RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   RC Scale Aircraft (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-scale-aircraft-169/)
-   -   Spitfire question (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-scale-aircraft-169/4154385-spitfire-question.html)

Triple-A 04-11-2006 09:18 PM

Spitfire question
 
I going to start working on a 1/5th spit. I'm going to do the clipped wing version and am wondering what to expect handling wise. Will losing that much wing area make a super HUGH differents? It's a Pica kit for what that's worth.
Bob

Jimmbbo 04-11-2006 11:06 PM

RE: Spitfire question
 
Would expect little difference... The wing loading will be marginally increased, as will the roll rate, but at model scale, power loading is soooo excessive that any adverse effects will be lost...

Cheers!

Jim

Ed 04-11-2006 11:10 PM

RE: Spitfire question
 
Why would anyone want to ruin that beautiful elliptical wing [:o] , but no, it shouldn't make too much difference.

> Jim [:o]

Idigbo 04-12-2006 02:55 AM

RE: Spitfire question
 
1 Attachment(s)
Completely agree with GeeBeeJim, I had a BT Mk14 with clipped wings, in Belgian colours, liked it on the ground, but once in the air, although it seemed to fly as well as the other full wing BT Spitfires I have had, it just didn't look right. After only a couple of weeks, I gave it tips, new ailerons and the other changes and turned it into this PR19. Back to looking good in the air too. I can confirm though, having flown the same model with and without tips, that there is not much difference, apart from the clipped version rolled quicker, or seemed to.

Ian.

rrudytoo 04-12-2006 08:12 AM

RE: Spitfire question
 
1 Attachment(s)
Idigbo hit it right on the head regarding his description of the flight characteristics of the two wing forms. Supermarine clipped the Spit's wing to enhance low altitude maneuverability and in this they succeeded admirably. But, I have to agree with both Idigbo and GeeBee Jim that the clipped wing is esthectically the lesser of the two shapes. But, hey, that's just me.

Al


Chad Veich 04-12-2006 08:31 AM

RE: Spitfire question
 
Hey Bob, I like the clipped wing Spit myself and I'm a bona-fide Spitfire fanatic! Or maybe I'm just wierd? Either way, you're not alone. I say go for it!

t_burley 04-12-2006 09:49 AM

RE: Spitfire question
 


ORIGINAL: Chad Veich

Hey Bob, I like the clipped wing Spit myself and I'm a bona-fide Spitfire fanatic! Or maybe I'm just wierd? Either way, you're not alone. I say go for it!
clipped spitty's, pink spitty's, blue spitty's, he like em different as well :D

Chad Veich 04-12-2006 02:43 PM

RE: Spitfire question
 


ORIGINAL: t_burley
clipped spitty's, pink spitty's, blue spitty's, he like em different as well :D
You got it Todd! One only has to look at my avatar to know I like them unique. Blue, clipped, and counter-rotaters too!

Ed 04-12-2006 06:17 PM

RE: Spitfire question
 
1 Attachment(s)
Even Red > ( As long as the wing stays elliptical [>:] [:'(] [:@] )


Meschmidt 04-12-2006 07:35 PM

RE: Spitfire question
 
Another point, Pica kits tend to be on the heavy side when built. You may need all the wing area you can get. A little swiss cheesing on the non-critical areas can remedy this if you think it is worth the trouble. Paul

Bish Wheeler 04-12-2006 09:00 PM

RE: Spitfire question
 
Be sure you "cant" the gear forward about and inch or plan on never flying off grass. The Pica will NOT taxi on grass with the gear in the scale location. It will be immediately on it's nose.

Bish

IFLYRC-RCU 04-23-2006 10:40 PM

RE: Spitfire question
 
and.. keep the tail light, light, light..

Had to add close to 5 lbs of nose wt in mine !!!

Yikes.

Second the gear foward comment.

Flew fine for 5 years or so.. then.. well, nuf said.

grin.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.