Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
#101
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
Hi
I am also thinking a lot of buying a 770 , as a replacement for my ASP 400 on my 2150mm vs fw 190. The ASP have given me too many deadsticks now ,and i cant use it.
All i have read so far regarding the 770 is positive , it runs without glow , which the ASP never did , even with glowpower it stopped in the air.
The only thing that keeps me from buying a UMS 770 is that i dont know if it will hold for years of flying? , the fact that it is made in India frightens me a little , will the metals and alloys stand the test of time and use...?
I am also thinking a lot of buying a 770 , as a replacement for my ASP 400 on my 2150mm vs fw 190. The ASP have given me too many deadsticks now ,and i cant use it.
All i have read so far regarding the 770 is positive , it runs without glow , which the ASP never did , even with glowpower it stopped in the air.
The only thing that keeps me from buying a UMS 770 is that i dont know if it will hold for years of flying? , the fact that it is made in India frightens me a little , will the metals and alloys stand the test of time and use...?
#104
Thread Starter
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
Oh, don't worry! Each day that passes I come up with more and more ways to rationalize the purchase. Here are a couple of today's:
1. Well, I'm not spending any money traveling back east for scale meets (e.g. Old Rhinebeck or HDP).
2. The yen is the strongest it's been in three years
No doubt there will be more!
1. Well, I'm not spending any money traveling back east for scale meets (e.g. Old Rhinebeck or HDP).
2. The yen is the strongest it's been in three years
No doubt there will be more!
#106
Thread Starter
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
Japanese are both tech crazy and German product crazy (maybe even if it's a made-in-India German product), so I'm pretty sure there are a few others around. But I think I can safely say I'll be the only person in Shikoku with one. As for bragging rights, I'll have to learn to brag in Japanese.
#108
Thread Starter
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
ORIGINAL: nilsreinert123
Yeah , guess i`ll have to wait some years and read the reports hehe
Yeah , guess i`ll have to wait some years and read the reports hehe
#109
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: RaesfeldNRW, GERMANY
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
Hi Abufletcher!
The Fokker EIII on page one was build and flown by my Dad. He owned a Proctor Nieuport 28 as well, that was flown with the first rotary engine build by Wolfgang Seidel, the ST540, a five cylinder with 40ccm. That was enough power for that little airplane and we were not sure about the big ST770 in the Fokker. Well, it does look much better than a too small engine, especially with that "open" Fokker cowling. In the end, it proved that the ST770 was just the right fit to the airframe. Sure it is overpowered, but not much. It swings a bigger/scaler prop and having some "spare-power" on finals is sometimes the live-insurance for a WWI aircraft.
The ST770 is definitely not in the G62 range of power. With those 7 cylinders and 14 valves, there is quite some energy waisted to turn the engine.
Go buy that engine, you gonna love it. And it makes a 1:4 Pup a one-of with it's great sound.
Best regards,
David
The Fokker EIII on page one was build and flown by my Dad. He owned a Proctor Nieuport 28 as well, that was flown with the first rotary engine build by Wolfgang Seidel, the ST540, a five cylinder with 40ccm. That was enough power for that little airplane and we were not sure about the big ST770 in the Fokker. Well, it does look much better than a too small engine, especially with that "open" Fokker cowling. In the end, it proved that the ST770 was just the right fit to the airframe. Sure it is overpowered, but not much. It swings a bigger/scaler prop and having some "spare-power" on finals is sometimes the live-insurance for a WWI aircraft.
The ST770 is definitely not in the G62 range of power. With those 7 cylinders and 14 valves, there is quite some energy waisted to turn the engine.
Go buy that engine, you gonna love it. And it makes a 1:4 Pup a one-of with it's great sound.
Best regards,
David
#110
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boise,
ID
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
Just wanted to stoke the fire a bit.....A friend was at a scale qualifier in Washington state. One of the participants flew a Corsair with the Seidel 770...my friend reports that the look was perfect and that it ran like a watch......
#113
Thread Starter
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
Just to update that I AM still planning to buy the 770 when I get back to Japan...and the Leica IS going to sell on eBay in a couple of days.
Some things you just have to do.
Some things you just have to do.
#116
Thread Starter
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
ORIGINAL: TFF
I applaud and boo you at the same time.
I applaud and boo you at the same time.
Just dont let it sit too long.
One thing though to remember with that big, scale prop: There's not much clearance to spare for sloppy landings!
PS. Today's dollar-to-yen exchange rate: 83 (as compared to 120 two years ago).
#118
Thread Starter
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
ORIGINAL: jtisch
''Endaka'' bit me in the butt from the time I went to Japan and the time I left. Glad to see it's working for you!
''Endaka'' bit me in the butt from the time I went to Japan and the time I left. Glad to see it's working for you!
That and cashing out of my Leica stuff.
#119
Thread Starter
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
But to put this sort of purchase in perspective. For anyone with any of the following, you needn't be envious:
1. Anyone with one the "standard" 3-cylinder radials from one of the "big" companies
2. Anyone with one of the multi-cylinder Laser engines
3. Anyone with a $1,000+ radio (or 2 $500 radios)
4. Anyone with a dedicated trailer for their RC models
5. Anyone with a JetSki
6. Anyone with a new car or truck
7. Anyone with a big screen TV
8. Etc.
1. Anyone with one the "standard" 3-cylinder radials from one of the "big" companies
2. Anyone with one of the multi-cylinder Laser engines
3. Anyone with a $1,000+ radio (or 2 $500 radios)
4. Anyone with a dedicated trailer for their RC models
5. Anyone with a JetSki
6. Anyone with a new car or truck
7. Anyone with a big screen TV
8. Etc.
#120
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
You need to come up with number 9; I am not looking too good on your list. Getting it in a plane will help you not worry about it being in a box. A Pup is the way to go.
#121
Thread Starter
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
ORIGINAL: TFF
You need to come up with number 9; I am not looking too good on your list.
You need to come up with number 9; I am not looking too good on your list.
You know, I really should get a Ph.D. in rationalization!
Getting it in a plane will help you not worry about it being in a box. A Pup is the way to go.
#123
Thread Starter
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
You think that's funny, wait until you see my Seidel on this:
http://www.amr-rc.com/index.php?path...id=6&langue=en
http://www.amr-rc.com/index.php?path...id=6&langue=en
#125
Thread Starter
RE: Seidel 7-70 radial: Help me decide!
BTW, I like the strategy used on the Proctor EIII (or at least one that I read about) where the engine is build into a removable tray along with tank and servos. The thing about an engine like the 770 is that it's not an engine you just put into one model forever.