Community
Search
Notices
RC Pattern Flying Discuss all topics pertaining to RC Pattern Flying in this forum.

Venus 40 Powerplant

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2007 | 02:29 PM
  #1  
rainedave's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Default Venus 40 Powerplant

Hi all. I am shopping for an engine for a Venus 40.

First, I have ruled out the YS-63s because of the price. I know this is probably the most popular engine, but I'm not considering it.

Having said that, which remaining engines provide adequate power without adding too much extra weight?

I'm thinking about a .70 4-stroke, or maybe an AX .46 (which my LHS sells for $95).

Is there a big enough advantage with the .70 to justify the cost and extra weight (about a 5oz increase over the .46)?

What about the AX .55? It's around 3.5ozs less than a .70 4-stroke, but a little heavier than the AX .46.

I assume a .52 4-stroke won't cut it, correct?

Thanks,
David
Old 10-22-2007 | 03:48 PM
  #2  
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Ocala, FL
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant

the ax 46 will fly it just great had gms 47 in mine and it was a rocket
Old 10-22-2007 | 07:06 PM
  #3  
rainedave's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant

Thanks, jetmech43. The .46 is the best buy, anyway.
Old 10-22-2007 | 07:14 PM
  #4  
My Feedback: (77)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: lakeodessa, MI
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant

i allso built one with an gms 47 , an for 69.00 from tower there hard to beat i thought it was an perfect match , and will balane with no added weight
Old 10-22-2007 | 07:27 PM
  #5  
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Ocala, FL
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant

the gms had alot of power, but couldnt get consistent runs out of it
Old 10-22-2007 | 08:21 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lehi, UT
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant

I have also found the gms to be a little troublesome, but if you work with them enough they do run. I would go with the OS 55AX, it has to be the coolest engine out with a 40 sized frame. Now they should make planes a touch bigger to match, say a 58-59" wingspan Venus .
Old 10-22-2007 | 08:31 PM
  #7  
rainedave's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant

Thanks, everyone. Since I can get the AX .46 for $95 at my LHS I will go with that.

Yes, I wish there was a Venus half-way between the two they offer. I have seven .61's and I'd love to use one in a "modern" pattern plane. One is going in a BPA-type UFO and the other in an SPA Super Sicroly II (Prettner design), but it would be nice to have a 60"-62" Venus or equivalent.

David
Old 10-22-2007 | 08:48 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant

I went a little silly and shoehorned a 61sf in the nose.

She fairly honks uphill
Old 10-22-2007 | 09:13 PM
  #9  
rainedave's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant

I'm sure it does! I worry about the structural integrity of these Asian arfs. I would definitely go in and reinforce the firewall and a few other areas if using an over-sized engine like that. There's a big difference between 5 1/2lbs of thrust and 8 1/2lbs of thrust on a plane that was engineered for .46's.

David
Old 10-22-2007 | 11:03 PM
  #10  
MTK
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Whippany, NJ
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant


ORIGINAL: rainedave

Thanks, everyone. Since I can get the AX .46 for $95 at my LHS I will go with that.

Yes, I wish there was a Venus half-way between the two they offer. I have seven .61's and I'd love to use one in a "modern" pattern plane. One is going in a BPA-type UFO and the other in an SPA Super Sicroly II (Prettner design), but it would be nice to have a 60"-62" Venus or equivalent.

David
Dave,

If you have some inclination to scratch build, why not make the venus into a 60 size? It is quite simple to do even with no plans. Make sketches of what the existing 40 size is and enlarge about 20%

MattK
Old 10-22-2007 | 11:52 PM
  #11  
rainedave's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant

Matt, I've actually though about that. It would be very easy to do by just taking measurements and drafting it in CAD. I think I'll do it.

I wonder what the differences are between the Venus and Venus II. Something tells be it's not just a straight scaling up.

Thanks,
David
Old 10-23-2007 | 12:14 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lehi, UT
Default RE: Venus 40 Powerplant

I've been eyeing this model:

http://www.giantscaleplanes.com/Lark-70.htm

It says 40 sized but the specs looks like they would fit a lightweight 60 sized engine, or maybe the 55AX would be perfect.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.