RE: Redesign and reconstruction of the Oldest Taurus on Earth
Gents,
“A complete failure is not a good begin”
New toys, short note about the value.
The Cream Puff pictures do have remarkable different points of view (is ‘camera location’), see the picture. The more pictures can be involved in a reconstruction process the more accurate is the result. Also the more different the equivalent angles of identical points of the plane the better the result. This all seems to be a reasonable compensation for the lower grade of detailing of the Cream Puff..
Also interesting is the fact there are two pictures with nearly same camera location but different camera height, 3 heigh position, 5 low position.
Highest of all scores is still for the crate picture, highest accuracy, which is several Mb’s. and the reference dimensions of the crate.
Lowest score for accuracy is still for the Flop, (fuselage) contours because I still have the limited account of two pictures. Overall dimensions still arel very accurate as result of the quality and dimensions of the “big picture”.
For all pictures there is one very big profit, airplanes are symmetrical objects see the yellow lines, a/b that can be used in calculations.
The result of all projects has to be the plane fits with highest accuracy in the complete set of compare pictures.
On the picture below we see a 2 D presentation, of course the real process is going with 3D, silhouettes, recognizable details etc For all it’s important to analyze the pictures first because.
"there is no way back!"
More to come,
Cees