in flight camera and transmitter
#3

My Feedback: (47)
I've used a wireless system from Boostervision (see [link=http://www.boostervision.com/boostervision/default.asp]here)[/link] in everything from a turbine A10X to a 3D-fun fly plane...easy to mount and works well. I have some awesome vids from this system (all recorded on VHS or I'd post here).
Unless you fly in close and tight, get the High Power system.
Barry
Unless you fly in close and tight, get the High Power system.
Barry
#7

My Feedback: (2)
What sorta video quality have you guys gotten with the range of transmitter signal output options? They say a 1/2 watt camera TX system will transmit up to 2 km, but are the 1000mW, diversity receivers, etc. options worth it? I'd like one for a jet, but I'm also looking at installing one on an arena blimp.
One highly recommended option is black widow video as I'm told, but in the past month I've sent Bill numerous emails for quotations I have yet to receive a single reply. The lack of response is a little surprising since he advertises a great deal...?
Kelly
One highly recommended option is black widow video as I'm told, but in the past month I've sent Bill numerous emails for quotations I have yet to receive a single reply. The lack of response is a little surprising since he advertises a great deal...?
Kelly
#8

My Feedback: (47)
The quality of the image on the Boostervision camera is just "OK", 300 lines resolution, I believe. I would suggest getting the high power transmitter and RX option. The camera is also sensitive to noise from the ECU, impacts image quality. Low power system range is 1000 feet at best and the high power unit maybe 1/2 mile at 400 ft altitude or so. I had a hard time maintaining a consistent image quality when doing 'hard' aerobatics and at low altitudes (under 200 feet or so).
I have since gone to a 'professional' 900 MHZ based system using a MaxStream transmitter and receiver attached to a Sony DVC and encoder. Not for the faint of wallet (total cost around $800) and weighs about a pound - but I've since flown it to 44,000 feet and Mach 2.1.
This also requires a ham license to operate, but the image quality is awesome.
I have since gone to a 'professional' 900 MHZ based system using a MaxStream transmitter and receiver attached to a Sony DVC and encoder. Not for the faint of wallet (total cost around $800) and weighs about a pound - but I've since flown it to 44,000 feet and Mach 2.1.
This also requires a ham license to operate, but the image quality is awesome.
#11

My Feedback: (2)
ORIGINAL: rorywquin
Be aware that Sandor (Digitech) has reported range / interference issues with some cameras causing crashes.
Be aware that Sandor (Digitech) has reported range / interference issues with some cameras causing crashes.
Kelly



