ESM Dauntless
#151
Beauty (and acceptance) is in the eye of the beholder. 1:6 doesn't look right to my eye, nor does the math suggest so. But, if it looks great to you, I'm happy it works out.
This Dauntless has been back ordered for quite a while? Hmmmm... Wonder if they'll discontinue it? I sure would like to see a bigger one. ...Or a big Helldiver!
This Dauntless has been back ordered for quite a while? Hmmmm... Wonder if they'll discontinue it? I sure would like to see a bigger one. ...Or a big Helldiver!
#152
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just bought a ESM dauntless. forgive me, but i'm confused on the CofG position. the instruction's say 125MM but some people are saying 115mm or 120mm. well how's rite and how's wrong? i'd like to get this critical demotion rite, if you know what I mean. thanks for your help!!
#153
Best bet to go conservative at first. ESM has been notorious for listing CGs way too far aft over the years. If ppl say 115 or 120, I'd go with that... Maybe split the difference and go 118.
Last thing you want is tail heavy and after you maiden, you can adjust it.
Last thing you want is tail heavy and after you maiden, you can adjust it.
#154
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks for the advice guys!! I do have a esm sky raider and flies great. I used the instruction manual's CofG dimension (120mm) it seem to b correct. what concerns me the most is this. that if there many aircraft in the esm and vq inventory that have " wrong CofG" dimensions. one can only wonder about there engineering staff. not to mention the R and D department. you would think that this company would want to manufacture a high quality product not "junk". makes me wonder how much longer they'll be in business, with the a lack luster run company. sorry, I'll get off my soap box now.