43cc warbird??
#1
Thread Starter

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: fort worth,
TX
Hey guys I am wanting to get my first warbird and not sure where to start:
I have a SPE 43cc motor that just came out of an 80" Geebee that runs great and needs a new home. I have been looking at ESM, Vq warbirds, BH Models and a bunch of other lesser know sites, and the problem I am running across is that most of there 75" to 80" birds are suggesting 26 to 32 cc motors. I really like the looks of the Stuka from all 3 companies above but is the 43 just way to much motor?
Thanks
I have a SPE 43cc motor that just came out of an 80" Geebee that runs great and needs a new home. I have been looking at ESM, Vq warbirds, BH Models and a bunch of other lesser know sites, and the problem I am running across is that most of there 75" to 80" birds are suggesting 26 to 32 cc motors. I really like the looks of the Stuka from all 3 companies above but is the 43 just way to much motor?
Thanks
#3
FYI
Most wings and fuselages on model warbirds between 70 and 85 inch are stronger than 100 inch aerobatic airplanes which fly with 100cc +...
Warbirds are flown very gentle compare to the areobatic airplanes
Almost all engine size recommendations of MFG are based on the minimum to fly that model.
Most wings and fuselages on model warbirds between 70 and 85 inch are stronger than 100 inch aerobatic airplanes which fly with 100cc +...
Warbirds are flown very gentle compare to the areobatic airplanes
Almost all engine size recommendations of MFG are based on the minimum to fly that model.
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (15)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston,
TX
The CMP AT6 will work well with a 43cc engine. Running a Poulan 42 cc in mine and it needed a little bit of nose weight added. I fly nose heavy anyway. G -Pete provided the radial engine and it runs really well. Besides, there is no such thing as too much motor ! Paul
#5

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Summerfield,
NC
The 43cc will be perfect for the Stuka. The ESM is a much nicer bird than the BH Models. Get yourself a 20X10 threebladed prop and you'll be all set and no retracts to worry about. I'd recommend the B model over the D model. Should be a great flyer, enjoy it.
#6

My Feedback: (7)
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ORIGINAL: G-Pete
NO
I fly a 50cc in a KMP 71" FW190 - still needed nose weight. Better more motor than dead weight.
You will be fine!
NO
I fly a 50cc in a KMP 71" FW190 - still needed nose weight. Better more motor than dead weight.
You will be fine!
edit: seriously, My dad has a 86" P-51, the 73" 109 is closest in actual scale than anything available Iam aware of.. The plane handles a DLE 30cc just fine but Iwonder about the speed and power differences..
#10
Speaking of FW 190 and Moki 250
When the guys hang on the Airworld 102inch FW 190 Moki's with 215 and 250cc everyone goes gaga and drools - not one word about "over-powered"
But when you mount a 50cc on a 71 inch - a bird just 70% , 50% of the weight - the engine 5(!!) times smaller in displacement and only 30% of the weight - that is wrong......
hahahahaha
the 50 cc fits completely in the cowl of the KMP
When the guys hang on the Airworld 102inch FW 190 Moki's with 215 and 250cc everyone goes gaga and drools - not one word about "over-powered"
But when you mount a 50cc on a 71 inch - a bird just 70% , 50% of the weight - the engine 5(!!) times smaller in displacement and only 30% of the weight - that is wrong......
hahahahaha
the 50 cc fits completely in the cowl of the KMP

#12

My Feedback: (2)
I've got my SPE 40cc in my CMpro 71" Fw-190, not problems at all, And I'm also still carrying lead in the nose!! It flies great and spins the 18x8 3-blade prop with ease. That's why I over engined, so I could spin a larger prop and make it look just that little bit better
If I had my time again, I would not hesitate for one second to do it again.
Thanks
dave
If I had my time again, I would not hesitate for one second to do it again.
Thanks
dave
#16

My Feedback: (2)
ORIGINAL: ZERO-322
love the third pic with the B-17 in the backround ! really cool !
I was suprised to see a 40 cc cowl in a 71'' plane so perfectly nicely done indeed !
love the third pic with the B-17 in the backround ! really cool !
I was suprised to see a 40 cc cowl in a 71'' plane so perfectly nicely done indeed !
It would have been great to see the same scale models in the air.Thanks
dave
#17

My Feedback: (35)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: West Monroe,
LA
ORIGINAL: ticketec
I've got my SPE 40cc in my CMpro 71'' Fw-190, not problems at all, And I'm also still carrying lead in the nose!! It flies great and spins the 18x8 3-blade prop with ease. That's why I over engined, so I could spin a larger prop and make it look just that little bit better
If I had my time again, I would not hesitate for one second to do it again.
Thanks
dave
I've got my SPE 40cc in my CMpro 71'' Fw-190, not problems at all, And I'm also still carrying lead in the nose!! It flies great and spins the 18x8 3-blade prop with ease. That's why I over engined, so I could spin a larger prop and make it look just that little bit better
If I had my time again, I would not hesitate for one second to do it again.
Thanks
dave
#18
Does anybody know where I can find an 80" wingspan FW-190 ARF? I've got an electric power system that weighs 4.8 lbs ( motor + batteries + esc + prop/spinner ). It's the equivalent of a 1.60.
#19
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Jose,
CA
ESM is coming out with a Fw-190D in the spring. VQ and YT will have them sometime in March they think. Should be a perfect plane for an electric setup. They also have a great P-39 that is another great plane for electric since the nose is so small.
Jeff
Jeff
#20
I have a Fuji 43cc EI in a Willhobby FW190 with 72" wingspan. It flies great with this motor combo. Was a real dog with Fuji 32cc in it before that.
Just remember to use big motor in radial cowled planes and you will not have a problem hiding it in the cowl.
Great choices will be Zero, corsair, FW, etc.
By the way, I'm glad you found an SPE 43cc that runs well. Mine was a dog compared to the Fuji 43cc, could not even give it away to any club members.
Just remember to use big motor in radial cowled planes and you will not have a problem hiding it in the cowl.
Great choices will be Zero, corsair, FW, etc.
By the way, I'm glad you found an SPE 43cc that runs well. Mine was a dog compared to the Fuji 43cc, could not even give it away to any club members.
#22
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cerritos,
CA
ORIGINAL: G-Pete
NO
I fly a 50cc in a KMP 71'' FW190 - still needed nose weight. Better more motor than dead weight.
You will be fine!<br type=''_moz''/>
NO
I fly a 50cc in a KMP 71'' FW190 - still needed nose weight. Better more motor than dead weight.
You will be fine!<br type=''_moz''/>
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Jose,
CA
That motor would also be perfect for the Hanger 9 P-47. A great flying plane and there's enough room in the cowl to fit that motor in. Just make sure you throw away the retracts and get some air operated ones from Robart or Sierra.
Jeff
Jeff
#24
[link=http://www.vqwarbirds.com/product_info.php?cPath=31&products_id=78&osCsid=4f 7198425089c58ff68bb1aa3ad8df2e]EMS La-7[/link] is perfect for that 43cc.


