Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2010, 05:52 PM
  #576  
Evil_Merlin
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 3,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Almost but not quite...

Other aircraft had leading edge slats as well...
Old 03-05-2010, 08:07 PM
  #577  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz


ORIGINAL: Evil_Merlin

Almost but not quite...

Other aircraft had leading edge slats as well...
In addition to the leading edge slats, camber-changing flaps on the trailing edge? Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 03-05-2010, 10:55 PM
  #578  
Evil_Merlin
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 3,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Nope, focus on the leading edge slats...
Old 03-05-2010, 11:32 PM
  #579  
Ram-bro
My Feedback: (101)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bennington, NE
Posts: 5,816
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

forgot manuverabilty when it comes to the LE extensions and they were gravity driven.....
Old 03-06-2010, 12:18 AM
  #580  
Evil_Merlin
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 3,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

You guys are bouncing all around the answer. Yes, its about slats, but no one has gotten it exactly yet. Ram-bro is VERY close...
Old 03-06-2010, 12:29 AM
  #581  
Ram-bro
My Feedback: (101)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bennington, NE
Posts: 5,816
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

darn man..............
Old 03-06-2010, 12:33 AM
  #582  
Ram-bro
My Feedback: (101)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bennington, NE
Posts: 5,816
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

how about they were automatic and not manually actua?ted
Old 03-06-2010, 03:22 AM
  #583  
Brad330l
My Feedback: (1)
 
Brad330l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Perth WA, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

They were all activated by air pressure, or lack of it.

Brad
Old 03-06-2010, 07:18 AM
  #584  
jharkin
My Feedback: (2)
 
jharkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Holliston, MA
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Hmm. On the 109 they extended, retracted by air pressure... but on the 163 they were fixed slots.

On the 109 they were implemented to improve low speed maneuverability, by the time of the 163 they were just a standard Messershmit design feature. On the Lysander they were used to give it short field takeoff capability.

Im struggling to come up with some common reason/feature....
Old 03-06-2010, 08:41 AM
  #585  
Evil_Merlin
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 3,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

BING! We have a winner.

All the planes above had automatic LE slats. (the Me 163 originally flew with automatic slats).

All of them were used to improve low speed manuverability, regardless if Messerschmitt used them as a standard design or not. From Shuttleworth: "Consequently, as airspeed is reduced, or when more lift is required as the pilot pulls into a turn, the outer slats extend, followed, if necessary, by the inner slats and flaps."
Old 03-06-2010, 08:44 AM
  #586  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

I think Evil_Merlin is asking "why were they fitted; what did they aid or correct". On all of these planes, the leading edge slots were intended to improve the manueverability of the plane when turning at their higher speed. All of these planes had difficulty dealing with slower, fast turning planes in combat; their greater speed made them unable to turn with the slower planes, and caused them to simply overshoot the target. The leading edge slats were designed to help them turn faster, to follow a slower and fast turning target. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 03-06-2010, 09:40 AM
  #587  
deatonbt
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hermitage, TN
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Iam suspicious of the slats on Me-262 being used for high speed maneuver. I cannot recall the name of the video, but I saw a British after war documentary study on Youtube and they mentioned that the slats were used for landing. They did not mention that they were used for high speed turns. In the Me-262 wiki, it is mentioned that they are used for high speed turns. The wiki reference that is given is a general one for slats that can apply to any plane and is not Me-262 specific. The reference should not be used.
Old 03-06-2010, 11:07 AM
  #588  
masteromodels
My Feedback: (11)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: north port, FL
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

From what I remember a lot of the me-109 pilots claimed the slats through their aim off when in combat in the turns it would cause the plane to shutter.

thanks bob
Old 03-06-2010, 11:22 AM
  #589  
jharkin
My Feedback: (2)
 
jharkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Holliston, MA
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Yeah and I really though the Lysander's slats (along with the split flaps) were all about short field capability for its role in clandestine operations. I didn't think anybody intended it to do much combat maneuvering.....
Old 03-06-2010, 01:02 PM
  #590  
Top_Gunn
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Granger, IN
Posts: 2,344
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Slats give you more lift at the cost of more drag. If they retract at high speed, then theoretically you have the advantages of both a slatted wing (more lift at low speeds) and an unslatted wing (less drag at high speeds). If one of them gets stuck, so that only one deploys when you're coming in for a landing, you die, which is why the F-86's you see at airshows these days have the slats wired shut (except for the versions with the unslatted wing, of course).
Old 03-06-2010, 02:27 PM
  #591  
Ram-bro
My Feedback: (101)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bennington, NE
Posts: 5,816
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

I think I may have just snuck in the back door on getting one question right. Here is the 2 part question for the masses: What fighter plane was designed with inwing flotation devices and what happened that they did nt make it into production? Yes I know pretty easy but go for it
Old 03-06-2010, 03:09 PM
  #592  
nine o nine
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Gotta be the SeaDart. Mitch
Old 03-06-2010, 09:09 PM
  #593  
Evil_Merlin
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 3,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Wow, I don't even know where to start with that one. I would guess the B-29 or something along those lines... but you said fighter plane...
Old 03-06-2010, 09:43 PM
  #594  
proptop
My Feedback: (8)
 
proptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 7,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

I recall seeing a pic of an inflatable bag type of device...believe it was a pair of them (not sure if that's what you mean ) it might have been the F3F or FF-1?

2nd part might be inadvertant deployment?
Old 03-07-2010, 09:07 AM
  #595  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Interesting question; especially as several fighter aircraft were fitted with emergency flotation devices. The Sopwith 1-1/2 Strutter was fitted with in wing flotation devices as early as WWI; and the Dornier 17Z-5 (one of several fighter versions of the bomber aircraft produced) had in wing flotation devices fitted when used in its anti-shipping role. (I believe all of the Z variants were considered to be fighters by the Luftwaffe). And, of course, the Japanese Zero had flotation devices, but they were in the fuselage. But, all of these devices *were* fitted. Your question seems to indicate you're looking for an in-wing flotation device that *wasn't* fitted for some reason, correct? Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 03-07-2010, 10:26 AM
  #596  
Evil_Merlin
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 3,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

I know for a fact that Glen Curtiss actually had several patents for floatation devices for airplanes and it was in the 1920's...
Old 03-07-2010, 06:27 PM
  #597  
Ram-bro
My Feedback: (101)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bennington, NE
Posts: 5,816
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Proptop, good answer as far as I am concerned. F3f/F4f and it was an inadvertant opening as I recall during a high speed dive/ pull out. I guess I shoulda said US fighter plane. Proptop, th efloor is yours
Old 03-07-2010, 08:29 PM
  #598  
proptop
My Feedback: (8)
 
proptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 7,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Thanks...
I had F4F at first, then I 2nd guessed myself and edited my post to say F3F or FF-1 but I was pretty dang sure it was a Grumman "barrel"...

Gimmie a little while to think up something...they're getting a bit tougher to come up with.
Old 03-08-2010, 12:09 AM
  #599  
proptop
My Feedback: (8)
 
proptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 7,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

OK...it's late Sunday night and I'm really tired, but let's see if I can get something going here...don't wanna make youze guys wait too long.


B-47 crews used a certain form weapons delivery....however, it was used only for a relatively short period of time.
1) What was that delivery "system" ?
2) Why did they stop using it?
Old 03-08-2010, 12:10 AM
  #600  
Ram-bro
My Feedback: (101)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bennington, NE
Posts: 5,816
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

bomb tossing and overstressed the airframe


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.