Community
Search
Notices
RC Tanks Discuss all aspects of rc tank building and driving here!

Mato Metal Sherman

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2014, 05:13 PM
  #26  
Tanque
 
Tanque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 2,894
Received 95 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YHR
Others are really stepping up their game though, and Tamiya is so quiet and slow to release stuff. The Hobby is certainly moving on without them.
I ask the question as rhetorical. Public or private? I suspect Tamiya is a publicly own shareholder company, perhaps it's private I don't know. I'd be curious to know if the Heng Longs, Mato, Wusan, Trumpeter, Imex are publicly owned or private. I suspect privately owned companies are able to move faster than a publicly owned shareholder company that has to explain profits/ losses to their shareholders. I may be way off
base but I believe the type of company has something to do with it. Even a private company has to turn a profit but has less people to explain to. All of the firms I mentioned may well be subsidiaries or affiliates
of larger parent companies.

Smaller one or two man firms can pretty much do what they want as long as they remain independent and have enough for R & D and food to live on...although perhaps not in that order

Update- I just read Tamiya is a privately held company. So much for that theory.

Jerry.

Last edited by Tanque; 09-24-2014 at 05:17 PM.
Old 09-24-2014, 05:32 PM
  #27  
FreakyDude
 
FreakyDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cambridge ON, CANADA
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All the Tank manufacturers or brands as far as I know are privately held.
Old 09-24-2014, 06:16 PM
  #28  
TheBennyB
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: West Grove, PA
Posts: 3,147
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by YHR
Others are really stepping up their game though, and Tamiya is so quiet and slow to release stuff. The Hobby is certainly moving on without them.
Not sure about that. The IS-2 release wasn't that long ago. Won't be long before we see a rehash of that as well I'm guessing. Tamiya still releases NEW models though not on a timely
manner we'd all love. I agree on supporting all makes and models and this sherman does look interesting, but I'm still a little hesitant on all that weight with the same tired gearboxes
for a heavy IR battle weekend.
Old 09-24-2014, 06:36 PM
  #29  
YHR
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
YHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, CANADA
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

IF this is aluminum cast then it might not be that heavy.
Old 09-24-2014, 07:16 PM
  #30  
Pah co chu puk
 
Pah co chu puk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ridgway, CO
Posts: 3,231
Received 143 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

I think the all metal one would make a nice collector piece. if it is aluminum, then it will last for many years.
Old 09-24-2014, 07:18 PM
  #31  
FreakyDude
 
FreakyDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cambridge ON, CANADA
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cast aluminum will be heavy enough, No doubt they will melt scrap aluminum down to save material costs. I can't see them using aluminum given the shortages for the material right now.
But then again its china, I have seen metal automotive parts come from there that are ridiculous low priced. Its almost like the government is paying the companies to make the parts.
Anyway I am going to give a few of these tanks a go and see how they fare
Old 09-24-2014, 09:04 PM
  #32  
Tanque
 
Tanque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 2,894
Received 95 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FreakyDude
Cast aluminum will be heavy enough, No doubt they will melt scrap aluminum down to save material costs. I can't see them using aluminum given the shortages for the material right now.
But then again its china, I have seen metal automotive parts come from there that are ridiculous low priced. Its almost like the government is paying the companies to make the parts.
Anyway I am going to give a few of these tanks a go and see how they fare
Die cast aluminum could be wafer thin; remember it's done under pressure. My type of aluminum casting, sand casting produces heavy castings as it relies on gravity and the fluidity
of the molten metal to flow into the mold cavity and thin parts aren't typically produced that way.

Jerry
Old 09-25-2014, 12:24 AM
  #33  
tomhugill
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 2,384
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I've seen 8kg quoted as the all in weight.
Old 09-25-2014, 12:47 AM
  #34  
Strato50
 
Strato50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON, CANADA
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tomhugill
I've seen 8kg quoted as the all in weight.
Yikes that's more than my metal Tiger, but I think between the standard ratio gears & smaller Sherman sprocket it will still be pretty nimble.
Old 09-25-2014, 02:08 AM
  #35  
karel47
 
karel47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ninove - outeroost vlaanderen, BELGIUM
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my tamiya's are also between 8 to 10 kg so I don't see problems n this way ... but hold your horses when announced a few months ago itwas stated that poeple could build in the electronics they want to, I looked the pics thouroughly fron the open hatches there are not seen any electronics into it ! clarks mfu is announced but do these models have traverse, rotating or lifting gun or ha ve a choise to build into ??? so many questions so little answers
  • Usual turret rotation and gun elevation options
  • Easy, tool less upper removal
​have you read this it says options

I they turn out good at reasonable prices I wait for the wolverine M10 and the achilles from mato

Last edited by karel47; 09-25-2014 at 02:13 AM.
Old 09-25-2014, 03:19 AM
  #36  
ausf
 
ausf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: , NY
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

As Jerry pointed out, Tamiya is a privately held company. 1/16 RC tanks is entirely a pet-project of Shunsaku Tamiya. If you accounted for sales in their departments, from a business standpoint, we wouldn't have a hobby today becuase Tamiya wouldn't make them and then there would be no knock-offs. In his book, the Tiger I holds a special place in his heart, but the 4WD racers saved the company. Military models remain a big part of their business, but a 1/48 Fiesler Storch is much more important to their bottom line.

Mr. Tamiya has retired to an advisory position, once he's gone, I doubt we'll see any new tanks. No one buys 1/16, if they did, the Kubel would still be on shelves. They make plenty in 1/72, 1/48 and 1/35.

As Dan stated above, Tamiya is the yardstick, and it's always hammered on price, so any commers should be compared on that alone. This Sherman, as was the Taigen, will always be looked at that first. If you don't want to be compared to Tamiya, release something Tamiya hasn't. No one compared Xion's Kettenkrad to Tamiya. And apparently, no one but me and Rivetcounter bought one either, so they're no longer in production.
Old 09-25-2014, 04:33 AM
  #37  
YHR
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
YHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, CANADA
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I have heard that the RTR Sherman will be available from Mato with Clark electronics C/W servo recoil, servo bbl elevation, and the Mato 2.4 gHz hobby grade radio.

You can get this three ways

No electronics
HL electronics
Clark electronics with all the servo stuff for recoil and bbl elevation.
Opening hatches
Scale handgrabs

Mato appear to have pulled at all the stops on this one. Exciting for me is that means Mato will be building servo recoil and elevation mechanisms that a guy will be able to purchase for other projects. These are still in China, and the electronics development is no doubt why this tank was delayed.

I am looking forward to the M36 and the M10 as well.

With all of the above, this is a hobbyist tank built for us . Murphy, like Mr Tamiya has a passion for tanks. We can be thankful for these guys, because without them our options would be slim to none. I don't know the guy behind Taigen, but it appears as if that is another guy that has a passion for tanks.

Now if we could just convince this guys to talk to each other and not duplicate releases!!!!

However I believe everyone wants to have a Tiger and a Sherman in their lineup

.
Old 09-25-2014, 04:41 AM
  #38  
Panther F
 
Panther F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Franklin, IN
Posts: 9,772
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YHR
I have heard that the RTR Sherman will be available from Mato with Clark electronics C/W servo recoil, servo bbl elevation, and the Mato 2.4 gHz hobby grade radio.

You can get this three ways

No electronics
HL electronics
Clark electronics with all the servo stuff for recoil and bbl elevation.
Opening hatches
Scale handgrabs

Mato appear to have pulled at all the stops on this one. Exciting for me is that means Mato will be building servo recoil and elevation mechanisms that a guy will be able to purchase for other projects. These are still in China, and the electronics development is no doubt why this tank was delayed.

I am looking forward to the M36 and the M10 as well.

With all of the above, this is a hobbyist tank built for us . Murphy, like Mr Tamiya has a passion for tanks. We can be thankful for these guys, because without them our options would be slim to none. I don't know the guy behind Taigen, but it appears as if that is another guy that has a passion for tanks.

Now if we could just convince this guys to talk to each other and not duplicate releases!!!!

However I believe everyone wants to have a Tiger and a Sherman in their lineup

.

Come on man. Barrel... just 3 more letters so we know EXACTLY what you're talking about.

We KNOW you're not talking about a barrel of oil being elevated, huh?




Jeff
Old 09-25-2014, 04:54 AM
  #39  
YHR
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
YHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, CANADA
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

LOL, old habits
Old 09-25-2014, 05:16 AM
  #40  
Panther F
 
Panther F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Franklin, IN
Posts: 9,772
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

I'm not trying to be the spell police (and I wouldn't start with you) but if you want to be taken serious...





Jeff
Old 09-25-2014, 05:19 AM
  #41  
Cruiser133
 
Cruiser133's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have wanted a Jagdpanther for a LONG time, but the reason I have not bought one yet is I cannot afford a Tamiya and I just will not buy an alternative if Tamiya makes one. I too have supported the others if they make a model that Tamiya does not have. For instance, I have a Taigen, Hooben, Mato, Matorro, several HL's, Profiline, Juckenburg, Asiatam, ect. Again, all stuff Tamiya does not make and I think in the Hobby World, I am not alone. Tamiya IS the bench standard. Like YHR stated, I wish the other manufactures would talk to broaden our choices since it seems Tamiya is slow to respond....
Old 09-25-2014, 05:20 AM
  #42  
YHR
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
YHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, CANADA
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

LOL


There are creative writers and then there are editors. As grammar and spelling seem to be a moving target historically( even more so today with text to text spelling) no point losing too much sleep over it.

I type fast and have fat fingers, Even if I get the spelling right half the time the fingers are striking some other key on the keyboard

You are right though. To be taken seriously grammar and spelling are important. On this forum, I respond quickly and only proof what I have written when I see it quoted.

Last edited by YHR; 09-25-2014 at 05:24 AM.
Old 09-25-2014, 05:28 AM
  #43  
Panther F
 
Panther F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Franklin, IN
Posts: 9,772
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Same here... thank gawd for automatic spell check!

But still the same, we are not the only ones that read these threads. I've seen people commit on FB (uh, that's Face Book people) that they read on RC Universe something and I KNOW they are not members here. LOL


Just trying to add a little polish there Dan. Forgive me, okay? It won't happen again!


BTW... how is that SU-85 project coming along?




Jeff
Old 09-25-2014, 05:35 AM
  #44  
karel47
 
karel47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ninove - outeroost vlaanderen, BELGIUM
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

tamiya have lately done some nice projects on 1/16 like the suberb JS2 one of their best yet made ... what will be the next step forward ... still WOII like a hellcat or more modern like their leopard series ... in a few years we will know ... until then we can dream and debate over it
Old 09-25-2014, 05:39 AM
  #45  
YHR
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
YHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, CANADA
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Panther F
Same here... thank gawd for automatic spell check!

But still the same, we are not the only ones that read these threads. I've seen people commit on FB (uh, that's Face Book people) that they read on RC Universe something and I KNOW they are not members here. LOL


Just trying to add a little polish there Dan. Forgive me, okay? It won't happen again!


BTW... how is that SU-85 project coming along?




Jeff
I actually purchased the Taigen metal T-34 hull for it. Just waiting on that to arrive.
Old 09-25-2014, 05:49 AM
  #46  
Panther F
 
Panther F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Franklin, IN
Posts: 9,772
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Really? Did you give up on the WSN/DT set up for the lower chassis?

I'm still working on mine.




Jeff
Old 09-25-2014, 07:36 AM
  #47  
YHR
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
YHR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, CANADA
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Panther F
Really? Did you give up on the WSN/DT set up for the lower chassis?

I'm still working on mine.




Jeff
Well I used that for my '42 76mm, but I thought I would give this Taigen set up a try. I have to reward them with my wallet for the effort they are putting in.
Old 09-25-2014, 09:27 AM
  #48  
Lord Haw-Haw
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I hope all these Sherman's and with the Brad Pitt movie coming out soon will draw more people to RC tank'ing. ...Filling the pockets of suppliers and funding some more obscure tank types.
Old 09-26-2014, 11:10 PM
  #49  
clarkmodel
 
clarkmodel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Hsinchu County, TAIWAN
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I will film a Mato M4 battle with Tamiya Tiger 131 video when Mato M4 sample arrived.

In IT world, we usually don't take customer relationship, so I can not comment on this.

Regards,
Clark

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.