Community
Search
Notices
RC Pattern Flying Discuss all topics pertaining to RC Pattern Flying in this forum.

Engine choice ..... again!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2003 | 11:02 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: rugby, UNITED KINGDOM
Default Engine choice ..... again!!

I have seen many people flying with YS140's and quite a few others on a variety of 2 strokes. Having has a YS120ac for a short while (Why o why did I ever sell it??? DOH!!! Oh I remember I didn't have shares in Coolpower!!)) I can realise that it costs around £4 to £5 per flight in fuel alone. For the new pilot wanting the right tool for the job this seems a bit excessive...hence looking at a larger two stroke like the Moki 135 running on straight....imediately cutting the cost of fuel in half and gaining reliability as the YS's that I have seen require regular yearly maintenance where as a two stroke can be rebuilt by a mere mortal like myself! I can realy appreciate that a 4 stroke is better for slowing the plane on down lines but have just recently discovered if you use a big wide blade prop this slows the two stroke down nearly as well.

So my logic is telling me a modern shape pattern plane i.e. draggy and slow with a big 2 stroke and a wide blade prop should come very close indeed????

What do you guys think??
Old 07-18-2003 | 11:41 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (20)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Franklin, TN
Default Moki 1.35

There is a thread on this site about the Moki 1.35 used in a pattern ship. I think they said a 16 X 10 or maybe 16 x 11 worked great on 5% nitro. They ended the thread saying "why spend $600 on an engine?"

I have a Moki 1.35 on a 1/4 Edge that cranks an 18 x 8 prop on 5%. I had to go to 18 X 8 to keep it from whining like a 40 sized motor at high rpm. The engine is ultra reliable and so powerful that I probably only use 8 oz of fuel a flight (running at partial throttle). With the 18 x 8, the plane slows down so much that I now land with a little power.
Old 07-18-2003 | 06:24 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lethbridge, AB, CANADA
Default Engine choice ..... again!!


Sounds ok, but why not go with the OS 160? Don't know the price of the 135, but from what I have seen of their other engines, seemed a bit expensy. 160 definitely will pull ur plane around, with lots to spare.
Old 07-19-2003 | 08:24 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: rugby, UNITED KINGDOM
Default Engine choice ..... again!!

Lems

What was the thread can you remember?

Reason for Moki half the price of the OS!!!

Rich
Old 07-20-2003 | 11:20 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Default Engine choice ..... again!!

Try Singahobby, the OS 160 translates to a cheaper price than the Moki, atleast here anyway.

OS 160 on a Cline fuel regulator should fit the bill nicely
Try a search for old threads on the 160 with a Cline , there have been quite a few.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.