Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Tips & Techniques
Easy CG method for large planes. >

Easy CG method for large planes.

Community
Search
Notices
Tips & Techniques Want to share a tip or special technique you have either in the workshop or at the flying field or race track? Post it right here!

Easy CG method for large planes.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2015 | 12:26 PM
  #1  
radfordc's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,598
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lansing, KS
Default Easy CG method for large planes.

After seeing the new Xicoy CG machine ( http://www.ultimate-jets.net/product...tal-cg-machine ) I decided that I could do about as well using the method that is used to do Weight and Balance on full size planes and at a much lower cost.

I purchased three digital scales from Walmart's web site. The small one is for up to 11 lbs, and the big ones go to 18 lbs. These should suit weighing a 40 lb airplane. The total cost was less than $50.

Start by leveling the plane and lining it up with a reference mark and then make three measurements: distance to main gear, distance to tailwheel (or nose wheel), and distance to wing LE. I used the edge of my work table as the reference and dropped a plumb bob down from the tip of the prop spinner. I measured: Main gear = 18.75; Tail wheel = 58.4; LE = 16.75

With the plane still level, zero the scales and put them under the wheels and measure the weights. I got: TW = 36.9 oz; R Main = 145; L Main = 146.9 Total weight of plane = 328,8 oz (20.5 lb)

For the CG here is the math:
1. Calculate tail moment: tail distance x tail weigh or 58.4 x 36.9 = 2155
2. Calculate main gear moment: main distance x sum of L and R main gear weight or 18.75 x 291.9 = 5473
3. CG distance from reference point is total moment divided by total weight: 5473 + 2155 = 7628 CG = 7628 / 328.8 = 23.2
4. CG distance back from LE: 23.2 - 16.75 = 6.45"

The manual calls for the CG to be 6.375" back....I figured this was close enough and sure enough the plane flys great.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0983.JPG
Views:	193
Size:	91.4 KB
ID:	2111659   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0984.JPG
Views:	183
Size:	76.7 KB
ID:	2111660   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0985.JPG
Views:	186
Size:	92.9 KB
ID:	2111661   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0989.JPG
Views:	200
Size:	106.5 KB
ID:	2111662   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0986.JPG
Views:	179
Size:	64.6 KB
ID:	2111663   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0987.JPG
Views:	179
Size:	72.9 KB
ID:	2111664   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0988.JPG
Views:	167
Size:	93.1 KB
ID:	2111665  
Old 07-29-2015 | 04:31 PM
  #2  
acerc's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,131
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: The Sunshine state, when it's not raining!
Default

That is how I do it only I have a spreadsheet that does the math for me.
Old 07-30-2015 | 06:17 PM
  #3  
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Leawood, KS,
Default

This might be a dumb question, but on setting the CG on say a P-40 or Corsair where there is a significant shift in weight as the gear rotates and retracts rearward, my question is how do you account for that shift in weight with this method? Most people calculate the CG with the gear retracted. So how would you balance an aircraft like that?

Thanks,

James
Old 07-31-2015 | 07:15 AM
  #4  
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: WILLIAMSTON, SC
Default

Originally Posted by Wizard61
This might be a dumb question, but on setting the CG on say a P-40 or Corsair where there is a significant shift in weight as the gear rotates and retracts rearward, my question is how do you account for that shift in weight with this method? Most people calculate the CG with the gear retracted. So how would you balance an aircraft like that?

Thanks,

James

That's a good ? Not a dumb one
Old 08-01-2015 | 08:44 AM
  #5  
radfordc's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,598
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lansing, KS
Default

Balancing a P-40 with the gear up would require making support stands to set on the scales. You can zero out the weight of the supports before setting the plane on them. You would still need to have the plane level and you would use the distance from the support stands to the reference point for your calculations.
Old 08-01-2015 | 11:29 AM
  #6  
radfordc's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,598
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lansing, KS
Default

Here is how to do a Skyshark P-40. Make the supports that go under the wings and tail. Decide where the supports will fit and make the measurements back from the tip of the spinner. In this case: Main supports = 21.1"; Tail support = 53.1"; LE = 19.7".

Place the supports on the scales and zero the scales. Place the plane on the supports where you made the measurements. Record the weights and do the math.

Main moment = 21.1" x 325 oz = 6857.5 Tail moment = 53.1" x 33.7oz = 1789.5 Total moment = 8647

CG = 8647 / 358.7oz = 24.1" back from tip or 4.4" back from LE of wing.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0993.JPG
Views:	164
Size:	106.9 KB
ID:	2112261   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0994.JPG
Views:	163
Size:	87.7 KB
ID:	2112262   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0995.JPG
Views:	179
Size:	113.0 KB
ID:	2112263  
Old 08-01-2015 | 01:00 PM
  #7  
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,344
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Granger, IN
Default

With a Vanessa rig you can find the balance point of any plane, big or small, upright or inverted, with gear up or down. And you can make one out of stuff you probably already have. And when you're done, you can raise it up to the ceiling, so it doesn't need storage space. I do sometimes bump my head against it though (low ceiling in the basement).
Old 08-01-2015 | 03:09 PM
  #8  
radfordc's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,598
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lansing, KS
Default

I agree with the Vanessa rig....I've used mine many times. The Xicoy CG system is the new electronic method of doing a weight and balance, but it costs $300. I did this at less than $50.

Also, the Vanessa rig is subject to some potential problems. I would hate for the rope to break with a 20 lb plane hanging in the air. And, the Vanessa doesn't provide the weight of the plane....you still have to have a scale.
Old 08-01-2015 | 07:29 PM
  #9  
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Leawood, KS,
Default

OK Radfordc. That makes sense to me now. Thanks for posting the method.

James

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.