YA A-4 questions
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (24)
About to finish an OLD A-4 by Yellow. OS 91, Dynamax and scale wing, though it's not going to be "scale". This will be a sport flyer, hopefully.
I have two sets of directions, one set from a newer (not mine) model.
Do I have to reinforce the wing/fuselage joint with additional fiberglass tape? The old directions show it, the newer version does not. I've epoxied them on with West Systems and milled glass filler following the newer directions so far.
Secondly, the old directions show a cheater hole in the intake plenum, drawing air from the nose gear retract area. From my calculations, this appears necessary-the intakes are about 1.75" radius (1/2 circle), making a combined area of about 10 square inches; well rounded, smooth lips (reminds me of a girl I once knew...). Is the cheat inlet needed? The ducting is not "full-flow".
How is this beast to take off and fly? There really doesn't look like much wing area there.
Thanks in advance-I've learned a TON through this forum and appreciate any advice.
I have two sets of directions, one set from a newer (not mine) model.
Do I have to reinforce the wing/fuselage joint with additional fiberglass tape? The old directions show it, the newer version does not. I've epoxied them on with West Systems and milled glass filler following the newer directions so far.
Secondly, the old directions show a cheater hole in the intake plenum, drawing air from the nose gear retract area. From my calculations, this appears necessary-the intakes are about 1.75" radius (1/2 circle), making a combined area of about 10 square inches; well rounded, smooth lips (reminds me of a girl I once knew...). Is the cheat inlet needed? The ducting is not "full-flow".
How is this beast to take off and fly? There really doesn't look like much wing area there.
Thanks in advance-I've learned a TON through this forum and appreciate any advice.
#4

My Feedback: (28)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Heath,
TX
The plane is much more maneuverable and can reach a much higher speed.
The flying qualities don't seem to be comprimised with the smaller wing.
I have had 5 of these back in the mid 90's all but 1 had the scale wing. The one with the sport wing was a slug.
The flying qualities don't seem to be comprimised with the smaller wing.
I have had 5 of these back in the mid 90's all but 1 had the scale wing. The one with the sport wing was a slug.
#8

My Feedback: (28)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Heath,
TX
Im not sure how they tell you to do it now, but I cut a hole on the bottom of the air intake which allowed more air in through the front wheel well.
I remember the F16 defiantly needed a cheater, it wouldnt take off without it, those were 2 small cut outs just above the outer air intake.
I remember the F16 defiantly needed a cheater, it wouldnt take off without it, those were 2 small cut outs just above the outer air intake.



