Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Scale Aircraft
 Spitfire question >

Spitfire question

Community
Search
Notices
RC Scale Aircraft Discuss rc scale aircraft here (for giant scale see category above)

Spitfire question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2006 | 09:18 PM
  #1  
Triple-A's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (93)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: palmdale, CA
Default Spitfire question

I going to start working on a 1/5th spit. I'm going to do the clipped wing version and am wondering what to expect handling wise. Will losing that much wing area make a super HUGH differents? It's a Pica kit for what that's worth.
Bob
Old 04-11-2006 | 11:06 PM
  #2  
Jimmbbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fresno, CA
Default RE: Spitfire question

Would expect little difference... The wing loading will be marginally increased, as will the roll rate, but at model scale, power loading is soooo excessive that any adverse effects will be lost...

Cheers!

Jim
Old 04-11-2006 | 11:10 PM
  #3  
Ed
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bemis, NM
Default RE: Spitfire question

Why would anyone want to ruin that beautiful elliptical wing [] , but no, it shouldn't make too much difference.

> Jim []
Old 04-12-2006 | 02:55 AM
  #4  
Idigbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Barrowhill, Staffordshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Spitfire question

Completely agree with GeeBeeJim, I had a BT Mk14 with clipped wings, in Belgian colours, liked it on the ground, but once in the air, although it seemed to fly as well as the other full wing BT Spitfires I have had, it just didn't look right. After only a couple of weeks, I gave it tips, new ailerons and the other changes and turned it into this PR19. Back to looking good in the air too. I can confirm though, having flown the same model with and without tips, that there is not much difference, apart from the clipped version rolled quicker, or seemed to.

Ian.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ax72991.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	40.5 KB
ID:	443856   Click image for larger version

Name:	Je99891.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	36.8 KB
ID:	443857  
Old 04-12-2006 | 08:12 AM
  #5  
rrudytoo's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Simpsonville, SC
Default RE: Spitfire question

Idigbo hit it right on the head regarding his description of the flight characteristics of the two wing forms. Supermarine clipped the Spit's wing to enhance low altitude maneuverability and in this they succeeded admirably. But, I have to agree with both Idigbo and GeeBee Jim that the clipped wing is esthectically the lesser of the two shapes. But, hey, that's just me.

Al

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Nk27942.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	39.2 KB
ID:	443940  
Old 04-12-2006 | 08:31 AM
  #6  
My Feedback: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,688
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 27 Posts
From: Litchfield Park, AZ
Default RE: Spitfire question

Hey Bob, I like the clipped wing Spit myself and I'm a bona-fide Spitfire fanatic! Or maybe I'm just wierd? Either way, you're not alone. I say go for it!
Old 04-12-2006 | 09:49 AM
  #7  
My Feedback: (59)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bakersfield, CA
Default RE: Spitfire question


ORIGINAL: Chad Veich

Hey Bob, I like the clipped wing Spit myself and I'm a bona-fide Spitfire fanatic! Or maybe I'm just wierd? Either way, you're not alone. I say go for it!
clipped spitty's, pink spitty's, blue spitty's, he like em different as well
Old 04-12-2006 | 02:43 PM
  #8  
My Feedback: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,688
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 27 Posts
From: Litchfield Park, AZ
Default RE: Spitfire question


ORIGINAL: t_burley
clipped spitty's, pink spitty's, blue spitty's, he like em different as well
You got it Todd! One only has to look at my avatar to know I like them unique. Blue, clipped, and counter-rotaters too!
Old 04-12-2006 | 06:17 PM
  #9  
Ed
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bemis, NM
Default RE: Spitfire question

Even Red > ( As long as the wing stays elliptical [>:] [:'(] [:@] )

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Bz77557.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	58.5 KB
ID:	444172  
Old 04-12-2006 | 07:35 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Default RE: Spitfire question

Another point, Pica kits tend to be on the heavy side when built. You may need all the wing area you can get. A little swiss cheesing on the non-critical areas can remedy this if you think it is worth the trouble. Paul
Old 04-12-2006 | 09:00 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Boise, ID
Default RE: Spitfire question

Be sure you "cant" the gear forward about and inch or plan on never flying off grass. The Pica will NOT taxi on grass with the gear in the scale location. It will be immediately on it's nose.

Bish
Old 04-23-2006 | 10:40 PM
  #12  
My Feedback: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Waterford, MI
Default RE: Spitfire question

and.. keep the tail light, light, light..

Had to add close to 5 lbs of nose wt in mine !!!

Yikes.

Second the gear foward comment.

Flew fine for 5 years or so.. then.. well, nuf said.

grin.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.