CPLR - Oxalys NEW!!!!
#1
Thread Starter

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sheffield, UNITED KINGDOM
Hi
Anybody got any more info on CPLR's new F3A plane the Oxalys? Its available on ZN Line's site but no pictures as yet!
See here!
[link=http://www.znline.com/produits.php?langue=english&cle_menus=1023180495&c le_data=1080681950]Oxalys[/link]
Mach1GB
Anybody got any more info on CPLR's new F3A plane the Oxalys? Its available on ZN Line's site but no pictures as yet!
See here!
[link=http://www.znline.com/produits.php?langue=english&cle_menus=1023180495&c le_data=1080681950]Oxalys[/link]
Mach1GB
#4
The proof was in the eating it seems, Chip's bipe weighed 5 kgs to cope with wind, and I've heard the others struggled in the strong winds on the final day of the WC last year. double wing drag is a bonus coming down but not flying straight! Flier/builder team Onda and Naruke had the right idea, bring a monplane backup model (he flew it in the finals) and they had the smallest/thinnest wings of all on their Bipe. Probably why CPLR never brought his suxess along to the WC.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Wollongong, AL, AUSTRALIA
What happened to his Suxess biplane?
Not good enough?
Suxass then?
Not good enough?
Suxass then?

I bet you've been looking for a reason to use that one for a long time.
Matt
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Singapore, SINGAPORE
ORIGINAL: flywilly
Let me get this straight:
CPLR didn't have any success with his Suxess because it suxass in the wind...
Hey Jon - how's your Skystar flying - is the Webra behaving better!!
Let me get this straight:
CPLR didn't have any success with his Suxess because it suxass in the wind...

Hey Jon - how's your Skystar flying - is the Webra behaving better!!
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Perhaps the facts would help on the subject of the Suxess.
A couple of words is all it takes. Non-linear coupling. While the airplane flew brilliantly in most regimes, the F programs, with their high knife-edged performance requirements brought out the disadvantages of this fact of biplanes. Coupling on biplanes is much less linear with rudder and throttle position than on monoplanes. The idea of F3A design is to reduce pilot workload as much as possible to allow for concentration on things like geometry. Non-linear coupling creates difficulties that a pilot does not need when the object is to win. The monoplane, easier to tune, easier to fly, is simply the bigger stick at that level. His new design should present a very big stick for any competitor and is reported as being more than remarkable in the wind and turbulance resistance.
Regards,Mark
A couple of words is all it takes. Non-linear coupling. While the airplane flew brilliantly in most regimes, the F programs, with their high knife-edged performance requirements brought out the disadvantages of this fact of biplanes. Coupling on biplanes is much less linear with rudder and throttle position than on monoplanes. The idea of F3A design is to reduce pilot workload as much as possible to allow for concentration on things like geometry. Non-linear coupling creates difficulties that a pilot does not need when the object is to win. The monoplane, easier to tune, easier to fly, is simply the bigger stick at that level. His new design should present a very big stick for any competitor and is reported as being more than remarkable in the wind and turbulance resistance.
Regards,Mark
#16

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Czech Republic,
Hi guys,
I found few pictures of OXALYS fuselage here:
http://www.galileo-aeroworks.com/gal...ays/oxlays.htm
Enjoy it.
Alea Zapletal
I found few pictures of OXALYS fuselage here:
http://www.galileo-aeroworks.com/gal...ays/oxlays.htm
Enjoy it.
Alea Zapletal
#17

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: London, UNITED KINGDOM
that looks sleek, along the lines of his last two designs. It would be interesting to see that and a synergy side by side, to compare the differences.
James
James
#23
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Additional Oxalys info.
The fuse in the photo shows only one version, the one piece wing. This airplane will be available in a plug-in wing version also. Same airplane, two configurations. This is slated to be standard for all future designs that begin life with a one piece wing.
Robert,
Good news and bad news. The good news is that the Edge 540 is still in the works. The CAD is still being finished up and hopefully it will be tested later in the summer. Yes, this has to one of the longest concept-to-flight projects in modeling history, but the finished airplane should be magnificent. JP and I took ahold of the naked wing and gave it a twist test. VERY VERY strong. Stuctural integrity is incredible. This one is going to be within the 5kilo limit and very conducive to accepting aggresive 3D abuse from moderately skilled mortals such as myself. Oh, the bad news. Perhaps next year before a kit is produced.
Regards,
Mark
The fuse in the photo shows only one version, the one piece wing. This airplane will be available in a plug-in wing version also. Same airplane, two configurations. This is slated to be standard for all future designs that begin life with a one piece wing.
Robert,
Good news and bad news. The good news is that the Edge 540 is still in the works. The CAD is still being finished up and hopefully it will be tested later in the summer. Yes, this has to one of the longest concept-to-flight projects in modeling history, but the finished airplane should be magnificent. JP and I took ahold of the naked wing and gave it a twist test. VERY VERY strong. Stuctural integrity is incredible. This one is going to be within the 5kilo limit and very conducive to accepting aggresive 3D abuse from moderately skilled mortals such as myself. Oh, the bad news. Perhaps next year before a kit is produced.
Regards,
Mark
#24

My Feedback: (92)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rosamond, CA
Mark,
A couple of questions about the Oxalys. What accomodations are being made for electric? Will it still have the full length belly pan? And can you get it without the clear canopy? IOW, will the plug in wing version have a canopy hatch similar to a Partner?
I also noticed that the belly pan on the fuse in the pics seemed to end at the TE of the wing. Is this correct? If so it would seem to make it harder to put in a long pipe.
Thanks!
A couple of questions about the Oxalys. What accomodations are being made for electric? Will it still have the full length belly pan? And can you get it without the clear canopy? IOW, will the plug in wing version have a canopy hatch similar to a Partner?
I also noticed that the belly pan on the fuse in the pics seemed to end at the TE of the wing. Is this correct? If so it would seem to make it harder to put in a long pipe.
Thanks!



