Community
Search
Notices
RC Pattern Flying Discuss all topics pertaining to RC Pattern Flying in this forum.
View Poll Results: A poll
O.S. FS-70 II Surpass
5.63%
Saito 72 AAC
8.45%
YS 63-S
85.92%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

What Engine would you use?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2008 | 05:12 PM
  #1  
Flyer 202's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Caledonia, MI
Default What Engine would you use?

I would like to find out which engine is more popular for a Great Planes Tracer.

Thanks, Flyer 202
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ki20246.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	6.9 KB
ID:	982250   Click image for larger version

Name:	Pk29530.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	9.6 KB
ID:	982251   Click image for larger version

Name:	Hm24837.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	12.2 KB
ID:	982252  
Old 07-02-2008 | 03:31 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: IRYMPLE, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

I would go with the reliability of O.S...................[8D]
Old 07-02-2008 | 11:03 AM
  #3  
My Feedback: (28)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
From: Spring, TX
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

The reliabilty of the OS is undeniable but the YS , once set up correctly, is also fairly bulletproof and has gobs of power with a little less weight. I am not a YS guy as I have run the big OS 2 strokes the past 4 years in my larger planes. The one YS engine I have LOVED has been the 63 I have in my Oxalys50. Sweet combo!!!!!
Old 07-02-2008 | 12:30 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

I got the OS. It is strong, reliable and it has more power that it seems, I truly believe it is a lot more than a two.stroke 45.
But its HEAVY. You will probably have to move everything way back to get the proper CG. It is no longer in production, and the replacements are lot more expensive (56a = $299; 81a = $340).
So, I vote for the YS. It is lighter, cheaper and has more power.
Regards,
Old 07-02-2008 | 04:33 PM
  #5  
Timbba's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Raahe, FINLAND
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

YS is best of these engines for aerobatics and 3D because of its highpressurised and regulated fuelsystem that allows you to locate fueltank near CG, no trim change during flight!
And YS has such throttle response those others cannot compete with
Old 07-02-2008 | 05:00 PM
  #6  
Flyer 202's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Caledonia, MI
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

The YS looks like it is the most popular engine in this selection and it was the engine I was interested in before the thread started.
But now it is becoming clear that it is the lightest most powerful engine for the money.
Thanks,
Flyer 202
Old 07-03-2008 | 12:40 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Manassas, VA
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

I had tracers with the Saito 72 and a 46 two stoke. Both had plenty of power. I find the Saito a lot easier to run and adjust than the YS.
Old 07-03-2008 | 11:28 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (40)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Merrimack, NH
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

Saito and OS are great sport engines. I own them, fly them with pleasure. The YS are competition engines, do everything the sport engines do, but with better power/weight. If you are thinking of getting into competition aerobatics, you really should check out the YS line.
Old 07-04-2008 | 03:42 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: IRYMPLE, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

I run an OS 160 2stroke in a 2x2 patternship no problems; VERY reliable but also HEAVY. I DO run my tank on the C of G - no problems.
Old 07-04-2008 | 03:16 PM
  #10  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

I flew the Tracer with a Saito-72, and think it is the perfect engine for this plane. If you want a bit more power, go for the Saito-82! But IMHO, you don't need it for this plane.

Just make sure you have friends around who know how to adjust a YS if you get one. I have seem some very frustrated people looking at YS engines while I was flying my lines....!
Old 07-04-2008 | 06:30 PM
  #11  
Zippi's Avatar
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,977
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Evansville, IN
Default RE: What Engine would you use?


ORIGINAL: Flyer 202

I would like to find out which engine is more popular for a Great Planes Tracer.

Thanks, Flyer 202
I don't know about the Tracer but if I was going to pick one it would be one you didn't mention. I'd get the Saito .82. The YS is a good engine but to get all the power you need to run some high nitro fuel and the Saito .82 will give you what you want on 10% fuel.
Old 07-05-2008 | 11:58 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lehi, UT
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

I would strongly advise you use the 55AX, its absolutely reliable and a real torquer.
Old 07-05-2008 | 12:32 PM
  #13  
rainedave's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Default RE: What Engine would you use?

I'm with jeffk464. If you're not completely set on a 4-stroke then the AX .55 is a great choice. I have one in my Venus 40 and it is a great match (5lbs., 8.5ozs. less fuel). You can buy some nice servos or lots of fuel with the money saved. I'm running mine on Powermaster 5% and it runs great. So, you won't be needing to spend all that money on high nitro YS fuel. I mounted mine at about 10 o'clock to avoid dealing with inverted issues (which I seem to always have). It's not as streamlined, but it's simple to fuel, start and adjust.

David
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Fd93369.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	83.9 KB
ID:	984424  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.