new roo? Kangaroo 2??
#11

A few guys here fly it with at 3000 without any mods to the Roo II.
But they take care not to overstress the airframe in flight. I dont think it will hold up to level flight at 450km/h and if you just yank the elevator to full up position for eksample
I saw a Roo II selfdestruct in midair last year. The aluminium wingspar had riped through the upper surface of the fuselage.
My Roo II had a Sonic 120, and it had plenty of power........until I dumbthumbed it and it went in.
But they take care not to overstress the airframe in flight. I dont think it will hold up to level flight at 450km/h and if you just yank the elevator to full up position for eksample
I saw a Roo II selfdestruct in midair last year. The aluminium wingspar had riped through the upper surface of the fuselage.
My Roo II had a Sonic 120, and it had plenty of power........until I dumbthumbed it and it went in.
#12

My Feedback: (2)
I fly Roo2 with a TJT 3000 and this is WAY more power than the plane really needs. Good throttle management is what is needed to make sure you don't rip the thing apart in midair!! 
http://www.tjt.bz/newsdetail.php?news=15&page=24
Myles
TJT Canada

http://www.tjt.bz/newsdetail.php?news=15&page=24
Myles
TJT Canada
#13
I would suggest the Rookie over the Roo (also www.composite-arf.com)
it flies A LOT better and has thrust vectoring included as an option. The engine is centerline with the fuse for better flight characteristics, and is also enclosed, making it look a lot better than the paraplegic looking Roo (or Roo2)
Wojtek
it flies A LOT better and has thrust vectoring included as an option. The engine is centerline with the fuse for better flight characteristics, and is also enclosed, making it look a lot better than the paraplegic looking Roo (or Roo2)
Wojtek
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (18)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bakersfield,
CA
ORIGINAL: wojtek
I would suggest the Rookie over the Roo (also www.composite-arf.com)
it flies A LOT better and has thrust vectoring included as an option. The engine is centerline with the fuse for better flight characteristics, and is also enclosed, making it look a lot better than the paraplegic looking Roo (or Roo2)
Wojtek
I would suggest the Rookie over the Roo (also www.composite-arf.com)
it flies A LOT better and has thrust vectoring included as an option. The engine is centerline with the fuse for better flight characteristics, and is also enclosed, making it look a lot better than the paraplegic looking Roo (or Roo2)
Wojtek
#17
I have a ROO with a Simjet 3000 that delivers 14,5 kg of thrust. (127 000 rpm) And thats why they call me the Rocket Man. But it flyes like a dream. You can just set the turbine down to low position and you should have no problems. The Simjet 3000 is such a nice engine for so many different planes so why buy anything smaller now, and then you might need a 3000 to your next project?
Christian
Christian





