View Poll Results: A poll
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll
What Engine would you use?
#3
The reliabilty of the OS is undeniable but the YS , once set up correctly, is also fairly bulletproof and has gobs of power with a little less weight. I am not a YS guy as I have run the big OS 2 strokes the past 4 years in my larger planes. The one YS engine I have LOVED has been the 63 I have in my Oxalys50. Sweet combo!!!!!
#4
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
I got the OS. It is strong, reliable and it has more power that it seems, I truly believe it is a lot more than a two.stroke 45.
But its HEAVY. You will probably have to move everything way back to get the proper CG. It is no longer in production, and the replacements are lot more expensive (56a = $299; 81a = $340).
So, I vote for the YS. It is lighter, cheaper and has more power.
Regards,
But its HEAVY. You will probably have to move everything way back to get the proper CG. It is no longer in production, and the replacements are lot more expensive (56a = $299; 81a = $340).
So, I vote for the YS. It is lighter, cheaper and has more power.
Regards,
#5
YS is best of these engines for aerobatics and 3D because of its highpressurised and regulated fuelsystem that allows you to locate fueltank near CG, no trim change during flight!
And YS has such throttle response those others cannot compete with
And YS has such throttle response those others cannot compete with
#6
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Caledonia,
MI
The YS looks like it is the most popular engine in this selection and it was the engine I was interested in before the thread started.
But now it is becoming clear that it is the lightest most powerful engine for the money.
Thanks,
Flyer 202
But now it is becoming clear that it is the lightest most powerful engine for the money.
Thanks,
Flyer 202
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (40)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Merrimack,
NH
Saito and OS are great sport engines. I own them, fly them with pleasure. The YS are competition engines, do everything the sport engines do, but with better power/weight. If you are thinking of getting into competition aerobatics, you really should check out the YS line.
#9
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: IRYMPLE, AUSTRALIA
I run an OS 160 2stroke in a 2x2 patternship no problems; VERY reliable but also HEAVY. I DO run my tank on the C of G - no problems.
#10

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS
I flew the Tracer with a Saito-72, and think it is the perfect engine for this plane. If you want a bit more power, go for the Saito-82! But IMHO, you don't need it for this plane.
Just make sure you have friends around who know how to adjust a YS if you get one. I have seem some very frustrated people looking at YS engines while I was flying my lines....!
Just make sure you have friends around who know how to adjust a YS if you get one. I have seem some very frustrated people looking at YS engines while I was flying my lines....!
#11

My Feedback: (10)
ORIGINAL: Flyer 202
I would like to find out which engine is more popular for a Great Planes Tracer.
Thanks, Flyer 202
I would like to find out which engine is more popular for a Great Planes Tracer.
Thanks, Flyer 202
#13

My Feedback: (1)
I'm with jeffk464. If you're not completely set on a 4-stroke then the AX .55 is a great choice. I have one in my Venus 40 and it is a great match (5lbs., 8.5ozs. less fuel). You can buy some nice servos or lots of fuel with the money saved. I'm running mine on Powermaster 5% and it runs great. So, you won't be needing to spend all that money on high nitro YS fuel. I mounted mine at about 10 o'clock to avoid dealing with inverted issues (which I seem to always have). It's not as streamlined, but it's simple to fuel, start and adjust.
David
David












