ORIGINAL: apwachholz
@Bradpaul -
You are correct. I did start that additional thread as you mentioned. As a matter of fact I've started several threads on RCU and will continue to do so.
They are all under the guise of conversing with my fellow hobbyists about topics that are important to me. And I'm trying to find out how important they are to you. I'm not attempting to raise eyebrows or start fires. I'm simply trying to gain insight from you all.
However, thanks for noticing my threads. I hope you reply.... [img][/img]
<div>@K-Bob</div><div> </div><div>''Well, you have received a small sample. So far I would say you stand pretty much alone in your beliefs.''</div><div> </div><div>I don't think I do.</div><div> </div><div>Bob, what you might be misconstruing about what I'm saying is an understanding that I want hard and fast rules on our hobby. As a matter of fact I don't. However, in order to avoid conflict or issues with the FAA, I believe it's best to put some things in place before something happens and then we really get locked down. </div><div> </div><div>Times have changed and now more then ever we need to have a continued dialogue with the FAA. We're too closely tied to them thanks to improved technology (which is good!) so by natural progression we’ll begin to walk the line of falling under their jurisdiction; at some small level.</div><div> </div><div>Interestingly enough, the Gen Av. community in the wake of 9/11 had very hard and fast rules applied instantly, much to their distain. However, as things progressed and AOPA worked with the FAA, rules were lifted and freedoms regained. This is what the AMA is working towards however; the support from underneath them (i.e. us) is somewhat lack-luster from what I've been experiencing thus far.</div><div> </div><div>@jonkoppisch</div><div> </div><div>''If you feel this way, I think you should be lobbying the ama or even by starting at your local club for those regs''</div><div> </div><div>I am currently a Team Lead member of the Strategic Task Force reviewed and assembled by the AMA whose sole objectives are to increase our AMA memberships and impact within our communities. One of our current tasks is reviewing AMA sanctioned clubs and how to better involve them and grow memberships and increase visibility.</div><div> </div><div> I am indeed active in what I am passionate about.</div><div> </div>
Here's my rub. The OP is a Team Leader of the "Strategic Task Force". I've been an officer in our club for 3 years and have never even heard of this task force. I wish the AMA was better with communication when it comes with stuff like this.They don't seem to work as well with smaller clubs and it seems like they should be working closer with all the clubs especially on this issue. What makes this guy qualified to lead any kind of task force? From what I've read here thus far I don't think he represents my interests or as far as I can tell any one of my club members interests.
We also had some e-mail exchanges with AMA reps that re-iterated some of the material posted by Bird of Paradise. To sum it up in a nutshell we were basically told we have to see what the FAA was going to come up with and if it wasn't conducive to model aviation the AMA will mobilize the membership and act accordingly. Our thoughts were that the AMA should be mobilizing now, take a more proactive stance than to wait and be reactive to the FAA's plans. I'm worried about playing a wait and see game.