Caracciolo class BB
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NewcastleNSW, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The first Caracciolo-class BB in the AusBG has undergone sea trials and an (accidental) baptism of fire.
She performed well, with only a bit of tweaking on the rudders required.
Now awaiting completion and certification of her cannon, and she'll be the Italian Bismarck she was intended to be.
</p>
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Altos,
CA
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
cool! The Caracciolo is an interesting class, faster than the QE's but in-line rudders not tandem. I wonder how well she compares. There is a very nice QE in the WWCC, HMS Warspite, that I used to love fighting against with my Viribus Unitis. The old-school WWI battleships have a look and style all on their own, that makes them truly special.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NewcastleNSW, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
With the Caracciolo, what you gain in speed, you lose in turning, big time.
That said, since I normally sail a Nelson-class, I thought the turning wasn't so bad.
With just a little tweak on the rudder arm, it will be quite acceptable, but still nowhere near as good as a QE
That said, since I normally sail a Nelson-class, I thought the turning wasn't so bad.
With just a little tweak on the rudder arm, it will be quite acceptable, but still nowhere near as good as a QE