Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
 Future of Jets >

Future of Jets

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Future of Jets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2005 | 04:59 PM
  #26  
TREADSTONE.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: U.K.U.K, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Future of Jets


ORIGINAL: mikehannah


..I have to question what the point would be of having them...

....Afterburner means more thrust, which means more fuel,

Mike
..Spot on Mike, there is no point of having them...not for us anyway.

Afterburners are a low pressure combustion system which puts more heat into the gas flow and provides a thrust boost.... but this thrust boost is Proportional to the square root of the temperature change...i.e you have to chuck bucketful's more fuel in..loadsa bucketfuls..


Old 03-28-2005 | 06:18 PM
  #27  
Zack Morris's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Rogate, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Future of Jets

You're probably right about the restrictions that would be slapped on us.

However, I make the claim in the interests of reproducing the realism of the original rather than wanting more power, more speed and more thrust to weight ratio all of which we can all agree are completely unnecessary with modern turbines.
Old 03-28-2005 | 07:27 PM
  #28  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default RE: Future of Jets

Personally I would just rather see the fuel effiency go way up!
Old 03-28-2005 | 09:33 PM
  #29  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Thurso, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Future of Jets

I agree I would like to see the fuel efficiency go way up.
The amount of fuel some of these jets take off with and the resulting wing loading is for me nothing short of frightening.
If we get the fuel down we can bring the take off wieght down which means less tarmac runway or and even your local grass field. ie you no longer have to trek to a specialist facility
The planes will be a more pleasant to fly and cheaper to run. Less fuel means less fire risk and everyone wins. The spiral goes in our favour.

Mike
( still hiding behind the sand bags for the flak)

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.