Engine choice ..... again!!
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: rugby, UNITED KINGDOM
I have seen many people flying with YS140's and quite a few others on a variety of 2 strokes. Having has a YS120ac for a short while (Why o why did I ever sell it??? DOH!!! Oh I remember I didn't have shares in Coolpower!!)) I can realise that it costs around £4 to £5 per flight in fuel alone. For the new pilot wanting the right tool for the job this seems a bit excessive...hence looking at a larger two stroke like the Moki 135 running on straight....imediately cutting the cost of fuel in half and gaining reliability as the YS's that I have seen require regular yearly maintenance where as a two stroke can be rebuilt by a mere mortal like myself! I can realy appreciate that a 4 stroke is better for slowing the plane on down lines but have just recently discovered if you use a big wide blade prop this slows the two stroke down nearly as well.
So my logic is telling me a modern shape pattern plane i.e. draggy and slow with a big 2 stroke and a wide blade prop should come very close indeed????
What do you guys think??
So my logic is telling me a modern shape pattern plane i.e. draggy and slow with a big 2 stroke and a wide blade prop should come very close indeed????
What do you guys think??
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (20)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Franklin,
TN
There is a thread on this site about the Moki 1.35 used in a pattern ship. I think they said a 16 X 10 or maybe 16 x 11 worked great on 5% nitro. They ended the thread saying "why spend $600 on an engine?"
I have a Moki 1.35 on a 1/4 Edge that cranks an 18 x 8 prop on 5%. I had to go to 18 X 8 to keep it from whining like a 40 sized motor at high rpm. The engine is ultra reliable and so powerful that I probably only use 8 oz of fuel a flight (running at partial throttle). With the 18 x 8, the plane slows down so much that I now land with a little power.
I have a Moki 1.35 on a 1/4 Edge that cranks an 18 x 8 prop on 5%. I had to go to 18 X 8 to keep it from whining like a 40 sized motor at high rpm. The engine is ultra reliable and so powerful that I probably only use 8 oz of fuel a flight (running at partial throttle). With the 18 x 8, the plane slows down so much that I now land with a little power.
#3
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lethbridge,
AB, CANADA
Sounds ok, but why not go with the OS 160? Don't know the price of the 135, but from what I have seen of their other engines, seemed a bit expensy. 160 definitely will pull ur plane around, with lots to spare.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Try Singahobby, the OS 160 translates to a cheaper price than the Moki, atleast here anyway.
OS 160 on a Cline fuel regulator should fit the bill nicely
Try a search for old threads on the 160 with a Cline , there have been quite a few.
OS 160 on a Cline fuel regulator should fit the bill nicely
Try a search for old threads on the 160 with a Cline , there have been quite a few.



