Is a biplane best fit for P-11?
#26
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Shenzhen, CHINA
ORIGINAL: DaveL322
The 1/4 loop entry, 1/2 loop in the middle (with the integrated 1/2 roll), and the 1/4 loop exit should all have the same radii. Not easy.
The 1/4 loop entry, 1/2 loop in the middle (with the integrated 1/2 roll), and the 1/4 loop exit should all have the same radii. Not easy.
Is a biplane performing tight KE loop better?
And of course there should be a defined straight line after the M before the 1/2 Rev Cuban turnaround. Very difficult to fly this maneuver at <175 meters geometrically correct AND have it look smooth.
Eric
#27
ORIGINAL: ericng
Is a biplane performing tight KE loop better?
Is a biplane performing tight KE loop better?
ORIGINAL: ericng
Attention must be paid for this maneuver since exceeding 175 meters would be downgraded.
Attention must be paid for this maneuver since exceeding 175 meters would be downgraded.
Regards,
Dave
#28

A Biplanes rudder authority comes from more than just side area. The arrangement of the wings funnels air or does some other voodoo magic to increase rudder authority. I personally have not flown the sequence yet because of school getting in the way, but I'm curious/excited to get started on it and see where the biplane comes in handy.
#29
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Shenzhen, CHINA
Also, relatively less wing span and with the flat interplane struts provide more rudder authority to yaw the fuselage during KE loop from downward to upward.
Eric
Eric




