trx 2.5
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Butler,
PA
I believe, and I may be wrong, it is 2.5 cubic centimeters or .15 cubic inches. I think they just use the 2.5 for marketing reasons, its not the standard measurement used but it makes it sound bigger.
#4
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: , FL
ORIGINAL: tommythecat
I believe, and I may be wrong, it is 2.5 cubic centimeters or .15 cubic inches. I think they just use the 2.5 for marketing reasons, its not the standard measurement used but it makes it sound bigger.
I believe, and I may be wrong, it is 2.5 cubic centimeters or .15 cubic inches. I think they just use the 2.5 for marketing reasons, its not the standard measurement used but it makes it sound bigger.
they do thats how they get newbies to think wow im getting more when they are actually not
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Butler,
PA
huh?
.15 cubic inches = 2.5 cubic centimeters, so the displacement is just being stated in metric rather than standard units
I think your thinking about the difference between the traxxas pro .15 and the traxxas trx 2.5 or 2.5r. They are different in design not in displacement.
.15 cubic inches = 2.5 cubic centimeters, so the displacement is just being stated in metric rather than standard units
I think your thinking about the difference between the traxxas pro .15 and the traxxas trx 2.5 or 2.5r. They are different in design not in displacement.
#10
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: hamilton, ON, CANADA
im not a newb but my freind is and hes like no its a .25 then i laughed for like 30min then showed him my brother .25 side by side with my .15 and hes like man their a .25 im not lieing. then i just stoped argueing.



