Too Much?
#5

My Feedback: (24)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Daytona Beach
Sorry, was thinking Facet, duh [X(].... Dont think you can use 750 on the AV8R, not designed for that much weight or thrust back there.... The DV8R was designed for just this very reason...
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Shok,
The 750 is too large and too heavy for the AV8R. We do NOT have a larger AV8R but we are nearing the release of the DV8R (see Below). This model is much larger than the AV8R and designed specifically for the 18 to 28 pound class turbines. Wingspan - 88 inches length - 94 inches with an all up weight of about 22 pounds. Full retracts all around designed specifically for this model. There will be full details on our site (www.flypcm.com) in just a few weeks.
The models (AV8R and DV8R) are shown in the diagram at scale relative size to give you an idea as to the DV8Rs mass.
The 750 is too large and too heavy for the AV8R. We do NOT have a larger AV8R but we are nearing the release of the DV8R (see Below). This model is much larger than the AV8R and designed specifically for the 18 to 28 pound class turbines. Wingspan - 88 inches length - 94 inches with an all up weight of about 22 pounds. Full retracts all around designed specifically for this model. There will be full details on our site (www.flypcm.com) in just a few weeks.
The models (AV8R and DV8R) are shown in the diagram at scale relative size to give you an idea as to the DV8Rs mass.
#9

My Feedback: (13)
ORIGINAL: fly109
We do NOT have a larger AV8R but we are nearing the release of the DV8R (see Below). This model is much larger than the AV8R and designed specifically for the 18 to 28 pound class turbines
We do NOT have a larger AV8R but we are nearing the release of the DV8R (see Below). This model is much larger than the AV8R and designed specifically for the 18 to 28 pound class turbines
Is the DV8R expected to have the slow flight / short field performance of say a Boomerang or even the KingCat?
I have a Simjet 2300 (25 pound) on the way, but only have a short field near.
Thanks,
Edgar
#14
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (28)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Heath,
TX
I also talked to Bruce Tharp at the SW AMA show about his Reaction 54.
I liked it alot but I'm not thrilled with the engine position. Plus man that is a huge plane. The wing cord is huge.
He had a Ram 500 on his, I asked about a 17# engine and he really didn't want to hear that. He said a 12# engine was more then enough.
I think a 17# engine would be right at home in that thing.
I liked it alot but I'm not thrilled with the engine position. Plus man that is a huge plane. The wing cord is huge.
He had a Ram 500 on his, I asked about a 17# engine and he really didn't want to hear that. He said a 12# engine was more then enough.
I think a 17# engine would be right at home in that thing.
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Edgar,
Depending on the power you choose the DV8R will have a very short grass field take off capability, after all it really boils down to weight v thrust and lift. I hope to be done with my prototype within two weeks and I will let you know it flight envelope then. I expect to have parity with those other models in slow flight and take off distances.
As far as the DV8R looking like that other model, I guess that is true in as much as an F - 18 looks like an F - 14 to the uneducated due to the twin tail design. It is a little like suggesting that the Airbus looks mysteriously like a Boeing. Of course it does because there intended purposes are the same. But the DV8R was drawn by me as an extension and refinement of my AV8R almost a year and a half ago - I had not seen that other model. Also if you look at a three view of both you would have a much better chance to see how different they are. My AV8R was drawn as a twin tail over 3 years ago now and has proven a good way to put the engine where it is . If you think about it for more that a few seconds there are only so many ways to put a jet blast of 650 degrees or so down the centerline of a model. There is a reason most sport jets follow just a few current examples. Also should you ever see the two together you will see quite a bit of difference in many aspects.
Depending on the power you choose the DV8R will have a very short grass field take off capability, after all it really boils down to weight v thrust and lift. I hope to be done with my prototype within two weeks and I will let you know it flight envelope then. I expect to have parity with those other models in slow flight and take off distances.
As far as the DV8R looking like that other model, I guess that is true in as much as an F - 18 looks like an F - 14 to the uneducated due to the twin tail design. It is a little like suggesting that the Airbus looks mysteriously like a Boeing. Of course it does because there intended purposes are the same. But the DV8R was drawn by me as an extension and refinement of my AV8R almost a year and a half ago - I had not seen that other model. Also if you look at a three view of both you would have a much better chance to see how different they are. My AV8R was drawn as a twin tail over 3 years ago now and has proven a good way to put the engine where it is . If you think about it for more that a few seconds there are only so many ways to put a jet blast of 650 degrees or so down the centerline of a model. There is a reason most sport jets follow just a few current examples. Also should you ever see the two together you will see quite a bit of difference in many aspects.





