Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Jeti DS-24

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Jeti DS-24

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2017, 11:53 AM
  #351  
CraigG
My Feedback: (40)
 
CraigG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sautee Nacoochee, GA
Posts: 2,092
Received 35 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ravill
I would not have thought, so as the DS-16 doesn't have the 900 mhz transmission capability?

I kind of like that Jeti has that "overkill" feel to it in alot of it's properties.
Agreed. This was in reference to a third 2.4 mhz rx option mentioned earlier which, conceivably could have worked with the DS-16. Apparently not the case.
Old 11-13-2017, 11:58 AM
  #352  
JSF-TC
My Feedback: (2)
 
JSF-TC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 134 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Craig,

As was mentioned previously (maybe on the RCG Jeti thread), you can use a 3rd 2.4GHz Rx in clone mode (receive only, no telemetry downlink) as the 3rd Rx with a DS-16 to get additional antenna coverage, in lieu of the 900MHz/ DS-24 link.

Paul
Old 11-13-2017, 12:54 PM
  #353  
CraigG
My Feedback: (40)
 
CraigG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sautee Nacoochee, GA
Posts: 2,092
Received 35 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JSF-TC
Craig,

As was mentioned previously (maybe on the RCG Jeti thread), you can use a 3rd 2.4GHz Rx in clone mode (receive only, no telemetry downlink) as the 3rd Rx with a DS-16 to get additional antenna coverage, in lieu of the 900MHz/ DS-24 link.

Paul
Actually, it was in the CortexPro thread and the specific example talked about using REX receivers. Not sure if that makes any difference but Esprit told me today that the R3 REX 2.4 is not approved in the U.S. and approval not expected any time soon. In any case, I happy with the two R3/RSW's I've got, and just wish the issue(s) with the CP were settled. Thanks for the input (on both threads).

Craig
Old 11-14-2017, 04:36 AM
  #354  
Dansy
My Feedback: (53)
 
Dansy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Prescott, Ont.
Posts: 2,985
Received 159 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Easy to get from across the pound....just a tiny bit more $ and assist is also available.....
Old 11-14-2017, 07:10 AM
  #355  
wfield0455
My Feedback: (7)
 
wfield0455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holliston, MA
Posts: 1,299
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I still have to ask, why bother. Adding all kinds of junk without fully understanding the system and the failure modes you're trying to deal with just adds expense and rarely works as expected. The bottom line is you either trust the Cortex Pro to work properly or you don't. If you trust it then there is no need for extra junk to try to deal with the Cortex Pro failing. Just install it as recommended with both receivers directly connected to the Cortex Pro. If you don't trust it to work properly, why in the world install it in your airplane in the first place?

Same goes for the 900Mhz link. It can be of great value for dealing with the situation it was designed to help with, interference on the 2.4Ghz link. For a Cortex Pro failure, not so much.

Personally, once the Jeti Assist receivers are available, I'm not sure I see much value in the Cortex pro anymore if you're using a Central Box. Seems far easier to simply use an Assist receiver directly connected to the Central Box and eliminate the connections associated with having an additional unit between the receivers and the Central Box.

Last edited by wfield0455; 11-14-2017 at 07:20 AM.
Old 11-14-2017, 10:51 AM
  #356  
CraigG
My Feedback: (40)
 
CraigG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sautee Nacoochee, GA
Posts: 2,092
Received 35 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wfield0455
I still have to ask, why bother. Adding all kinds of junk without fully understanding the system and the failure modes you're trying to deal with just adds expense and rarely works as expected. The bottom line is you either trust the Cortex Pro to work properly or you don't. If you trust it then there is no need for extra junk to try to deal with the Cortex Pro failing. Just install it as recommended with both receivers directly connected to the Cortex Pro. If you don't trust it to work properly, why in the world install it in your airplane in the first place?

Same goes for the 900Mhz link. It can be of great value for dealing with the situation it was designed to help with, interference on the 2.4Ghz link. For a Cortex Pro failure, not so much.

Personally, once the Jeti Assist receivers are available, I'm not sure I see much value in the Cortex pro anymore if you're using a Central Box. Seems far easier to simply use an Assist receiver directly connected to the Central Box and eliminate the connections associated with having an additional unit between the receivers and the Central Box.
I couldn't agree more Wayne. The only questions with the Jeti assist are if it will produce the same excellent stabilization as the CP and when it will be available. If history is any guide, it may be a long wait.

Craig
Old 11-15-2017, 04:58 AM
  #357  
Nige321
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 121
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

when it will be available. If history is any guide, it may be a long wait.
What wait? Assist Rx are out. I have one in my hand here...
Old 11-15-2017, 05:45 AM
  #358  
CraigG
My Feedback: (40)
 
CraigG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sautee Nacoochee, GA
Posts: 2,092
Received 35 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nige321
What wait? Assist Rx are out. I have one in my hand here...
Congratulations. Perhaps you can give us a report on how its working and how it compares other gyro stabilization products.
Old 11-15-2017, 05:51 AM
  #359  
Nige321
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 121
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CraigG
Congratulations. Perhaps you can give us a report on how its working and how it compares other gyro stabilization products.
I'd love to but earning a living keeps getting in the way!
Old 11-15-2017, 06:01 AM
  #360  
al010964
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Australia, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZB
No we do not have final approval yet, we have pasted tests and we are still in the process of certification.
Our first batch of Jeti DS-24 has been produced and shipped to us. Looks like radios will be sitting here for few more days till we get the sticker. Unfortunately hurricane IRMA set us back by few days.

Zb/Jeti USA
Hi ZB,
Can you advise if there is an issue with one of the tests, as in this post it sounds like the test is through but in one of your more recent posts you mention a 72 hour period and hopefully a difficult and expensive test will be over, fingers crossed.

i really do appreciate the transparency shown and you are giving us more info than any other radio company would provide its customers. But just reading between the lines (possibly incorrectly) Are we looking at some delays that may run us past Xmas?

If so, hey stuff happens and will continue to wait but as we entering our summer in Australia will need to get some kit on order before the Xmas rush, to ride through the delay. I am also making an assumption here that our testing (Australia) is some how linked to the USA certification... which is in itself a little odd as I would have thought we would have been closer to Europe
where some radios seem to be flowing.

thanks in advance,
Adrian
Old 11-15-2017, 06:42 AM
  #361  
wfield0455
My Feedback: (7)
 
wfield0455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holliston, MA
Posts: 1,299
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nige321
What wait? Assist Rx are out. I have one in my hand here...
Never mind, Zb already answered..
Old 11-20-2017, 11:06 AM
  #362  
rbgetz
 
rbgetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

So. I'm hearing news that the DS24 did not pass the FCC? more changes are required?? Is this true?
Old 11-20-2017, 11:14 AM
  #363  
ravill
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (11)
 
ravill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Granite Bay, Ca
Posts: 5,704
Received 90 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Ugh.....

Old 11-20-2017, 11:18 AM
  #364  
ZB
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: , FL
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Unfortunately yes. There will be just one difference, radio will shut down when the charger is attached.
But this requires hardware change.

Zb/Jeti USA

It’s a fight…. Unfortunately after spending the last two months and thousands of dollars we came to the conclusion that we are not able to pass the FCC certification for the long awaited DS-24 transmitter at this time. While we have passed 98% of all requirements we are not able to satisfied all of the tests. While the radio is approved and functioning very well on the European market and the rest of the World, it will require a slight hardware modification in order to satisfy FCC strict requirements. We have the solution, but this hardware change will require some time. We are expecting additional 4-6 weeks delivery delay for our North American customers. We deeply apologize for any inconvenience we have caused to our loyal Jeti customers.

Here is what Jeti USA is ready to offer:
1) We will work with you on a case by case basis to satisfy your needs
2) We can offer 10% discount on any existing DS-16 Radio
3) We can lend you a brand new DS-16 radio system to you keep you flying. Play with it until you get your DS-24.
4) For those who don’t need a loaner radio to get by, we would like to offer a $100.00 Gift Certificate for your inconvenience

Last edited by ZB; 11-20-2017 at 11:28 AM.
Old 11-20-2017, 12:42 PM
  #365  
luv2flyrc
My Feedback: (6)
 
luv2flyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mississauga, ON, CANADA
Posts: 1,694
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Just curious, why did you not have that issue when you FCC'd the DC-24 or the 16's for that matter?
Old 11-20-2017, 01:06 PM
  #366  
afterburner
My Feedback: (18)
 
afterburner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New City, NY
Posts: 3,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ravill
Ugh.....


Ouch! Good thing you work in the medical field!
Old 11-21-2017, 07:24 AM
  #367  
kirkj
My Feedback: (61)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: spring, TX
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

..

Last edited by kirkj; 12-01-2017 at 12:29 PM.
Old 11-24-2017, 11:52 AM
  #368  
gapellegrini
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SP, BRAZIL
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

DS-24 arrived in Brazil.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2961.JPG
Views:	122
Size:	2.32 MB
ID:	2246107  
Old 11-24-2017, 11:12 PM
  #369  
marksp
My Feedback: (9)
 
marksp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 888
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Right on!
Old 11-25-2017, 07:49 AM
  #370  
roydefiant
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Eden Prairie, MN,
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Great question about FCC and the DC24 vs DS24
Old 11-25-2017, 08:03 AM
  #371  
bobl2
My Feedback: (14)
 
bobl2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roydefiant
Great question about FCC and the DC24 vs DS24
It is a good question that I would like answered too.
Old 11-25-2017, 01:43 PM
  #372  
F1 Rocket
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bobl2
It is a good question that I would like answered too.
They are pretty much completely different radios. Only the software is common.
Old 11-25-2017, 04:18 PM
  #373  
AV8ATOR
My Feedback: (5)
 
AV8ATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

What I was told the DC has a bigger board lots of room. Thus making it harder to fit all the same electronic hardware on the smaller DS radio board.
Old 11-27-2017, 04:27 PM
  #374  
roydefiant
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Eden Prairie, MN,
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

So what is the major firmware issue that allowed the DC24 to pass but flunked the DS24?
Old 11-28-2017, 04:27 AM
  #375  
wfield0455
My Feedback: (7)
 
wfield0455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Holliston, MA
Posts: 1,299
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roydefiant
So what is the major firmware issue that allowed the DC24 to pass but flunked the DS24?
Not sure why people think that because the DC24 and the DS24 run the same firmware that has anything to do with one passing FCC certification and the other not. This is a hardware issue and the DC24 and the DS24 have lots of differences with completely different board layouts different transmit antenna placements, etc. Small changes in ANYTHING internally can have HUGE impacts during certification. The DC24 passed FCC and there is no reason to assume that anyone "missed something", the DS24 didn't and needs a minor change to pass. It's as simple as that.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.