Not the best photos...
#3
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Not the best photos...
Dave, I just scaled down the full size plans and built it out of balsa. So, yes, fully symmetrical airfoil. I sprayed it with Brodak dope. Let me fly it first and I may be willing to let it go. I can't decide whether to make it fly sort of fast with an AME .061 or make it into a rocket with a Norvel .074!
#6
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Russell, PA
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Not the best photos...
rainedave;
Very nice job! Always been one of my favorites from the older days.
Couple of questions, how is the ballance? Some of these are known for being tail heavy. Also, are you going for landing gear, or the old tried 1/2a skid?
I have the Global plan scaled down to 36", it shows a built up tail group. Are those on the Birdy you have there built up or sheet? How is the weight?
Super looking so far!
Very nice job! Always been one of my favorites from the older days.
Couple of questions, how is the ballance? Some of these are known for being tail heavy. Also, are you going for landing gear, or the old tried 1/2a skid?
I have the Global plan scaled down to 36", it shows a built up tail group. Are those on the Birdy you have there built up or sheet? How is the weight?
Super looking so far!
#7
Senior Member
RE: Not the best photos...
I had the kit and never built it because the tail feathers were solid sheet. Add to that the wood was not very light. I could not see any way it would not come out tail heavy and then wind up with what I was estimating about 2 ounces of nose ballast. []
If I remember correctly it was 3/16" thick balsa! No wonder it had such a reputation!
I wish I still had the thing. I could easily replace the wood and add lightening holes to boot. Still might be better to just build them up with sticks.
Dave, Beautiful plane!
Robert
If I remember correctly it was 3/16" thick balsa! No wonder it had such a reputation!
I wish I still had the thing. I could easily replace the wood and add lightening holes to boot. Still might be better to just build them up with sticks.
Dave, Beautiful plane!
Robert
#10
RE: Not the best photos...
The plane is a Joe Bridi design that was published in RC Modeler magazine in June of '75. Specs were 64-1/4" span, 688 sq. in., .60, 5 ch., built-up balsa and plywood.
#11
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Not the best photos...
Thanks for the comments. I love building scaled down replicas of famous airplanes. .020 Replica was always my favorite SAM category (which reminds me, I have a 36" Peerless Panther that I should convert to r/c).
My DB is actually built to the .60 size plans: built-up stab with ribs and then sheeted with 1/32" balsa.
With the engine in the nose, all servos and pushrods installed and the 370mah NiMH pack (1oz) right behind the tank (at the fuselage former next to the wing LE) it balances dead on and weighs 17.75oz. The Berg Mircostamp rx will probably bring it up to 18oz even.
The only changes I made were a hollow balsa shell canopy and no landing gear (although I installed gear blocks and ply rib doublers in the wing if I ever do add gear). Other than that, it's just like the full scale version, including the microballon wing fillets. Bridi never over-engineered his planes, so using light wood and going to the smaller rather than the larger scaled wood dimensions results in a pretty light model. For example, when I scaled down the plans a spar might end up .3125" thick. Instead of going up to .375 (3/8) I'll go down to .25 (1/4).
I will fly it first - hopefully next week - with the AME .061. This engine is at least 2 to 2.5K stronger than my AP Wasp which flies my 1lb Sun Fli IV just fine. If I feel it's under powered (which I doubt I will) I made the nose big enough for the Norvel .074 to drop right in. I'll just need to move the rx pack back an inch or two.
My DB is actually built to the .60 size plans: built-up stab with ribs and then sheeted with 1/32" balsa.
With the engine in the nose, all servos and pushrods installed and the 370mah NiMH pack (1oz) right behind the tank (at the fuselage former next to the wing LE) it balances dead on and weighs 17.75oz. The Berg Mircostamp rx will probably bring it up to 18oz even.
The only changes I made were a hollow balsa shell canopy and no landing gear (although I installed gear blocks and ply rib doublers in the wing if I ever do add gear). Other than that, it's just like the full scale version, including the microballon wing fillets. Bridi never over-engineered his planes, so using light wood and going to the smaller rather than the larger scaled wood dimensions results in a pretty light model. For example, when I scaled down the plans a spar might end up .3125" thick. Instead of going up to .375 (3/8) I'll go down to .25 (1/4).
I will fly it first - hopefully next week - with the AME .061. This engine is at least 2 to 2.5K stronger than my AP Wasp which flies my 1lb Sun Fli IV just fine. If I feel it's under powered (which I doubt I will) I made the nose big enough for the Norvel .074 to drop right in. I'll just need to move the rx pack back an inch or two.
#13
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Russell, PA
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Not the best photos...
rainedave;
Hope you post some photos of it when you are going to fly , really is a good looking plane.
These were made into kits for 1/2a size by a few companys, was even a ARTF with a fiberglass fuse! A foam wing version, and SurFlite(?) had a all built up kit , i think that one had the sheet balsa tail group.
Those were the 1/2a days, and it's good to see them still being born.
Hope you post some photos of it when you are going to fly , really is a good looking plane.
These were made into kits for 1/2a size by a few companys, was even a ARTF with a fiberglass fuse! A foam wing version, and SurFlite(?) had a all built up kit , i think that one had the sheet balsa tail group.
Those were the 1/2a days, and it's good to see them still being born.
#17
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Russell, PA
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Not the best photos...
Lookin Good!
Try and get a few in flight shots, would like to see them. Your colors made me think of the Bengals!
I noted before you were going full house, that was the reason on the landing gear question. The old days, these were mostly dead stick landings. This would be perfect for small retracts.
Kewl !!
Try and get a few in flight shots, would like to see them. Your colors made me think of the Bengals!
I noted before you were going full house, that was the reason on the landing gear question. The old days, these were mostly dead stick landings. This would be perfect for small retracts.
Kewl !!
#18
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Not the best photos...
After flying my 16oz Sun Fli five or six times yesterday with it's AP Wasp, I decided that the AME .061 just won't do on the DB. Today I installed the Norvel .074.
AUW is about 21oz with a wing loading of 12.9oz. I've never flown an .074 before, so how do you think this plane will perform given those numbers? Thanks.
AUW is about 21oz with a wing loading of 12.9oz. I've never flown an .074 before, so how do you think this plane will perform given those numbers? Thanks.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Glendale,
AZ
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Not the best photos...
Hi David - I can't wait to see how your mini DB flies with an .074. Speaking of Norvel .061's and .074's, there is a post in the Vintage forum from 12/31/06 entitled "Which Engine" and the guy is asking about which engine to use in a plane called "Impulse" from a set of MAN plans. I suggested that he repost it in this forum as you guys have much more experience than I do with Norvel's on small planes. The Impulse is kind of a shoulder wing Falcon 56ish looking trainer ('cept tail dragger) with an AUW of 26 oz, 46" ws and 12.3 oz/ft^2. I told him that the .074 Norvel (if he can get one) would probably be ok. Hope I didn't give him an inaccurate reply. I mentioned you and da Crew as a source for good 1/2A info. Again, this is posted in the Vintage forum.
Oh, and even though I'm in AZ, can I be a member of the CC sorta like a Southwest representative? Other than me and my Dad there isn't really enough interest out here in 1/2A to start an AZ Crew - just me, my Dad and a lot of hungery cactus!
Thanks - Todd
Oh, and even though I'm in AZ, can I be a member of the CC sorta like a Southwest representative? Other than me and my Dad there isn't really enough interest out here in 1/2A to start an AZ Crew - just me, my Dad and a lot of hungery cactus!
Thanks - Todd
#21
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Not the best photos...
Todd, that sounds about right for the .074.
The DB is more or less ready to fly. Man, was I lucky with this one. The blue tape on the wings marks the CG according to the plans. With the battery in place it balances dead on the tape. This rarely ever happens with my models. Two ounces of fuel will put it on the safe side for the first flight.
The DB is more or less ready to fly. Man, was I lucky with this one. The blue tape on the wings marks the CG according to the plans. With the battery in place it balances dead on the tape. This rarely ever happens with my models. Two ounces of fuel will put it on the safe side for the first flight.