ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R
Or in the real world one in possession of the facts would see that my involvement saved the defendant's insurance company from paying a claim to a person whose injuries were a direct result of their own willful negligence and dangerous actions. But at any rate, you've crossed a line so I am pretty much done with you. Perhaps that was your intent to provoke me, who knows. But I'm done here.
Ok, your not going to admit that any judgement would also fall on AMA in this situation... Doesn't California law require the insurance of AMA, secondary or not, to subrogate equally in a finding of liability such as this might have been?