in tension), but the opposing side increases to 18.02". The reason for this is because of the pivot arm length. If the arms are the same length, then they will remain parallel through all angles. If the arms are different lengths, they will not remain parallel through their travel and this will result in slack on the non-tension side
![](https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcuniverse.com-vbulletin/465x705/2023_05_23_11_59_48_solidworks_premium_2018_sp5_0_sketch1_of_part7__8cb1c5f9615aa369d08d3d633c2c447ea7afd4fa.jpg)
![](https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcuniverse.com-vbulletin/440x735/2023_05_23_12_00_11_solidworks_premium_2018_sp5_0_sketch1_of_part7__f648518206f20a6b011ee0f8b571ac9980617591.jpg)
The following users liked this post:
YellowAircraft (05-23-2023)
The following users liked this post:
YellowAircraft (05-23-2023)
#8
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
My Feedback: (15)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i guess, in order to be certain,
is this one of those set ups where the steering servo "rides" through the retraction motion with the gear leg?
in that situation, i can see a rigid dual push/pull being able to work with minimal binding at the ends of the throws. probably produce excess current draw and most likely premature servo failure. with short links and the arms kept closer to the same length, it could work, for a while.
is this one of those set ups where the steering servo "rides" through the retraction motion with the gear leg?
in that situation, i can see a rigid dual push/pull being able to work with minimal binding at the ends of the throws. probably produce excess current draw and most likely premature servo failure. with short links and the arms kept closer to the same length, it could work, for a while.
#9
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yeah, you're correct. Double push-pull. Aero-Engr. What's not clear from the photo is that the servo output shaft is also offset from center relative to the center of the strut pin.
![](https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcuniverse.com-vbulletin/920x2000/screenshot_20230524_054925_discord_bc978951e36fbe067e3e4ad12b6c680d7c8652c1.jpg)
Last edited by YellowAircraft; 05-23-2023 at 01:57 PM.
#10
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Correct me if I'm wrong (i'm not an engineer) but rigid means push/pull correct? Pull pull would be wires not pushrods each putting tension on when it pulls. I'd think the easiest way to eliminate binding would be to use 1 pushrod otherwise anything less than perfect geometry would cause binding.
Sadly, the problem I'm trying to solve isn't how to eliminate the natural binding this asymmetry is causing. It's trying to convince the boss that the problem exists.
#11
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_member.png)
My Feedback: (15)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
if he will believe in electronic measurements:
you can put an amp meter on the steering servo and show him the amp load increase as the system is moved about.
how it stays relatively constant around center and climbs as the deflection increases
you can put an amp meter on the steering servo and show him the amp load increase as the system is moved about.
how it stays relatively constant around center and climbs as the deflection increases
Last edited by mongo; 05-23-2023 at 07:50 PM. Reason: i HATE auto correct