dumb tacho question
#1
Thread Starter

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: AdelaideSouth Australia, AUSTRALIA
hi all,
if i were to tacho a ducted fan impellor, that has x number of blades, and i use a tacho and set the tacho to read y number of blades, how do i convert the reading properly?
i am confused.
i thought it might be
[reading x (Y/X)]
this appears to be incorrect, but i'm unsure.
the problem is that when the tacho reads a two blade setup, whenever two blades cross the optical sensor, it registers a rev right?, so theoretically a 7 blade impellor registers 3.5 rpm per rev when measuring on the 2 blade setting....? right?...
so 30k revs in this instance would read as 3000 x 3.5 = 10500.
is this correct?.. or is it [reading x (Y/(X-1))] is it only the 6 blades inbetween the 7th?, or does it include the 7th, so effectively being 4 rpm per rev.
it appears to be picking up all the blades on my fan, as the numbers are repeatable.
Tim.
if i were to tacho a ducted fan impellor, that has x number of blades, and i use a tacho and set the tacho to read y number of blades, how do i convert the reading properly?
i am confused.
i thought it might be
[reading x (Y/X)]
this appears to be incorrect, but i'm unsure.
the problem is that when the tacho reads a two blade setup, whenever two blades cross the optical sensor, it registers a rev right?, so theoretically a 7 blade impellor registers 3.5 rpm per rev when measuring on the 2 blade setting....? right?...
so 30k revs in this instance would read as 3000 x 3.5 = 10500.
is this correct?.. or is it [reading x (Y/(X-1))] is it only the 6 blades inbetween the 7th?, or does it include the 7th, so effectively being 4 rpm per rev.
it appears to be picking up all the blades on my fan, as the numbers are repeatable.
Tim.
#3
Thread Starter

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: AdelaideSouth Australia, AUSTRALIA
G'day Gray,
You know what, i just came in from the shed after doing just that!
it's gotta make more sense to get confidence in the contrast eh?.... i told you it was a dumb question.
i feel foolish, as i do know of others who do it this way...
the thing is that i was able to successfully tach other rotors using this method.
there is something about the data that doesnt make sense though, as i have three engines of sizes small, medium and large, and two rotor types, and unless it is a function of the rotor load curve versus engine power curve, then the numbers dont make sense.
i'll give it another go tomorrow.
Happy New Year!
Tim.
You know what, i just came in from the shed after doing just that!
it's gotta make more sense to get confidence in the contrast eh?.... i told you it was a dumb question.
i feel foolish, as i do know of others who do it this way...
the thing is that i was able to successfully tach other rotors using this method.
there is something about the data that doesnt make sense though, as i have three engines of sizes small, medium and large, and two rotor types, and unless it is a function of the rotor load curve versus engine power curve, then the numbers dont make sense.
i'll give it another go tomorrow.
Happy New Year!
Tim.



