Picking a scale...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Dunlap,
IL
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Picking a scale...
I'm wondering if people with multiple warbirds built them all to one scale?
I'm thinking about a first warbird and am wondering how big is too big. And after I pick the first one, should the others be the same scale, or just scale them to a "nice" wingspan?
To me, 1/6 looks to be about right for all the "major" single engine WWII fighters. The range is from 85 1/2" for the Hellcat to 57 1/2" for the Wildcat. Although only 2, the P47 and the F6F would be larger than 80". But I don't think that will be a problem. Going to 1/5 takes the upper end to 103" and that might be too big for my taste.
What are people's thoughts?
Kerry
I'm thinking about a first warbird and am wondering how big is too big. And after I pick the first one, should the others be the same scale, or just scale them to a "nice" wingspan?
To me, 1/6 looks to be about right for all the "major" single engine WWII fighters. The range is from 85 1/2" for the Hellcat to 57 1/2" for the Wildcat. Although only 2, the P47 and the F6F would be larger than 80". But I don't think that will be a problem. Going to 1/5 takes the upper end to 103" and that might be too big for my taste.
What are people's thoughts?
Kerry
#2
My Feedback: (2)
What scale
Kerrydel, I doubt if any one would pick a single scale to build all their planes too. Couple of reasons come to mind but what people are more inclined to do is to build the planes to near the same size.. regardless of scale. Reasons being availability of engines, plans, retracts.. etc.. BobH.
#3
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silver Lake, KS
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Picking a scale...
Kerry, I have only done this once so far. I have a 10th scale B-17 ( 10ft span ) and I purposely built a 10th scale P-51 to display with it. While the little .20 size Mustang is built to fly, I have never flown it with the 17.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Dunlap,
IL
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Picking a scale...
I hadn't thought about the engine and retracts issue. Didn't think that finding plans would be that big of a deal. You can always scale them up or down if you can't find the exact size.
Any idea what is a popular "size" (wingspan)? I can't see myself buying a trailer to haul my planes, so that will provide some of a size limit. Then there's the wife factor. How big can I build before she thinks I've lost my marbles? I'm leaning towards 96" as my largest wingspan.
Kerry
Any idea what is a popular "size" (wingspan)? I can't see myself buying a trailer to haul my planes, so that will provide some of a size limit. Then there's the wife factor. How big can I build before she thinks I've lost my marbles? I'm leaning towards 96" as my largest wingspan.
Kerry
#6
Picking a scale...
I must admit that I am very hard to please, so I have decided on exact 1:5 scale. Not 1:5.5 or 1:4.9..... EXACT 1:5...
Currently I´m in the process of making plans for a 1:5 scale set of retracts for an enlarged Taylor Typhoon. I will also have to design & build a reliable reduction gearing for my G-62. I hope to be able to swing a 33x18 3-blade scale prop with this setup.
I can´t stand to see a Typhoon being smaller than a BF 109...
Currently I´m in the process of making plans for a 1:5 scale set of retracts for an enlarged Taylor Typhoon. I will also have to design & build a reliable reduction gearing for my G-62. I hope to be able to swing a 33x18 3-blade scale prop with this setup.
I can´t stand to see a Typhoon being smaller than a BF 109...
#7
My Feedback: (2)
what scale
kerry, your wife may have already thought you "lost your marbles"lol i know mine has !! If you make your planes with removable wings like a right and left wing plus center section, you can get a pretty big plane into a smallish space..Ziroli's planes are a good size without being HUGE... IMO..so are Vallie aviation.. BobH.
Pellegris, Mick Reeves makes exactly what your looking for for you G-62. Its a gear reduction drive for the engine and looks very promising.. Regards BobH.
Pellegris, Mick Reeves makes exactly what your looking for for you G-62. Its a gear reduction drive for the engine and looks very promising.. Regards BobH.
#8
Picking a scale...
Hi BobH...
I´m aware of the reduction drive offered by Reeves... The only problem is that the ratio is not big enough. I´m looking for something like 2,5:1 reduction. I talked to a guy in germany who used a 2,5:1 drive to spin a 30x30 carbon prop at about 3500rpm. Made his 3m 20kg Sea Fury go straight up... That was with a G-62 also.
I might "steal" some of Reeves´s ideas when designing my own drive.
BTW. Does anyone think that it would be possible to make a conventional gearbox (like on an electric motor) instead of the belt drive? I´m guessing that a kickback from the engine when starting would make the gearbox explode...
I´m aware of the reduction drive offered by Reeves... The only problem is that the ratio is not big enough. I´m looking for something like 2,5:1 reduction. I talked to a guy in germany who used a 2,5:1 drive to spin a 30x30 carbon prop at about 3500rpm. Made his 3m 20kg Sea Fury go straight up... That was with a G-62 also.
I might "steal" some of Reeves´s ideas when designing my own drive.
BTW. Does anyone think that it would be possible to make a conventional gearbox (like on an electric motor) instead of the belt drive? I´m guessing that a kickback from the engine when starting would make the gearbox explode...
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Central City, IA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Picking a scale...
As for size, when someone askes my opinion I tell them to build the biggest that they can afford and accommidate. Although I bekieve bigger is better, I also understand that you will have a hard time transporting a 1/3 scale Corsair to the field in a 1963 VW Beetle