Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
 which would be a better first......... >

which would be a better first.........

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

which would be a better first.........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2007 | 01:01 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default which would be a better first.........

scale platform? F-16, F-15, or F-4. This will be my first scale jet. I flew airplanes for several years before switching to helicopters and now my airplane passion is pulling me back. Everything I've flown is scale so a trainer is out of the question. So the real question is: out of these 3 platforms, which one flies like a trainer so to speak? Thanks for the help in advance.
Old 11-24-2007 | 01:09 PM
  #2  
rcjetmodels's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Miami, FL
Default RE: which would be a better first.........


ORIGINAL: ironhide

scale platform? F-16, F-15, or F-4. This will be my first scale jet. I flew airplanes for several years before switching to helicopters and now my airplane passion is pulling me back. Everything I've flown is scale so a trainer is out of the question. So the real question is: out of these 3 platforms, which one flies like a trainer so to speak? Thanks for the help in advance.
hi,

IMO the F15 is the most stable platform for your transiction to jets.

regards
Old 11-24-2007 | 01:12 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cardiff, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: which would be a better first.........

I'm with Wagner,
F15, easy to see, easy to fly & land.
Plenty of scale colour schemes and info available.
Regards,
John C

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Jh16398.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	42.7 KB
ID:	810656  
Old 11-24-2007 | 01:41 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default RE: which would be a better first.........

i figured the F 15 would be the most stable. A few years ago when I thought I was ready for jets there was only a few manufacturers of the F 15. Now there is a plethora of jet manufacturers that offer this jet. I'd like to go ARF but would consider building it.
Old 11-24-2007 | 01:55 PM
  #5  
CARS II's Avatar
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,658
Received 137 Likes on 120 Posts
From: Sacramento CA
Default RE: which would be a better first.........

If you like to go ARF to get up in the air fast then, consider the TamJets F-16, it looks good, better yet it builds fast and simple and the flying caracteristics of it are excellente, this is one little jet that doesn't like to stall .
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Hf98764.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	105.7 KB
ID:	810730   Click image for larger version

Name:	Kf12438.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	101.6 KB
ID:	810731   Click image for larger version

Name:	Hm24835.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	112.6 KB
ID:	810732  
Old 11-24-2007 | 02:02 PM
  #6  
My Feedback: (49)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
From: Plymouth, MI
Default RE: which would be a better first.........

Yup, the F-15 is the best most stable flier. The F-16 (not a BVM) is also pretty good. Definitely stay away from a F-4 for a first jet.

Joe
Old 11-24-2007 | 04:57 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default RE: which would be a better first.........

how bout ground handling on the f-16 compared to the f-15? i like the f-16 better than the f-15, but the f-16 looks squirly on the ground.
Old 11-24-2007 | 05:05 PM
  #8  
CARS II's Avatar
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,658
Received 137 Likes on 120 Posts
From: Sacramento CA
Default RE: which would be a better first.........

Not a thing, I see no problems at all on the ground handling on the F-16, I should know I have a Kangaroo, if you can control a Roo on the TO. run anything after that if a pice of cake.
Old 11-24-2007 | 09:48 PM
  #9  
Wayne22's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,394
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Strathcona county, AB, CANADA
Default RE: which would be a better first.........

For the F-16, if you take the time to align the wheels, it will track straight as an arrow ...... you just can't make any suddent turns at any kind of speed I have dual rates on my nosewheel steering..super high for close in manoevering, and really, really low, for take offs and landings. However.....

Even though I have a 16, I'd vote for the F-15...more wing area, bigger, easier to see
Old 11-24-2007 | 10:11 PM
  #10  
erbroens's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,292
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
From: Curitiba, Parana, BRAZIL
Default RE: which would be a better first.........

I agree with the opinions posted here... the F-15 and the F-16 are good choices, however the F-15 has a aditional advantage of not needing wheel doors to look decent, unlike the F-16. They are not very complicated to build and maintain, but they are extra work and a source of potential problems that the F-15 doesn´t needs.

The F-16 tracks well too on the take off run, even in a moderate crosswind... just don´t slam the rudder too hard at it, and you will have no issues.

IMO you can´t go wrong with both.. and perhaps you can try a F-4 as a fourth jet.
Old 11-24-2007 | 11:13 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default RE: which would be a better first.........

looks like i'm going with the 15. let's see, which one should i.............
thanks all.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.