RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   Scratch Building, Aircraft Design, 3D/CAD (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/scratch-building-aircraft-design-3d-cad-174/)
-   -   CAD at Home (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/scratch-building-aircraft-design-3d-cad-174/1167937-cad-home.html)

CoosBayLumber 09-28-2003 07:27 PM

CAD at Home
 
CAD at Home

I need some information from CAD users to complete a report. If you are familiar with CAD, what software are you using at home?

If your are only using it at the office, down the street, or at school, then don't respond. Need to know what is loaded up on the computer to which you may be accessing the internet with.

Then,

Is the CAD software that you are using considered obsolete, or is it the current version?

Did you buy it retail, at a close-out or discount place, get it second-hand after it was pulled off another computer, or are you operating from a Demo or Free-Trial version?

How familiar or capable do you feel with it? 100% familiar with all the functions, maybe 60% knowledgible, just barely familiar, or just have it installed and not really sure how it works?


Thank you for your responces.


Wm.

glidaguy28 09-28-2003 08:11 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
hi there Coosbay have a free program from Fastcad called viewer7....lets me scale and print DXF planes......only new to this and learning...the more I use the better I get....I all so have Turbocad V5 but find this to overwellming with to many options and doesnt display all my Cad files.....have had no such problems with Fastcad....Crewe

clscale-RCU 09-28-2003 08:25 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
I just bought Design CAd 3-D max since it can import in Bitmaps. I am scanning in the 3-views as bitmaps and then in Design Cad 3-D max converting these into vector lines.

The cad program cost $70 from www.outpost.com

I also have Pro-E student edition on my home computer but it can not import in bitmaps. I have used Pro-E at work and at home and honestly it is not well suited for model airplane plans if you are dealing with scale planes and want to import in bitmaps to get the right shape. If you are designing your own new design it can work wonders, design in 3-D and then create the drawings from the 3-D models.

Pro-E is difficult to learn and is 3-D based, not drawing based.

I have noticed that most users avoid the 3-D modeling and go straight to the 2-D drafting.

BMatthews 09-28-2003 08:54 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
TurboCAD 7 here. I feel that I'm about 70% familiar with it to the point I can do the CAD faster than I can do the same drawing if I have to so much as pick up a ruler to use with a pencil. Current version is 9 so I guess I'm obsolete but it does what I need so I don't feel much pressure to upgrade. Bought it as an upgrade from ver 5.1 off the net. Bought the original 5.1 at a discount price from the local software store.

William Robison 09-28-2003 10:19 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
AutoCAD LT. Bought new. Still learning, and I don't feel qualified to rate it.

Went for the (relatively) big bucks because of the reputation.

Bill.

toy264 09-28-2003 11:21 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
Have loaded on computer:
AutoCAD 2002, fairly current, - bought retail- 2D 60%, 3D just starting
Winfoil, current version, retail, 100%
Compufoil, demo version, 50%-don't use
Profili, demo, 50%- don't use
Rhino 3D demo, 0%, haven't tried

shupack 09-29-2003 01:34 AM

RE: CAD at Home
 
I'm using a cheapo 15 dollar program called totalcad 2d-3d, it was cheap so I bought it, i'm about 50% proficient with 2d, no idea how to make the 3d work yet. I used autocad for one semester in school 10 years ago, and the schools version was obsolete then, but that was a better program than what I have now,

when I import a pic, BMP, JPG, TIF...doesn't matter, it ends up squashed into a 1cm square, re-sizing it leaves me with a bunch of fuzz, no lines. I've tried for weeks to get it to work, no joy. and the layers arent' really layers, they just make changing colors a little faster, but for just plain drawing it does it's job well

steveg_oz 09-29-2003 01:53 AM

RE: CAD at Home
 
Hi,

I'm using QuickCAD (by Autodesk, very cut down version of Autocad). Bought the software full price. Haven't updated it since purchase in 1999. About 80%+ familiar with the product.

I'm thinking about updating as I'm trying to get into CADCAM kit production, its been suggested that I switch to AutoSketch.

Steve

Edwin 09-29-2003 08:18 AM

RE: CAD at Home
 
TurboCad6, got it free from work after an upgrade. Also Drawing Board. I'm about 80% familiar with either. I bought Drawing Bd before I got TC6 for $100. I also use Compufoil, full package.
Edwin

dr_wogz 09-29-2003 08:32 AM

RE: CAD at Home
 
Borrowed copy from work
Acad, Mech desktop & Inventor.
Since my day consists of 90% Acad, very knowlageble...
Furniture, doll houses, feild boxes, actual work form work...

narpets 09-29-2003 08:45 AM

RE: CAD at Home
 
Drawingboard. Bough it as intro offer years ago for something like $50. About 90%
CompuFoil. Bought full version years ago. About 60% total features, and 100% of what I need it for :D

Pilatus 09-30-2003 04:06 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
Hi,
with all known cad programs represented in the replies above, which <200USD program can do the following;

I would like to play around with my 3D model and stretch the fuselage etc and at the same time get the fuselage formers or ribs in paperspace to change as I change things in modelview. Some of the CheapCAD alternatives can just view different angles of the 3D model in the paperspace views and not display a specific block or cross section. In other words, as I change the 3D model I would like to see all the individual parts to change directly in the plan that I intend to print.

//calle

DanSavage 09-30-2003 05:54 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 

ORIGINAL: CoosBayLumber
CAD at Home
DesignCAD 3D MAX - Current version, bought retail, 85% familiar with functions.
DesignCAD 3D - Original DOS version, bought retail, 95% familiar with functions.

Dan

ProfLooney 09-30-2003 06:47 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
WM I use corel draw 11 which is current version. I have mechanical desktop 6 but it is so complicated I hardly ever use it. Corel I got as an upgrade and mech desktop got from my boy cause he uses it at school and needs to use my puter sometime so I would assume it is student version.

Joe

CoosBayLumber 09-30-2003 08:01 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
Sort of restricting this to CAD, as graphic arts software is not of interest as mentioned in opening, and does not work into present need for information. Such software will not also accept simple LISP programs which eliminate much of the tediousness.


Wm.

lharvey 10-06-2003 05:08 AM

RE: CAD at Home
 
I have been in engineering and working with CAD systems for over 15 years. By far, the best software for me is MicroStation. I have used this software on the professional level to do everything from create models, movies as well as design drawings.

If you can imagine it, you can draw it using MicroStatioin. When a company purchases a licensed copy, they are also awarded a "Home Use Copy" for allowing the users to take a copy home for non-commercial use. Thus, this is my design software of choice at home.

Mike James 10-06-2003 07:10 AM

RE: CAD at Home
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hi Bill,

I'm still using "Carrara Studio" (V.3), which is the evolution of some software originally called "Ray Dream Designer", then later "Ray Dream Studio". ( http://www/eovia.com )

I don't generally print plans from Carrara, but instead, use it to quickly visualize design shapes and equipment installation. (and to show guys on RCU my latest designs) I can import and export dxf, 3ds, obj, and it's proprietary file format, ".car". The modeler will allow importing of EPS files, so I can do cross-sections in Illustrator, then use them in Carrara, if I want to.

I bought it new, and purchase upgrades as they are offered. I am 100% familiar with it, since I've been using it for about 10 years.

canadagoose 10-06-2003 07:35 AM

RE: CAD at Home
 
TurboCad 7 for me, bought it off EBAY. I feel i'm about 50% familiar with the functions, still have alot to learn.

Jim_Purcha 10-07-2003 11:31 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
Check out Intellicad at www.cadopia.com. You can download the evaluation version for free. It's a good as Autocad 2000 for 2d cad work. Autocad dwg file compatible, export dxf and other formats.

oldcabmkr 10-08-2003 08:17 AM

RE: CAD at Home
 
I use AutoCad 14, but also have 2000 and 2002. I have been using AutoCad for about 10 years and love it. I also use Compufoil for all the wing layout and rib generation (full version). I can export to a dxf and paste the parts and lofted wing layout directly into AutoCad. This is great and saves having to draw the wing. I also have a plotter at home and work and this is great for making my own plans (36" format at home and 42" at work).
Thanks Doug

Ch0pp3r 10-08-2003 12:45 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
Model Cad 3000 at home. I bought it for $55 at a discount on the internet. I had a previous version and felt comfortable with the previous software package so I opted to continue with the line. I feel I am 60% to 70% proficient. The new version has improved documentation so I am learning faster.

mking1 10-08-2003 02:08 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
Design cad 3d max at home. It's not obsolete, but the current version is on order.
Origininally purchased from local computer/software store. Latest version purchased on-line.
Miles.

windtalker 10-08-2003 06:16 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
AutoCad 2000 utilizing the 2D and 3D features.
Automated Machinery, jigs, fixtures etcc......
I guess about 85-90% proficient.
Use same copy at home and work.

CoosBayLumber 10-27-2003 10:56 AM

RE: CAD at Home
 
OK, thanks all. Your replies and information will be used soon.

If any newcomers to this site are using CAD at home for Model A/C purposes, please sign in, and indicate as per above, what you are using.



Wm.

DICKEYBIRD 10-27-2003 03:29 PM

RE: CAD at Home
 
Sorry William, missed the post earlier. I use TurboCAD v3.01 at home, with my laptop on business trips (great fun on airline flights to pass the time) and somewhat on my office 'puter. It was current in about '94/'95 and I began to use it initially because it was a fairly small program, RAM miserly and had a clean, simple interface plus good helpfiles. I have older computers and older software seems to work the best with them. I traded an old FS program for it and yes, I guess most people would say it's obsolete.

I would consider myself about 75% proficient with it and am still learning.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.