burning question
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Jacksonville,
FL
Hi guys is it possible to install working after burners on turbines ? If so how is it done ? what is needed to complete to complete this task ?
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Jacksonville,
FL
pretty much yeah, it would be cool though. check out this site Micro jet engineering click on the research and development the pics shows a nice " burn "
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Apple Valley,
CA
Originally posted by Guardian
Hi guys is it possible to install working after burners on turbines ? If so how is it done ? what is needed to complete to complete this task ?
Hi guys is it possible to install working after burners on turbines ? If so how is it done ? what is needed to complete to complete this task ?
if you go to the Pratt and Whitney and GE web sites you can see cutaways of engines with ABs attacthed to them-all you need is the tail pipe-fuel injector spray ring-igniter-(spark plug-glow plug)-flame holder-a pump to pump the fuel in and when you get it all done and tested so it works like you want-bring that dude out here to Rabbit Dry lake and test fly it!
Jackjet
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: oberndorf, AUSTRIA
two years ago, jet meeting rosental, i have seen turbo didis plane with a skypipe afterburner. it produced considerable more thrust with it, and the flame behind the thrust pipe was spectacular.
unfortunately the plane failed at take off, obviously because of disfunction of the combustion. it landed in the near field after take off.
as far as i know, an afterburner does not improve the performance of our planes, because the thrust/weight relationship is not good at all. in addition to this the extra tail pipe decreases thrust in the "non afterburner" mode. the fuel consumption is extraordinary too.
mec
unfortunately the plane failed at take off, obviously because of disfunction of the combustion. it landed in the near field after take off.
as far as i know, an afterburner does not improve the performance of our planes, because the thrust/weight relationship is not good at all. in addition to this the extra tail pipe decreases thrust in the "non afterburner" mode. the fuel consumption is extraordinary too.
mec




