Community
Search
Notices
RC Pattern Flying Discuss all topics pertaining to RC Pattern Flying in this forum.

Question About Pattern Airfolis

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2003 | 03:06 PM
  #1  
Boss248's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: River City, TX
Default Question About Pattern Airfolis

I was interested about the most common airfoil that is used in pattern these days...the airfoil seems to be thin with a fairly sharp leading edge and not very thick at the highest point.
Old 12-20-2003 | 01:09 PM
  #2  
JWN's Avatar
JWN
Community Moderators
My Feedback: (42)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,897
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Georgetown, TX
Default RE: Question About Pattern Airfolis

And your question would be?????

John
Old 12-20-2003 | 02:05 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: USA
Default RE: Question About Pattern Airfolis

Probably an NACA 0010 . A ten percent symmetrical. Could even be a bit less, but I would doubt it.
Old 12-20-2003 | 08:22 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Monson, MA
Default Pattern Airfoils 101

Hey Boss,...

Your question put me on the hunt for an article I remember reading a while back. It took me these past two days to tear my office apart before I finally found the article, ha!!

Rick Allison wrote an article in the April '94 issue of Model Builder magazine entitled !QUOT!Pattern Airfoils 101!QUOT!. In this article he had a comparative illustration of typical pattern airfoils for the day. He compared the Summit III, Jekyll, Conquest, and Cursor/Boxer airfoils. While the Summit, Conquest, and Cursor/Boxer were 13% thick, the Jekyll was 14% thick. The high point was the most furthest back on the Cursor/Boxer at 40%. Conquest high point was at 33%, Jekyll was 32% and Summit III was at 26%.

At the end of the article Mr. Allison stated that the particular airfoil that has worked best for him was a NACA Series 6 derivative with a wing root thickness of 13% and tip thickness of 9-10 percent, with the high point as far back as 40%. With the high point this far back it will give a relatively sharp leading edge radius allowing for clean and predictable "breaks" for stalls in snapping and spinning maneuvers.

Hope that answers some questions. If you are looking for plots of specific airfoils let me know I might be able to provide either an AutoCAD .dwg file or airfoil coordinates.

Sincerely,
Steve T.
Monson, Massachusetts
Old 12-20-2003 | 08:33 PM
  #5  
Boss248's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: River City, TX
Default RE: Pattern Airfoils 101

Steve..That does answer my question very well...thanks!!
Old 12-20-2003 | 10:10 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Land O Lakes, FL
Default RE: Pattern Airfoils 101

So Eppler 169 (14%) and 168 (12%) with the thickest portion of the air foil at 26.5% and a rounder tip would have a gentler stall...correct?

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.