Extending run times
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bristol, UNITED KINGDOM
I know driving techniques and water cooling etc affect run times, but are there any other ways of extending run times.
Im thinking particularly of the case with my twin prop Sintra 700, which is run by two battery packs. Im sure I read somewhere that theres something that can be done with twin packs to extend the run times
Any ideas anyone
Otherwise Im looking for some boat upgrades - what recommendations are there for reasonably decent performance boats with decent run times off the batteries
Im thinking particularly of the case with my twin prop Sintra 700, which is run by two battery packs. Im sure I read somewhere that theres something that can be done with twin packs to extend the run times
Any ideas anyone
Otherwise Im looking for some boat upgrades - what recommendations are there for reasonably decent performance boats with decent run times off the batteries
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale,
FL
Im sure I read somewhere that theres something that can be done with twin packs to extend the run times
#7
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bristol, UNITED KINGDOM
So I would need to upgrade the 2 motors and the ESC to use higher capacity batteries then ?
Running a 3000 battery caused a similar 540 motor to get very hot in one of my other boats [&o]
Running a 3000 battery caused a similar 540 motor to get very hot in one of my other boats [&o]
#8
ORIGINAL: timmosav
So I would need to upgrade the 2 motors and the ESC to use higher capacity batteries then ?
Running a 3000 battery caused a similar 540 motor to get very hot in one of my other boats [&o]
So I would need to upgrade the 2 motors and the ESC to use higher capacity batteries then ?
Running a 3000 battery caused a similar 540 motor to get very hot in one of my other boats [&o]
And to answer your other question, NO you won't have to ugrade your ESC as mah has nothing to do with voltage delivered. Mah is simply a measure of how long the cells will last in milli amp hours. Like fuel in a tank, 3000 mah battery packs last twice as long as 1500 mah battery packs (assuming the same quality and peak charging).
Lastly, if you don't already have one, you should use a peak charger (like a dynamite peak charger) to get the most out of your batteries. Make sure you are fully discharging your current batteries (ni-cd's) prior to re-charging so they don't get the "memory effect". If you move to ni-mh cells this is a non issue. Good luck.
#9
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bristol, UNITED KINGDOM
thanks for that rooski.
I have a decent charger which charges both types of battery - thanks to the forum I discovered that only the nicads need fully discharging.
I thought I had read somewhere about the ESC controller which prompted the question - perhaps I misread, is it possible that certain ESC's will perform best with certain motors or are they pretty universal
I have a decent charger which charges both types of battery - thanks to the forum I discovered that only the nicads need fully discharging.
I thought I had read somewhere about the ESC controller which prompted the question - perhaps I misread, is it possible that certain ESC's will perform best with certain motors or are they pretty universal
#10
Certain low turn motors (which you don't have) do draw a lot of amps and in the wrong set-up can catch fire...seriously. But your 540 motor is a 23+ turn unit so this is not an issue. Your motor is built for 7.2v / 6 cell packs so as long as you stay with the correct voltage your motor and speed control will be fine. However, if you double up your volts by running 2 7.2 packs in series, this gives you 14.4v. If your ESC and motors are not rated for that many volts then they will burn.
We don't have Sintra 700 boats over here in the U.S. I don't think but a UK website I looked at gave me some basic info on the boat (below). Unless you have changed out your original speed control, you have a "switch" in that boat and NOT an ESC. This is another reason you get short runtimes...because your boat is either at full throttle or off. For a better rc boating experience there are many great ways to upgrade your boat. If you don't want super speed, you could simply add a Pro Boat waterproof ESC for $39 USD and get true electronic proportional speed control.
Sintra 700 Specifications and features:
* Ready to run electric R/C High Speed Off Shore racer with radio.
* Sintra 700 R/C Boat - 'Ready To Run' Single Motor Version.
* Waterproof receiver box
* Well designed V-Hull keeps the boat smooth and stable even at high speed.
* Reliable for racing! Fully adjustable trim tabs and anti skid fins
* Micro switch on/off speed controller[:'(]
* High torque Maubuchi RS54OSH motor is included.
We don't have Sintra 700 boats over here in the U.S. I don't think but a UK website I looked at gave me some basic info on the boat (below). Unless you have changed out your original speed control, you have a "switch" in that boat and NOT an ESC. This is another reason you get short runtimes...because your boat is either at full throttle or off. For a better rc boating experience there are many great ways to upgrade your boat. If you don't want super speed, you could simply add a Pro Boat waterproof ESC for $39 USD and get true electronic proportional speed control.
Sintra 700 Specifications and features:
* Ready to run electric R/C High Speed Off Shore racer with radio.
* Sintra 700 R/C Boat - 'Ready To Run' Single Motor Version.
* Waterproof receiver box
* Well designed V-Hull keeps the boat smooth and stable even at high speed.
* Reliable for racing! Fully adjustable trim tabs and anti skid fins
* Micro switch on/off speed controller[:'(]
* High torque Maubuchi RS54OSH motor is included.
#11
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bristol, UNITED KINGDOM
Thanks for the interesting info.
My Sintra is the twin motor, twin prop version powered by two battery packs. I must confess I hadnt looked that closely at the innards as I bought this as a ready to run.
My other boat an Interceptor runs a 15v ESC controller, ok there isnt room for two battery packs, but in theory then I could connect two 7.2v batteries up with this controller.
If the Sintra does not have the ESC controller (Ive got a gut feeling that the dealer said there was in this model), would it be best to get a 15v ESC, or would it be better to get a higher rated one - if so which should I go for, what are the implications for having a higher rated ESC controller than is necessary, again does it affect run times.
There is a reasoning behind this, in that I borrowed a Futaba battery checker yesterday to check my collection of NiCad and Nimh batteries. Most showed charging levels pretty much in line with what I expected, dependent on when last used / charged and all came in between 90% and 100% charged up.
What was more strange but Im told is not unusual, is that the battery voltages ranged from 7.1v on one of the Nicads, up to as high as 8.7v on 2 of the 3000 mAh Nimh batteries I have.
On this basis therefore if the 2 batteries which read 8.7v were installed together that gives 17.4v combined - presumably this would have implications for the ESC controller rated at 15v, or is that level of tolerance acceptable.
Thanks again
Andrew
My Sintra is the twin motor, twin prop version powered by two battery packs. I must confess I hadnt looked that closely at the innards as I bought this as a ready to run.
My other boat an Interceptor runs a 15v ESC controller, ok there isnt room for two battery packs, but in theory then I could connect two 7.2v batteries up with this controller.
If the Sintra does not have the ESC controller (Ive got a gut feeling that the dealer said there was in this model), would it be best to get a 15v ESC, or would it be better to get a higher rated one - if so which should I go for, what are the implications for having a higher rated ESC controller than is necessary, again does it affect run times.
There is a reasoning behind this, in that I borrowed a Futaba battery checker yesterday to check my collection of NiCad and Nimh batteries. Most showed charging levels pretty much in line with what I expected, dependent on when last used / charged and all came in between 90% and 100% charged up.
What was more strange but Im told is not unusual, is that the battery voltages ranged from 7.1v on one of the Nicads, up to as high as 8.7v on 2 of the 3000 mAh Nimh batteries I have.
On this basis therefore if the 2 batteries which read 8.7v were installed together that gives 17.4v combined - presumably this would have implications for the ESC controller rated at 15v, or is that level of tolerance acceptable.
Thanks again
Andrew
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sneek, NETHERLANDS
The simplest way to extend runtime is to move up in mAh batterywise.
As others have mentioned, this requires cooling on the motors, because they will heat up substantually more, damaging the magnets in the longrun.
Better is to upgrade to a more efficient motor, the 540 motors are only 65-70% efficient (at best), the rest of your battery power is converted into heat.
Make sure the entire drive train runs as smooth as possible, steering outdrives are nototious powersuckers, a straight shaft or a flex shaft is much more efficient, keeping everything lubed is another thing, stuffing the stuffing tube with stiff grease is not a good idea, as it causes tremendous friction.
Choosing the right motor for the job is a variation on the theme above, a 800 motor in your Sintra would be very powerfull, but the boat would almost sink due to the weight of the 20 cells this motor requires.
Being content with less topspeed can extend your runtime considerably, my 12 cell monohull runs eight minutes with a 700 Neodym motor and reaches 45 Km/h
A test with a 700 ferrite motor gave me about twenty minutes of runtime with the hull getting just on the plane, not exitingly fast for a fast electric, but definately an alternative in a MTB that struggles with two 540 motors which get hot, even watercooled.
All components are related to each other and changing one will affect the others.
Regards, Jan.
As others have mentioned, this requires cooling on the motors, because they will heat up substantually more, damaging the magnets in the longrun.
Better is to upgrade to a more efficient motor, the 540 motors are only 65-70% efficient (at best), the rest of your battery power is converted into heat.
Make sure the entire drive train runs as smooth as possible, steering outdrives are nototious powersuckers, a straight shaft or a flex shaft is much more efficient, keeping everything lubed is another thing, stuffing the stuffing tube with stiff grease is not a good idea, as it causes tremendous friction.
Choosing the right motor for the job is a variation on the theme above, a 800 motor in your Sintra would be very powerfull, but the boat would almost sink due to the weight of the 20 cells this motor requires.
Being content with less topspeed can extend your runtime considerably, my 12 cell monohull runs eight minutes with a 700 Neodym motor and reaches 45 Km/h
A test with a 700 ferrite motor gave me about twenty minutes of runtime with the hull getting just on the plane, not exitingly fast for a fast electric, but definately an alternative in a MTB that struggles with two 540 motors which get hot, even watercooled.
All components are related to each other and changing one will affect the others.
Regards, Jan.





