New Axiome 110 GP - three improvement
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Shanghai, CHINA
New Axiome 110 GP
There are three improvement:
1. Engine mont - 7 degrees tilt. The pipe will never touch the belly pan. You don't need cut belly pan, when you assemble your Axiome 110 GP




2. Stabilizer - Elevator Servo. Easy to clean your plane, when you finish flying.




3. Landing Gear - Carbon Fiber. Lighter & Stronger



There are three improvement:
1. Engine mont - 7 degrees tilt. The pipe will never touch the belly pan. You don't need cut belly pan, when you assemble your Axiome 110 GP




2. Stabilizer - Elevator Servo. Easy to clean your plane, when you finish flying.




3. Landing Gear - Carbon Fiber. Lighter & Stronger



#2
What you guys need to do is make some planes that are in between the small .91 and the full sized 1.70s.
The .90s are just a little too small, the 1.70's just a bit to big, exspensive and techically demanding with regards to engine etc for the hobby F3A'er.
YS have for years, had the wonderful 1.40FZ, now called 1.40 sports. It's a GREAT engine, super easy, demands nothing and just works!
Unfortunately, it's just to small for todays full sized F3A machines... yet to big for the smaller .90 hobby versions.
And this is a missed opportunity as it's still their best, alround simple no problem engine!
What quality/competitive planes do we put it in?
I look forward to you're company solving the problem.
The .90s are just a little too small, the 1.70's just a bit to big, exspensive and techically demanding with regards to engine etc for the hobby F3A'er.
YS have for years, had the wonderful 1.40FZ, now called 1.40 sports. It's a GREAT engine, super easy, demands nothing and just works!
Unfortunately, it's just to small for todays full sized F3A machines... yet to big for the smaller .90 hobby versions.
And this is a missed opportunity as it's still their best, alround simple no problem engine!
What quality/competitive planes do we put it in?
I look forward to you're company solving the problem.
#3
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Shanghai, CHINA
ORIGINAL: David Bathe
What you guys need to do is make some planes that are in between the small .91 and the full sized 1.70s.
The .90s are just a little too small, the 1.70's just a bit to big, exspensive and techically demanding with regards to engine etc for the hobby F3A'er.
YS have for years, had the wonderful 1.40FZ, now called 1.40 sports. It's a GREAT engine, super easy, demands nothing and just works!
Unfortunately, it's just to small for todays full sized F3A machines... yet to big for the smaller .90 hobby versions.
And this is a missed opportunity as it's still their best, alround simple no problem engine!
What quality/competitive planes do we put it in?
I look forward to you're company solving the problem.
What you guys need to do is make some planes that are in between the small .91 and the full sized 1.70s.
The .90s are just a little too small, the 1.70's just a bit to big, exspensive and techically demanding with regards to engine etc for the hobby F3A'er.
YS have for years, had the wonderful 1.40FZ, now called 1.40 sports. It's a GREAT engine, super easy, demands nothing and just works!
Unfortunately, it's just to small for todays full sized F3A machines... yet to big for the smaller .90 hobby versions.
And this is a missed opportunity as it's still their best, alround simple no problem engine!
What quality/competitive planes do we put it in?
I look forward to you're company solving the problem.
Good question.
We try to build a step for pattern player from 50 to 170. We think the cost of 50-70 are almost same, but the planes are too small. 140-170 planes are big but the cost of 140-170 are almost same.
That's why we make Axiome 110. 110 engines are much cheaper than 140-170, the planes is much bigger than 50-70.




