Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Tips & Techniques
alternative coverings to traditional methods >

alternative coverings to traditional methods

Community
Search
Notices
Tips & Techniques Want to share a tip or special technique you have either in the workshop or at the flying field or race track? Post it right here!

alternative coverings to traditional methods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2003 | 06:26 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bedford, PA
Default alternative coverings to traditional methods

Hi,

I'm looking for ideas for an inexpensive and very fast way to cover my airplanes. I'm building a few experimental, but conventional layouts to play with. I'm not looking for pretty, just functional and no heavier than a plastic, iron-on covering. I will be test flying my designs, cutting them up a little, and trying them again. Just experimenting for my own studies.

How about the crazy idea of folding over some plastic wrap a few times, and then bonding to airframe with spray adhesive? I don't know...just a thought.

Any ideas will be great.

Thanks,

Dan
Old 02-01-2003 | 09:44 PM
  #2  
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: KS
Default alternative coverings to traditional methods

Or...try a different building method completely, that doesn't require any covering at all, already fuel proof, planes for less than 10 bucks, no ribs... from scratch to flight ready in several hours...a designer/experimenter's dream...creating planes that last longer, are tougher, and often fly better than conventional methods.
Check it out
Old 02-02-2003 | 07:31 PM
  #3  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Gahanna, OH
Default alternative coverings to traditional methods

The cheapast covering is Towerkote. The problem with it is that it delaminates. However, if your only playing with a limited life airplane it mayb e what you want.

RCPAUL
Old 07-01-2003 | 12:59 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Londonderry, NH
Default alternative coverings to traditional methods

WOW spads no kidding I had no idea looks like fun and cheap.
Old 07-01-2003 | 09:48 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Riverside, RI
Default alternative coverings to traditional methods

I heard from an old timer (he's gone now), that when he was stationed with the Flying Tigers he used whatever he could get he hands on. Beleive it or not, "yes" they flew model airplanes, but I suspect they may have been rubber powered. Anyway, he said the guys used to pull a womens nylon stocking over the balsa framework!
Old 07-02-2003 | 06:42 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Londonderry, NH
Default alternative coverings to traditional methods

Ya That is a common method for the rocket guys. They use a fiberglass sock with one end tied they pull it over and tie the other end then glass resen the rocket.
Old 07-02-2003 | 01:51 PM
  #7  
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ocean, NJ
Default alternative coverings to traditional methods

The July issue of RCModeler has a small electric covered with Reynolds Food Wrap. Gives you some good info on the covering. If you are not building to large, might be worth a try.
Old 07-04-2003 | 04:00 PM
  #8  
ballgunner 's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Payson, AZ
Default alternative coverings to traditional methods

There have been some modelers who used a women's coat lining material that was, or maybe still is, available from fabric stores. It was a very light material that covered much like silk or Coverite and was fairly inexpensive in comparison to regular model covering. You might take a look at it and see if it will fill the bill for you. I haven't heard it mentioned for some time so it may no longer be available. If I remember right it had to be applied over a doped surface and then doped down. It was supposed to shrink just like other fabric covering and then had to be filled with primer before painting. The main reason for use was the lower cost.
Old 07-05-2003 | 03:03 PM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: AZ
Default alternative coverings to traditional methods

I think Ballgunner is talking about Chiffon. It is 100% polyester. I does shrink. I use it for all open bay covering.
Instead of DOPE I desolve styofoam in lacquer thinner then iron it on at high heat.

Walt

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.