Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Top RC Zero from Gator R/C

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Top RC Zero from Gator R/C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2021, 03:44 PM
  #926  
TimD.
My Feedback: (207)
 
TimD.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Nice Video !
Old 10-27-2021, 03:59 PM
  #927  
mackone
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 59
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Great Video Darod !!
Old 10-28-2021, 01:33 AM
  #928  
darod07
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , POLAND
Posts: 162
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Thanks guys! I'm glad you like it. This year I've made nearly 100 flights and model performs just great. Winter slowly coming so it's time to put Zero on the shelf. For next season I'm planning to install smoke pump. If only there will be enough room for additional tank....
Old 11-16-2021, 12:00 PM
  #929  
blackbox747
 
blackbox747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 31
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Hi everyone,

about engine weight vs CG...: With a Saito FG84/FG90 installed, is there any additional weight in the front required to balance the plane at +/- 150mm?
A Saito FG90 has a weight of around 3,5kg, including ignition and Keleo exhaust. If there is still some more weight needed in the front, I could try to fit my Moki S150, which has a weight of 4,5kg including accessories... Power would be more than enough, even too much. But the sound is even better when flying half throttle only.

Regards,
Juergen
Old 11-16-2021, 12:19 PM
  #930  
CK1
My Feedback: (60)
 
CK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,552
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Yes you will need to add additional weight up front if using the FG90 or the FG84 . I had to add several pounds of weight up front with my FG90 as well as placing all batteries , etc...as far forward in the fuselage as possible .
Old 11-16-2021, 12:33 PM
  #931  
drorso
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

My friend (Israel Shaked) had the Zero with Moki 150. He didn't have to add any weight.

However, besides the overpower, the torque is very high, with the huge prop, it was not easy to fly. Also, he had to cut openings in the cowl for the valves covers. Not nice....
Old 11-16-2021, 01:01 PM
  #932  
darod07
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , POLAND
Posts: 162
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I wonder If you manage to install Moki engine without making any surgery to the cowling. I agree that it would sound better then Saito. But if you have to make an extra cut outs for valve covers.... I would rather fit Saito. Additional weight for correct CG is not a big deal. Saito FG 90 has enough power to fly this model scale like. With Moki will be overpowered... please consider airframe strength. I've read that some models disintegrated during flight.
Old 11-16-2021, 01:06 PM
  #933  
limodune
 
limodune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: toowoomba queensland Australia
Posts: 134
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Nice fun video , well done

Mike
Old 11-16-2021, 01:16 PM
  #934  
CK1
My Feedback: (60)
 
CK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,552
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drorso
My friend (Israel Shaked) had the Zero with Moki 150. He didn't have to add any weight.

However, besides the overpower, the torque is very high, with the huge prop, it was not easy to fly. Also, he had to cut openings in the cowl for the valves covers. Not nice....
I believe the Moki 150 weighs about 2 pounds more than the Saito FG90 so with careful placement of everything else it's very possible that no additional weight was needed with the 150 to achieve a flyable CG
Old 11-16-2021, 02:38 PM
  #935  
blackbox747
 
blackbox747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 31
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by darod07
I wonder If you manage to install Moki engine without making any surgery to the cowling. I agree that it would sound better then Saito. But if you have to make an extra cut outs for valve covers.... I would rather fit Saito. Additional weight for correct CG is not a big deal. Saito FG 90 has enough power to fly this model scale like. With Moki will be overpowered... please consider airframe strength. I've read that some models disintegrated during flight.
Saito FG90 has a diameter of 250mm, Moki has 255... I saw a picture of somebody fitting the cowl with a Tygon fuel line around the Saito... so maybe the Moki could fit.
Airframe strength has to be considered, of course.

Old 12-01-2021, 02:26 PM
  #936  
blackbox747
 
blackbox747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 31
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Ok.... I tried, but the Moki won't fit. FG90 is a perfect fit
Old 12-02-2021, 07:38 PM
  #937  
Jaketab
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 571
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Gentlemen, need some quick advice please. I have the Saito FG90 on order and may have found a TRC Zero. From skimming over this thread briefly I have some questions please.
1. Retracts. Robart has the electric gear package that includes the tailwheel and spinner. Yes or no? What gear should I avoid??? What is the best gear option???
2. Sierra Gear - Yes or no? Sierra may or may not be able to provide the tailwheel at present.
3. The cowl needs to be the newer version to fit the Saito. Do the recently made Zero's come with the larger cowl?
4. What other accessories do you recommend to order with the plane???
5. Any other quick advice before I pull the trigger.

Thanks and regards,
J. Tab

Old 12-03-2021, 05:01 AM
  #938  
darod07
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , POLAND
Posts: 162
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jaketab
Gentlemen, need some quick advice please. I have the Saito FG90 on order and may have found a TRC Zero. From skimming over this thread briefly I have some questions please.
1. Retracts. Robart has the electric gear package that includes the tailwheel and spinner. Yes or no? What gear should I avoid??? What is the best gear option???
2. Sierra Gear - Yes or no? Sierra may or may not be able to provide the tailwheel at present.
3. The cowl needs to be the newer version to fit the Saito. Do the recently made Zero's come with the larger cowl?
4. What other accessories do you recommend to order with the plane???
5. Any other quick advice before I pull the trigger.

Thanks and regards,
J. Tab
1. I don't know know Robart gear performance but with this combo set and considering price looks interesting. For sure avoid Top RC gear set ( retracts & struts) - very poor quality. I purchased only Top RC tailwheel retracts. Need some fiberglassing and reinforcments of tail part of fuselage and so far no issues. For me best main retracts is Electron Evo 40. Bit pricy but worth every cent spent on it. I have self made struts - much heavier then Robart or Sierra.. I've made nearly 100 flights, some hard landings. Never had any issues with Electron retracts. I have small gear bay door under spring load (not operated by servo as designed by Top RC). Even with this additional load for Electron mechanism all is working perfect regardless speed of the plane in the air.
2. I would prefer Sierra gear then Robart - looks much more scale like. Tailwheel retracts from Top RC are acceptable.
3.I believe all newly manufactured models have bigger cowl but it's better to confirm with your dealer shop.
4. Good retracts with dedicated wheels + Top RC spinner ( quite heavy but it will help with balancing, for sure you will need extra lead in front of the cowl) . For others it depends on your needs but no dedicated accessories are required.
5.
- Reinforcement of tail part of fuselage (where tailwheel retracts is mounted)
- Additional dowel on the leading edge at the root of the wings.
- Get rid of crappy 2,6x12 mm screws made of "chinesium" and use good quality
Old 12-03-2021, 10:44 AM
  #939  
Jaketab
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 571
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

darod07 - Thanks for taking the time to reply. Great info.
The Robart package looks good for the convenience, but it's has some bad reviews when searching through the forums.
Below are links to the Robart retracts. Possibly someone can comment their experience with the electrics.
Something I notice from the pictures is the Robart struts have the elbow knuckle on the side which would interfere with the closing of the gear doors.
Regards - J Tab

Top R/C Zero 93" Accessories select from the drop down below – Robart Manufacturing
570302ASP (shopify.com)
160WCZESP (shopify.com)



Old 12-03-2021, 12:47 PM
  #940  
darod07
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , POLAND
Posts: 162
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jaketab
Something I notice from the pictures is the Robart struts have the elbow knuckle on the side which would interfere with the closing of the gear doors....
I think you mean torque links will interfere with gear doors? In fact robart design of strut is quite scale like, the only thing is torque link is too long and middle joint will extend to the side while working under load. I know somebody found clever solution:

Old 12-03-2021, 01:04 PM
  #941  
Jaketab
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 571
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by darod07
I think you mean torque links will interfere with gear doors? In fact robart design of strut is quite scale like, the only thing is torque link is too long and middle joint will extend to the side while working under load. I know somebody found clever solution:
Clever. I went back and looked at the post. It would require making a top side mounting ring attachment with a hinge so the door can swing outward.
Unfortunately, I don't have a machine shop to fab one. Could this hardware be available somewhere?
Old 12-03-2021, 01:32 PM
  #942  
darod07
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , POLAND
Posts: 162
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

You don't need any hinge. To attach upper part of door to the strut you can use piece of steel sheet and make a band which you wrap around the strut. Band has to be glued to the strut. Ends of the band you screw to the wooden block attached to the door. Screw will be pivot point of the door when lower part will swing outward.



This is what I did in mine. But because door in my case are not moving at all I used thin aluminium sheet wrapped around the strut just to keep the door attached. In your case this wooden block part must not touch the strut at all. I hope it's clear enough.

Last edited by darod07; 12-03-2021 at 01:40 PM.
Old 12-16-2021, 06:55 PM
  #943  
LtMash1A
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 241
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Anyone use carbon fiber wing tubes to replace the aluminum ones? I know Gator RC sells them but not sure about the sizing.















Old 12-16-2021, 07:50 PM
  #944  
bradley
My Feedback: (-1)
 
bradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 135
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Lightbulb Carbon Fiber

I replaced all 4 tubes with Carbon Fiber. Saved ~ 400 grams on all 4 total.
Top RC Aluminum ones are insanely heavy. Spent a lot of time looking at CF tubes to to get it right .They were perfect. lots of successful flights on the CF tubes with Aerobatics too.
Brad


Amazon

2 of these needed

"><img src=" /> ">
2
WHABEST 100% Roll Wrapped Carbon Fiber Tube 30mm OD x 26mm ID x 1000mm Long 3k Matt Surface WHABEST 100% Roll Wrapped Carbon Fiber Tube 30mm OD x 26mm ID x 1000mm Long 3k Matt Surface
Manufacturer: WHABEST Carbon Fiber
Sold by:
WHABEST Carbon Fiber Supplier WHABEST Carbon Fiber Supplier

Return window closed on Nov. 11, 2020
CDN$ 46.88
Condition: New

1 of this one needed.


"><img src=" /> ">
WHABEST 20mm OD X 17mm ID X 1000mm Carbon Fiber Tube 3K Roll Wrapped Matt Pipe WHABEST 20mm OD X 17mm ID X 1000mm Carbon Fiber Tube 3K Roll Wrapped Matt Pipe
Manufacturer: WHABEST Carbon Fiber
Sold by:
WHABEST Carbon Fiber Supplier WHABEST Carbon Fiber Supplier

Return window closed on Nov. 11, 2020
CDN$ 25.99
Condition: New
Attached Images   
Old 12-17-2021, 07:53 AM
  #945  
darod07
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , POLAND
Posts: 162
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I ordered my carbon tubes from www.rjxhobby.com

They can make exact size and length you need.
Old 12-22-2021, 12:41 PM
  #946  
darod07
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , POLAND
Posts: 162
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Hi guys,

Finally I found place for smoke fluid tank so started to work on smoke system. Smoke pump already installed. Additional 500ml tank will be on top of fuel tank. I fabricated another exhaust ring for Saito, smoke nozzle is also self made of brass. I hope it will give visible ammount of smoke.
Another thing which was forgotten...finally my Zero got an arrestor hook😀




The following users liked this post:
bradley (12-22-2021)
Old 01-08-2022, 08:54 AM
  #947  
darod07
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , POLAND
Posts: 162
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Smoke system is ready. The only inconvenience is that I have to remove upper tank every time before battery placement and engine priming. But this is mostly done only in the begining and at the end of flying day, so no big issue. Smoke pump will make fluid tank empty within 2 minutes with present setting. It's nearly 0 outside, once temp rise I'll try how it works in the garden.
Old 01-08-2022, 09:13 AM
  #948  
CK1
My Feedback: (60)
 
CK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,552
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I see that you must have sacrificed the luxurious (Not..) cockpit to be able to get that tank in there !
Old 01-08-2022, 10:08 AM
  #949  
darod07
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: , POLAND
Posts: 162
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CK1
I see that you must have sacrificed the luxurious (Not..) cockpit to be able to get that tank in there !
Nope 😁. Cockpit fits perfectly with additional tank. Otherwise I would scrap smoke project. Cockpit starts just behind the walls of both tanks and no anu modification was necessarry.
Old 01-08-2022, 11:09 AM
  #950  
CK1
My Feedback: (60)
 
CK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,552
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

We must have different cockpits . Mine had to be trimmed bck several inches in the feet /pedal area to clear the fuel tank


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.