Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

TF engine choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2007 | 02:42 PM
  #1  
vasek's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Montreal, CANADA
Default TF engine choice

I want to give the RCV engines a try, the objective being swinging an 4 blade prop.

The RCV SP series seems like a good candidate since the Fury cowling would provide direct cooling. The question is should I get the 90 SP or the 120 SP ?

has anyone tried one of these in TF kit?

Old 10-16-2007 | 04:40 PM
  #2  
P-40 DRIVER's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Cedar Park, TX
Default RE: TF engine choice

The Sea fury swung a 5 bladed prop so a 4 bladed prop would be as stupid as a 2 bladed prop. Save your money and give up on the scale prop stuff. Make a nice static prop. Having said that, I would go for the 120. Yes I know, the Sea Furies that have non original engines swing 4 bladed props.
Old 10-16-2007 | 08:24 PM
  #3  
Tommy_Gun's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Locust Grove, Va
Default RE: TF engine choice

Vasek,

I don't know if "stupid" would describe using a 4 bladed prop on this plane with that engine.

I would however suggest seeking an answer from the engine distributor to see what they might suggest for this installation.
Old 10-16-2007 | 08:35 PM
  #4  
prop wash's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Griffith, IN
Default RE: TF engine choice

WOW!!! Tom
Old 10-16-2007 | 08:59 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lehi, UT
Default RE: TF engine choice

If you're going to throw that much money down on an engine I would go for a YS 110.
Old 10-16-2007 | 10:08 PM
  #6  
saramos's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,057
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Northridge, CA
Default RE: TF engine choice

For the Sea Fury, I would suggest the 120 over the 90. RCV SPs are one of only two ways to use a large multi blade prop on a plane this size. The other way is to go electric, which would be a bit more expensive.
Old 10-17-2007 | 07:27 AM
  #7  
vasek's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Montreal, CANADA
Default RE: TF engine choice

Thanks saramos for the informative answer! I also think this combo should work well

as for those who use the word "stupid" instead of "I don't know" well....

Cheers, Vasek
Old 10-17-2007 | 07:56 AM
  #8  
vasek's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Montreal, CANADA
Default RE: TF engine choice

BTW I believe 4blades look cool on the fury
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Yw66568.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	54.8 KB
ID:	784697   Click image for larger version

Name:	Rm37119.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	48.8 KB
ID:	784698  
Old 10-17-2007 | 08:17 AM
  #9  
rrudytoo's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Simpsonville, SC
Default RE: TF engine choice

vasek,

There is an RCV 120SP up for bid on eBay now. As I write this there are four days remaining and the bid is up to $202. According to the information the engine's owner provided, the RCV 120 can swing a 15.5 X 12 four-blade prop. He used this engine in an ARF Hellcat with a 72" wingspan and said it flew his plane well. And, no, it's not my engine.

I'll throw in my dos centavos here with regard to the number of prop blades. Once the engine is running, no one will know how many blades are turning. In our models, being considerably smaller than their full-size counterparts, a two-blade prop is much more efficient than a prop of three or four blades. Let's face it, a full-scale designer, racer or fighter pilot would kill to have the power to weight ratio we enjoy with our models. While P-40 Driver may share the sensitivity of my supervisor at work, I have to agree that a static prop would be your best bet while your Fury is parked in the pits. But, hey. That's just me.

Al
Old 10-18-2007 | 09:06 AM
  #10  
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,821
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St.Charles, MO
Default RE: TF engine choice

The thing about scale props is that if it is truly the scale blade length (good luck finding a 4 blade prop that big) there isn't any engine appropriate for this size plane that could turn it.
Old 10-18-2007 | 09:26 AM
  #11  
saramos's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,057
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Northridge, CA
Default RE: TF engine choice

True, this prop isn't completely scale, but I still think it's far better looking than the typical 13-14" 2 blade found on most planes this size.

Scott
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Rp43575.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	88.3 KB
ID:	785348   Click image for larger version

Name:	Pn36892.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	66.2 KB
ID:	785349  
Old 10-18-2007 | 01:50 PM
  #12  
vasek's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Montreal, CANADA
Default RE: TF engine choice

Looks really nice saramos

do you have any pics of the engine install?
Old 10-18-2007 | 06:46 PM
  #13  
saramos's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,057
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Northridge, CA
Default RE: TF engine choice

Here ya go. There are two issues with the RCV engine. One is, the glow plug is uncomfortably close to the prop, and RCV recommends the use of a remote glow. I chose to build an onboard glow using a microswitch which is activated with a wheel collar on the throttle linkage and a Nimh battery. The other issue is cooling a fully cowled engine. To resolve this, I use a small electric ducted fan with it's own ecs and lipo battery to exhaust the hot air out the bottom of the cowl. For the air inlet, I did not cut any holes in the cowl, I left a slightly larger gap between the spinner backplate and the front of the cowl. The cooling works well. Another thing to be aware of is the way the RCV mounts. I ended up making an extention to the engine mount box to place the engine in the right spot. I reinforced the box with carbon veil.

Scott
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Lj22615.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	411.4 KB
ID:	785610   Click image for larger version

Name:	Id95738.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	423.5 KB
ID:	785611   Click image for larger version

Name:	Rw58185.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	259.6 KB
ID:	785612   Click image for larger version

Name:	Un34243.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	209.7 KB
ID:	785613   Click image for larger version

Name:	Rc40563.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	346.0 KB
ID:	785614  
Old 10-18-2007 | 06:51 PM
  #14  
saramos's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,057
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Northridge, CA
Default RE: TF engine choice

Gee, what's up with the photos?
Old 10-18-2007 | 07:27 PM
  #15  
My Feedback: (42)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC
Default RE: TF engine choice

Vasek,

I've got a Bolly 15x12.5 with a RCV91SP on my 1/8 TF P-51 and it works great. I had to be careful with the baffling for cooling though, the RCV tends to need a lot of cooling. I agree with Saramos, a 4 blade prop would look a lot cooler than a 2 blade.
Old 10-19-2007 | 01:39 AM
  #16  
SMUGator's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,412
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle WA
Default RE: TF engine choice


ORIGINAL: rrudytoo

vasek,

There is an RCV 120SP up for bid on eBay now. As I write this there are four days remaining and the bid is up to $202. According to the information the engine's owner provided, the RCV 120 can swing a 15.5 X 12 four-blade prop. He used this engine in an ARF Hellcat with a 72" wingspan and said it flew his plane well. And, no, it's not my engine.
The one on e-bay looks like one of the earlier versions. The design has been improved a bit over the past 3-4 yrs. Before bidding, you might ask how old it is and then ask about the issues you "might" run into on the RCV Support forum.
Old 10-19-2007 | 07:53 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , MA
Default RE: TF engine choice

Saramos,

That's a nice looking spitfire. Would you share some details about the plane? I'm working on a kmp 1/7 scale and a yellow 1/5 scale project. Would like to run a 4-5 blade prop like you have. What kit /arf do have and could you show me some pictures of your set up. looks like a working radio hatch door, etc. Any info would be much appreciated. It would be nice if there was a place on rcu to get complete specs on some of these well built, succesful performers. Would save a lot of guess work, research, and the reinventing of the wheel. Also any line on a really good, light-weight, scale like, air operated, retractable tail wheel?


Thanks,

Rick
Old 10-19-2007 | 09:27 AM
  #18  
saramos's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,057
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Northridge, CA
Default RE: TF engine choice

Hi Rick.
I built this from the Top Flite Gold edition kit. Retracts are Robart 605s with struts and dave brown wheels. I made my own radiators because I didn't like the shape of the kit ones, too boxy. I also skinned the ailerons because the Mk IV has metal covered ailerons. I added a hatch where the radio hatch is located on the Spit. It's hinged using a couple of dubro hinges, held shut with a catch made of a plastic tube and a small epoxy lump on the frame. I mounted a rare earth magnet in the hatch so I can open it with almost any metal tool. The exhaust stack was made by creating a model of one stack using modeling clay. I then made a silicon mold and cast resin parts. I then hollowed them out, mounted them on a strip of styrene, cut out the original stacks and mounted the replacements. I made a detachable chin scoop by shaping it out of florest foam, then fiberglassing over it and then removing the foam. It's held on with rare earth magnets and removed for flight (it covers the exhaust pipe and exhaust fan). The plane is glassed with .7 oz glass and West Systems epoxy. I used Duplicolor primers for filling the weave and making surface details. The Panel lines were made with 1/64" chart tape and primer for the butt joints and masking tape and primer for the lap joints. The rivets are 'burned-in' using a small brass tube mounted to the tip of an iron (I used the Top Flite trim iron). The paint was airbrushed latex exterior house paint color matched from a book I found that had all the Brittish color chips. The scheme is MK732 painted as H-25 of the RNAF cerca 1950. The markings and weathering are done with Humbrol and Model Masters paints. It's all clearcoated using a satin waterbased polyurethane. The cockpit was scratch built, and the pilot is from Century Jets. All up weight is 10 lbs 10 oz. There's some photo in my gallery, and I made a number of posts in Tubig's TF Spitfire Build thread during construction. This was my first scale build.

Scott
Old 10-19-2007 | 10:06 AM
  #19  
vasek's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Montreal, CANADA
Default RE: TF engine choice

Indeed saramos, that's a good loking plane!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.