vq zero engine selection
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: springfield, MO
heres a dumb question
, i am planning on building a vq zero, the arf calls for a .40 -.46 2 stroke or a .70 4 .
a lot of people have been moving the servo tray forward in these, so they dont have to add so much weight to the nose,
so why cant i just use a bigger engine? why not a .60 2stroke?
also, what is better for this type of plane for more maneuverability? 2strokes or four?
, i am planning on building a vq zero, the arf calls for a .40 -.46 2 stroke or a .70 4 .
a lot of people have been moving the servo tray forward in these, so they dont have to add so much weight to the nose,
so why cant i just use a bigger engine? why not a .60 2stroke?
also, what is better for this type of plane for more maneuverability? 2strokes or four?
#3
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: springfield, MO
which has more power? the ys63 or the saito82?
also, i have not used a 4-stroke engine before, are they a real pain to maintain and tune?
also, i have not used a 4-stroke engine before, are they a real pain to maintain and tune?
#6

My Feedback: (17)
I swung a 13x7 with mine on a pattern ship. Will probablly pull up to a shallow 14 but you're gonna run into ground clearance issues going that big. I flew a VQ Macchi which is about the same weight and wingspan with an AX .46 and it was more than enough power. .61 will get you into flutter speeds quickly, as will an .82 with the wrong prop.
Andy
Andy
#7

My Feedback: (5)
I have a Magnum .61 two-stroke in my VQ Zero with an APC 12x7 prop. Goes like a guided missile! Has to be going over 100 mph. I strengthened the stab by epoxying two strips of thin plywood to the bottom. And I also fiberglassed the center of the wing. I have flown it 25 or 30 times and the only problem is that the plastic parts are starting to crack. But I think that would happen with time no matter what engine you used.
I would be flying it now except I dorked it on a take-off roll, of all things! Didn't watch my rudder and it rolled into the grass and flipped. Not too bad, just knocked the stab loose and crunched one wingtip. Just haven't gotten around to fixing it yet.
As for manueverability, I don't think the engine choice (2 or 4 stroke) would have much effect on it. It's a great flying plane!
I would be flying it now except I dorked it on a take-off roll, of all things! Didn't watch my rudder and it rolled into the grass and flipped. Not too bad, just knocked the stab loose and crunched one wingtip. Just haven't gotten around to fixing it yet.
As for manueverability, I don't think the engine choice (2 or 4 stroke) would have much effect on it. It's a great flying plane!
#8
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: springfield, MO
so what have you guys do for scale-ish mufflers?
the pitts dual tips are everywhere, but can you get ww2 specific mufflers?
the pitts dual tips are everywhere, but can you get ww2 specific mufflers?
#9
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: springfield, MO
i may end up using something like an evolution .61 , 4strokes are just imtimidating to me, too many parts, too much to tune.
#10

My Feedback: (5)
I use the Slimline sport scale muffler on mine:
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXFH00&P=0
It doesn't 'muffle' as well as the stock muffler, but it does have a nice sound and it fits well inside the cowel. I used silicon tubing for the last couple inches of the output tubes, so that I can get the cowel on over it.
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXFH00&P=0
It doesn't 'muffle' as well as the stock muffler, but it does have a nice sound and it fits well inside the cowel. I used silicon tubing for the last couple inches of the output tubes, so that I can get the cowel on over it.




