spoilerons?
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Montreal, CANADA
ok, i have some experience using flaperons (mixed with elev).... it works well, the only downside being a little mushy controls on landings
i wanted to use this type of a setup on my DF jet for obvious reasons (to slow it down on landings) BUT then i read a post about using spoilerons -being much better for landing a jet...... it seems that the jet lands much better in a "nose high" attitude due to the spoilerons (up 10 deg) and they slow the plane down....
can anyone explain to me why decreasing the wing lift would help landing the jet?
if someone uses this type of a setup pls let me know
thanks, Vasek
BTW am still searching for a set of plans for my BVM Ultra Viper... anyone?
i wanted to use this type of a setup on my DF jet for obvious reasons (to slow it down on landings) BUT then i read a post about using spoilerons -being much better for landing a jet...... it seems that the jet lands much better in a "nose high" attitude due to the spoilerons (up 10 deg) and they slow the plane down....
can anyone explain to me why decreasing the wing lift would help landing the jet?
if someone uses this type of a setup pls let me know
thanks, Vasek
BTW am still searching for a set of plans for my BVM Ultra Viper... anyone?
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
ORIGINAL: vasek
ok, i have some experience using flaperons (mixed with elev).... it works well, the only downside being a little mushy controls on landings
i wanted to use this type of a setup on my DF jet for obvious reasons (to slow it down on landings) BUT then i read a post about using spoilerons -being much better for landing a jet...... it seems that the jet lands much better in a "nose high" attitude due to the spoilerons (up 10 deg) and they slow the plane down....
can anyone explain to me why decreasing the wing lift would help landing the jet?
if someone uses this type of a setup pls let me know
ok, i have some experience using flaperons (mixed with elev).... it works well, the only downside being a little mushy controls on landings
i wanted to use this type of a setup on my DF jet for obvious reasons (to slow it down on landings) BUT then i read a post about using spoilerons -being much better for landing a jet...... it seems that the jet lands much better in a "nose high" attitude due to the spoilerons (up 10 deg) and they slow the plane down....
can anyone explain to me why decreasing the wing lift would help landing the jet?
if someone uses this type of a setup pls let me know
As Sean has pointed out, being able to carry power during the landing has definite advantages for turbine powered models - turbines tend to spool up much slower from idle than they do from e.g. 1/4 or 1/3 throttle - so if you can make your approach under higher power then you get a quicker response if & when you need to add more power (e.g. for a go-around).
A minor downside of putting the ailerons up is that this raises the stall speed - so if you are used to the stall speed of the model with flapperons, then you switch to putting the ailerons up rather than down, you should probably add a few knots safety factor until you get used to the new setup.
Gordon
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
ORIGINAL: vasek
Gordon, would the 10 deg up seem as a good starting point?
Gordon, would the 10 deg up seem as a good starting point?
#7
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Montreal, CANADA
Gordon, i did start my question in the aerodynamics forum but had no success there....
guess i'll have to experiment, i will try it on a Patriot first before trying it on my DF jet
thanx for helping,
vasek
guess i'll have to experiment, i will try it on a Patriot first before trying it on my DF jet
thanx for helping,
vasek




