dumas air boat help
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: tomsriver,
NJ
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dumas air boat help
built a big swamp ...elect power...3 blade 10x6....650 watt output 1100 kv with 3 cell battery..........heres the problem....twin air rudder left and rights both the same throw...wont turn left.......turns right just fine.............motor is set up stright on..nose of motor is piched up a bit...boat sits level in water............HELP
#4
Have your thrust line parallel to the waters surface on plane. It will take some experimenting to get this part just right. Generally, I set my engines to have he prop shaft parallel to the keel of the boat which generally is parallel to the water when underway.
#6
I only use 2-blade props. Cheaper, more choices, and more efficient.
Dont use wood props on airboats in case you have already. It ends real badly when the prop hits water at rpm and blows apart. Stick to APC, or at the least, Master Airscrew props. The former is the best IMO.
Dont use wood props on airboats in case you have already. It ends real badly when the prop hits water at rpm and blows apart. Stick to APC, or at the least, Master Airscrew props. The former is the best IMO.
#7
Exactly what motor are you using? The “watt output” means little. Regardless, that prop is-probably not the best for the motor unless it is a pretty large one. Too, exactly what ESC and cells are you running?
The reason for poor left turning is usually due to prop torque. As above, larger rudders will help. So will a smaller prop, but we need the above info to make an intelligent recommendation.
.
The reason for poor left turning is usually due to prop torque. As above, larger rudders will help. So will a smaller prop, but we need the above info to make an intelligent recommendation.
.
Last edited by Got RPM; 09-23-2017 at 03:16 PM.
#8
I have several airboats that turn right as well as they turn left. Prop torque is a thing, but not as influential as it's made to be in a lot of cases. Make the rudders bigger (deeper) and that should fix it up pretty good.
#10
Adding some throw to the rudder will help turning as well, but the best performance comes from bigger rudders and equal throws right and left - 45 degrees from centered is really good.
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Placement of your rudders are very important. Two blade props are the ideal prop and I run a 10/6 with my 3674 1900kv motor using 11.2 volts and 3000Mah. I also use dual rudders BUT, you don't have to,but, it's preferred. The rudders must have as much prop wash as possible to be effective. I've seen too many people build air boats and I have to wonder how that prop wash makes it back there to the rudders. The mounts have to be as thin and strong as possible. Maybe some need to start using 'pushers' instead if the mounts are going to interfere with prop wash. My set-up is all aluminum and my dual rudders are 1/16" thick, I believe. And using a 3 or four blade would probably heat things up if the motor wasn't big enough and the ESC was inadequate for it. Make sure the prop has good line of sight to that or those rudders! Even with the worst case scenario any air boat will steer really really good to the left or right with proper placement and prop wash. One rudder will work just about as good as two rudders if placed right with enough prop wash. BTW, mine is a home made 33" and every function couldn't get any better. We need to know the motor, ESC and batteries you are using and photos do wonders for getting the proper help.
#12
Thanks for the tip and the pics, mine is a dumas big swamp buggy, I dont have pics yet just a short vid I can post. I just read about the flat bottom mod and want to check into doing that along with making larger rudders.
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeh, that's cool. I have three so-called runners under my boat. One on each side and one down the middle and they are none other than the roll of car/automotive sticky trim you can buy at any automotive store. It works wonders and of course is water proof. It also protects the bottom skin of the boat pretty well. They help keep the boat straight and yet allow it to slide in the turns. I'm happy with the idea. I plan on building a 72" as well pretty soon and I am doing a lot of research first. I don't need any hiccups while building it. I may go with 3/16" plywood from Home Depot but I will make sure I have all my bases covered first. Then I may use the sticky trim again if I don't build some tiny aluminum ribs under the hull. Thanks.
#14
My Feedback: (5)
I still have my Dumas BSB from '76 with the original ST60 glow engine. Painted it with K&B epoxy paint (do they still make that ?). Looks as good today as it did when I built it.
Mine always turned better to the right and I just lived with it. I always used wooden props and the only time they wore out was when I was following my buddy around ingesting the water spray from his boat. Trimmed the prop down nicely !
Mine always turned better to the right and I just lived with it. I always used wooden props and the only time they wore out was when I was following my buddy around ingesting the water spray from his boat. Trimmed the prop down nicely !
#15
I threw my BSB in the trash. A friend built it from the kit using the wood provided. The kit wood is heavy and often warped (much of it was mahogany which is a heavy but hard and dense wood. The design of the BSB aid basically a tunnel
hull which is often regarded as a high speed straight line design and doesn’t lend well to being an airboat without converting the bottom to a flat bottom. Mine was converted to a flat bottom with a sheet of Lexan across the bottom. Due to my
boat hull alone weighing close to 10 pounds, I decided it wasn’t worth refurbing and making water worthy. If I were to do another BSB, I’d use spruce or basswood and plywood instead of the kit wood and either use an outboard on the tunnel hull and do it wet prop style or make it a true flat bottom and use an air prop.
And I would strongly discourage using wood props on airboats going over water. Bad juju.
hull which is often regarded as a high speed straight line design and doesn’t lend well to being an airboat without converting the bottom to a flat bottom. Mine was converted to a flat bottom with a sheet of Lexan across the bottom. Due to my
boat hull alone weighing close to 10 pounds, I decided it wasn’t worth refurbing and making water worthy. If I were to do another BSB, I’d use spruce or basswood and plywood instead of the kit wood and either use an outboard on the tunnel hull and do it wet prop style or make it a true flat bottom and use an air prop.
And I would strongly discourage using wood props on airboats going over water. Bad juju.
#16
I eventually tossed mine after many years of use, although apparently I had more luck than many. I had modified the boat by sheeting over that big deck opening and building a pod for the engine, placing the tank directly behind the engine. Zero of the fuel delivery issues which plagued many. I also increased the rudder sizes and set them as low as possible. The Fox .45 and a 10x7 Master Airscrew prop (no APC back then) gave speeds in the upper 30s and as long as it was on step handling was decent. Off plane, not so much.
Actually, tunnel boats are noted for their excellent turning, anyone who has watched F1 tunnels race knows they can literally turn on a dime. I oval raced R/C catamarans for 30 years and know that turning is their strongpoint, but being air compression hulls maintaining high straightline speed is a challenge. I should know, I’ve held a lot of SAW records with cats.
The biggest issues with the BSB were its high weight, poor motor thrust angle, sketchy fuel delivery and too-forward CG. The biggest improvements would be losing a pound and moving the CG back to 22-25%. Covering the tunnel making it a flatly would help turning, but top speed would be dramatically reduced. The biggest contributing factor to low speeds with airboats is excess drag/large wetted area.
Bottom line - there are better hulls but if you like the boat that’s what matters.
.
Actually, tunnel boats are noted for their excellent turning, anyone who has watched F1 tunnels race knows they can literally turn on a dime. I oval raced R/C catamarans for 30 years and know that turning is their strongpoint, but being air compression hulls maintaining high straightline speed is a challenge. I should know, I’ve held a lot of SAW records with cats.
The biggest issues with the BSB were its high weight, poor motor thrust angle, sketchy fuel delivery and too-forward CG. The biggest improvements would be losing a pound and moving the CG back to 22-25%. Covering the tunnel making it a flatly would help turning, but top speed would be dramatically reduced. The biggest contributing factor to low speeds with airboats is excess drag/large wetted area.
Bottom line - there are better hulls but if you like the boat that’s what matters.
.
#17
I should have clarified - a tunnel hull doesn’t turn as well as a flat bottom boat will when you consider the airboat will want to slide in a turn. Many of the BSBs I’ve seen run had a tendency to flip over in a turn because the sponson (maybe not the right term?) on the outside of the turn would bite and dig in and cause a flip. A flat bottom typically will not exhibit this behavior provided the setup is good.
#18
Thanks for the info guys, I think for now I will just add 2 trim tabs to the back, sounds like filling the tunnel will add weight and if I do something wrong could cause an issue. Its still a fun boat, just didnt slide in the turns as I expected... it does in grass and snow though.. I guess Ill just have to build a smaller flatty in the future!
#20
Scrap the Dumas boat and start fresh with something lighter.
I agree with Got RPM. I have looked at those kits and they don't lend themselves well to someone who wants the whole airboat experience. Most of those kits were stamped out over 30 years ago and have sat on shelves in shops for that long.
This is the reason i made my design. The dumas boats will not stand up to the running that i have done over the years.
I agree with Got RPM. I have looked at those kits and they don't lend themselves well to someone who wants the whole airboat experience. Most of those kits were stamped out over 30 years ago and have sat on shelves in shops for that long.
This is the reason i made my design. The dumas boats will not stand up to the running that i have done over the years.
#21
Scrap the Dumas boat and start fresh with something lighter.
I agree with Got RPM. I have looked at those kits and they don't lend themselves well to someone who wants the whole airboat experience. Most of those kits were stamped out over 30 years ago and have sat on shelves in shops for that long.
This is the reason i made my design. The dumas boats will not stand up to the running that i have done over the years.
I agree with Got RPM. I have looked at those kits and they don't lend themselves well to someone who wants the whole airboat experience. Most of those kits were stamped out over 30 years ago and have sat on shelves in shops for that long.
This is the reason i made my design. The dumas boats will not stand up to the running that i have done over the years.