ORIGINAL: 804
ORIGINAL: rcplanenut
If you look at my first post you will see that I have stated my problem. Someone in our club has proposed a rule change to ban/limit 3D flying. This has been tried before in the past at our club. Since there was no definition for 3D it would be difficult to enforce this rule because there would be many different inturpratations of what 3D is( so which one's are right and which one's are wrong). I am trying to get this rule change voted down, just as I did in the past.
My definition of 3D is ''keeping the plane in the air when it is going too slow to keep it in the air''
Really, the standard definition I've always heard and used is flying on a stalled wing.
The most common 3D moves are hover, harrier, rolling harrier, and some spins, and combinations of
all of the above.
If the members are so nit-picky they can't decide what is 3D and what is not,
you guys have more problems than just this.
Good luck.
Dang, 804, you're right and succinct in your definition
AFAIK, but............
OP doesn't want a club anti-3D rule. As I understand it what's keeping the club OFs from banning 3D is they don't know how to define it. Ergo, I propose your definition of 3D should be replaced with "flying around in circles."