Community
Search
Notices
"1/2 A" & "1/8 A" airplanes These are the small ones...more popular now than ever.

RC Bee Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2004, 11:49 AM
  #1  
cortacesped
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Puerto San Martin, ARGENTINA
Posts: 276
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RC Bee Performance

My question is what kind of performance can I get from this engine. ie: like a Babe Bee, better (don´t believe) or worst. I want to know because I have the oportunity to buy one of this. (not in good condition as the picture) thanks

Claudio
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Nl29666.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	14.4 KB
ID:	108057  
Old 03-05-2004, 08:13 PM
  #2  
jboy381-RCU
Senior Member
 
jboy381-RCU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Creedmoor , NC
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: RC Bee Performance

that is a dragonfly .049...i have one,but i haven't ran it because i need the line that goes to the clunk in the tank...mine was dryrotten...

john
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Hf98886.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	45.5 KB
ID:	108222  
Old 03-08-2004, 03:11 PM
  #3  
DesignMan
 
DesignMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cerritos, CA
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: RC Bee Performance

The engine with the red tank is an RC Bee, not the Dragonfly. The RC Bee used a die-cast zinc crankcase that isn't compatible with any other C*x engine. The tank tooling was salvaged a few years later to produce the Dragonfly that used the conventional extruded/screw-machined crankcase.

The Dragonfly makes an excellent RC sport engine, as was intended, but the venturi is too large for it to draw fuel well for CL stunt work.

A remarkable variety of tubing of various materials can be had at smallparts.com, including Viton, which is gas and diesel fuel proof, while still being very flexible (and ungodly expensive!)
Old 03-08-2004, 08:12 PM
  #4  
jboy381-RCU
Senior Member
 
jboy381-RCU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Creedmoor , NC
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: RC Bee Performance

i stand corrected... thanks designman

i'll look up that smallparts.com to see what they have..

john
Old 03-08-2004, 09:46 PM
  #5  
chogg
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Forsyth, GA
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: RC Bee Performance

My rc bee engine ran quite well. I have many coxes. the tee dees seem to be the most difficult for me , probably because I never tried to pressurize the fuel tank. I liked the red tank/mount but they seem to fail to suck fuel.
Old 03-09-2004, 12:03 AM
  #6  
DesignMan
 
DesignMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cerritos, CA
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: RC Bee Performance

That red tank/mount for the TDs was a real abortion. It didn't quite fit the holes for the Babe Bee/Black Widow mount, but was close enough that you couldn't have both sets of holes. It had inverted mounting, but there was no way to position the tank so the pickup was on the centerline. Useless piece of junk for anything other than hanging on a glider to tow it up.

I could never get them to spring the bucks to tool up something useful. Mind you, the Norvel tank has many of the same problems. Yet another case of failing to study history...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.