Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
 Too close for comfort ? >

Too close for comfort ?

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Too close for comfort ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2007 | 05:50 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Coventry, UNITED KINGDOM
Default Too close for comfort ?

Hi Guys.

I'm putting my old air start AMT Pegasus into my Boomerang XL.
As it's a heavy lump, so I'm positioning as far forward as I can to avoid excess lead in the nose.
Trouble is, there is only a 1" gap between the turbine and fuel tank.
Is this enough clearance for the turbine to breath properly ?

The tank is securely gripped by its neck and cannot move aft.

Thanks.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ig11338.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	59.1 KB
ID:	654218   Click image for larger version

Name:	Hc91687.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	59.0 KB
ID:	654219  
Old 04-01-2007 | 06:02 AM
  #2  
swissflyer's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 925
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: bellinzona, SWITZERLAND
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

run the turbine out of the model, on the bench and write down temperature, RPM, ...

and try to run her in the model and see if changes...

i think if she don't get enough air, she will run higher on temperature and not full round...

but from the images she looks very close to the tank..
Old 04-01-2007 | 07:09 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
From: wilkes barre, PA
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

Maybe you can use a different tank which will give you more room

Mark
Old 04-01-2007 | 07:26 AM
  #4  
IB
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: RAF Lincolnshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

I have a similar installation in my XL, though a little more distance, but the engine will draw in what it needs, it dos'nt have to be funnelled in. Try a before and after as has been suggested.

IB
Old 04-01-2007 | 07:26 AM
  #5  
Edgar Perez's Avatar
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,410
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Gurabo, PUERTO RICO (USA)
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

You may want to add 2-3 [link=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_duct]NACA ducts[/link] to the XL top section just forward of the turbine. Should help get more air to it.



Good luck,
Edgar
Old 04-01-2007 | 08:09 AM
  #6  
Skymac's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bowling Green, KY
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

From what I have been told, you only need 1.5 times the compressor area, and I would think by looking at the picture that it should not be a problem. I asked Dean Wichmann, pretaining to my JHH Panther as he put a Ram 500 in a JHH F-86. Check out jet hangars website and look at the pics in the turbine installation page.
Old 04-01-2007 | 10:09 AM
  #7  
seanreit's Avatar
My Feedback: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,434
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Cedar Park, TX
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

I don't think it's a problem either, the engine will take what it needs, and there is a lot of room there to get what it needs.

I wouldn't run it out of the airplane and get data personally, The engine doesn't draw from directly "forward" it draws from everywhere it needs to, including up down, and all around, even from behind the engine intake in the right configuration for that to happen.
Old 04-01-2007 | 10:49 AM
  #8  
yeahbaby's Avatar
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,564
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
From: FT Worth, TX
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

Spartan

I'm using an airstart olympus/AT450 and can attain proper CG w/o lead. I'm using (2) 3600 NiMh batts for the airborne system and a 2000 LiPo for the ECU.

I think you'll be ok with the required air for the engine. remember the engine is going to draw the air from wherever it can. the inlet system in the jet will provide plenty of air for it to draw from. However, if you're seeking smoother airflow to the face of the engine then consider moving the engine back slightly.

my engine inlet bellmouth bisects the front engine mounting former. i.e. front case fuel, air, propane fittings just barely reach the former.

enjoy

buck




ORIGINAL: Spartan Missile

Hi Guys.

I'm putting my old air start AMT Pegasus into my Boomerang XL.
As it's a heavy lump, so I'm positioning as far forward as I can to avoid excess lead in the nose.
Trouble is, there is only a 1" gap between the turbine and fuel tank.
Is this enough clearance for the turbine to breath properly ?

The tank is securely gripped by its neck and cannot move aft.

Thanks.

Old 04-01-2007 | 10:53 AM
  #9  
causeitflies's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,452
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
From: EASTERN OHIO
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

The shape of the bottle looks like it was made for feeding air to that turbine.[8D]
Old 04-01-2007 | 03:23 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

Spartan Missile,
You should have no problem with the turbine if you leave it where it is, but if you feel you must move it two or three centimetres back it will make virtually no difference to the CG.

Try it and check the CG by suspending the model from the bulkhead right in front of the turbine and you'll find moving it makes so little change to the CG position it has no effect on the XL.

Despite the turbine weight, it is so close to the CG point it hardly moves it. Maybe 3 or 4 MM.

I've tried numerous turbines and moved them fore and aft in my 3 XLs, and that's what I found.
Alan
Old 04-01-2007 | 06:26 PM
  #11  
Robrow's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Southport, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

If it were me I would increase the gap as much as practical. Sure, the engine will draw air from everywhere including behind BUT at high throttle settings you need a smooth flow from directly in front to avoid flameouts.

Hope that helps, Rob.
Old 04-02-2007 | 04:31 AM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Coventry, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Too close for comfort ?

Good morning Chaps, thanks all of you for the suggestions.

I forgot to mention that my XL is the older Mk 1 version, and I added some mesh on the intakes as a FOD guard. I might have to put some NACA slots on the turtle deck if the air intake is restricted. I think I would be better off with a FOD guard on the turbine, as there is always the risk of a loose nut/bolt/washer lurking inside the fuselage !

I'll keep an eye out for high EGT and it's good to know that the plane is not sensitive to CG, so I can move the turbine back a bit if I have to.

With a bit of luck I won't have to change anything. I'll do a test run next weekend. I get 2 days off for Easter holidays, yippee

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.