deleted
04-13-2011 | 06:14 PM
#177
RE: If rules change, will you honor new rules?
ORIGINAL: cj_rumley
I'm pleased to hear you have made that choice.
ORIGINAL: Fili
internet trolls... why I'm rarely here anymore.
internet trolls... why I'm rarely here anymore.
04-13-2011 | 06:46 PM
#178
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Aguanga,
CA
RE: If rules change, will you honor new rules?
ORIGINAL: Fili
How clearly you make my point
ORIGINAL: cj_rumley
I'm pleased to hear you have made that choice.
ORIGINAL: Fili
internet trolls... why I'm rarely here anymore.
internet trolls... why I'm rarely here anymore.
04-13-2011 | 07:48 PM
#179
RE: If rules change, will you honor new rules?
ORIGINAL: WestCoastFlyer
Silent, you're very knowledgeable regarding the AMA and AMA insurance - historically have AMA insurance claims been denied when a safety code violation was involved?
Silent, you're very knowledgeable regarding the AMA and AMA insurance - historically have AMA insurance claims been denied when a safety code violation was involved?
We should not fool ourselves and rely on speculation of whether or not a claim might be denied based on a SC violation...that would be a very ridiculous notion to think it could not be IMO based on what I have learned.
04-13-2011 | 08:45 PM
#180
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (40)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alexandria, MN
RE: If rules change, will you honor new rules?
Not sure that I am completely throwing in the towel.The remaining content of the threadmay continue cycling since there are severalrepeatvisitors readily willing to asses and post.As RCUKen said however,,,threads don't always turn out the way the OP had intended. That was certainly the case here. The original poll question was stupid, plain and simple. It wasmeant to be cynical (spelling) with a skosh of humor, not disrespectful as was pointed out by several posts. My apologies to anyone offended by post comments.
<span style="font-size: x-small">
</span>
<span style="font-size: x-small">Thanks, Cletus - appreciate your comments.</span>
<span style="font-size: x-small">
</span>
<span style="font-size: x-small">Thanks, Cletus - appreciate your comments.</span>
04-13-2011 | 09:03 PM
#181
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (40)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alexandria, MN
RE: If rules change, will you honor new rules?
I edited to offset damage the original questioned posed. This thread was a bust.
RCKen removed the smoldering ashes left behind by several trolls - thread trolls arescum , plain and simple.
RCKen removed the smoldering ashes left behind by several trolls - thread trolls arescum , plain and simple.
04-14-2011 | 03:33 AM
#182
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: newbury,
OH
RE: If rules change, will you honor new rules?
cy rumley,
If not for anarchy, you would be subjects of a monarchy in his/her colony. Careful what you wish for............
If not for anarchy, you would be subjects of a monarchy in his/her colony. Careful what you wish for............
According to Websters online:
Anarchy... "a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority" .
Revolution...."a fundamental change in political organization; especially : the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed"
"Revolutionists" are what made the US what it is today. I believe in questioning the government, and sometimes changing it...BUT "anarchy" is a lawless society. Biggest man, biggest gun rules. I'm not for that...People need some sort of government in order to be civilized, otherwise "anarchy" will rule...
04-14-2011 | 06:42 AM
#183
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Aguanga,
CA
RE: If rules change, will you honor new rules?
ORIGINAL: tinner1
I would like to clarify something for you, I am for revolution but NOT anarchy...
According to Websters online:
Anarchy... ''a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority'' .
Revolution....''a fundamental change in political organization; especially : the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed''
''Revolutionists'' are what made the US what it is today. I believe in questioning the government, and sometimes changing it...BUT ''anarchy'' is a lawless society. Biggest man, biggest gun rules. I'm not for that...People need some sort of government in order to be civilized, otherwise ''anarchy'' will rule...
cy rumley,
If not for anarchy, you would be subjects of a monarchy in his/her colony. Careful what you wish for............
If not for anarchy, you would be subjects of a monarchy in his/her colony. Careful what you wish for............
According to Websters online:
Anarchy... ''a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority'' .
Revolution....''a fundamental change in political organization; especially : the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed''
''Revolutionists'' are what made the US what it is today. I believe in questioning the government, and sometimes changing it...BUT ''anarchy'' is a lawless society. Biggest man, biggest gun rules. I'm not for that...People need some sort of government in order to be civilized, otherwise ''anarchy'' will rule...
There is some ambiguity in the term, so you have to consider the usage. In context, it appeared to have been applied to 3 out of 4 of the respondents to the poll. I think this meaning (from Wiki) fits better: "Most often, the term "anarchy" describes the simple absence of publicly recognized government or enforced political authority." I doubt that the folks referred to are intent on revolution, but are simply questioning authority and saying they may chose to not recognize it. Maybe my use of a particular example was inappropriate, as in that instance anarchy led to revolution.
04-14-2011 | 05:03 PM
#184
My Feedback: (22)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
RE: If rules change, will you honor new rules?
ORIGINAL: cj_rumley
Tinner-
There is some ambiguity in the term, so you have to consider the usage. In context, it appeared to have been applied to 3 out of 4 of the respondents to the poll. I think this meaning (from Wiki) fits better: ''Most often, the term ''anarchy'' describes the simple absence of publicly recognized government or enforced political authority.'' I doubt that the folks referred to are intent on revolution, but are simply questioning authority and saying they may chose to not recognize it. Maybe my use of a particular example was inappropriate, as in that instance anarchy led to revolution.
ORIGINAL: tinner1
I would like to clarify something for you, I am for revolution but NOT anarchy...
According to Websters online:
Anarchy... ''a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority'' .
Revolution....''a fundamental change in political organization; especially : the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed''
''Revolutionists'' are what made the US what it is today. I believe in questioning the government, and sometimes changing it...BUT ''anarchy'' is a lawless society. Biggest man, biggest gun rules. I'm not for that...People need some sort of government in order to be civilized, otherwise ''anarchy'' will rule...
cy rumley,
If not for anarchy, you would be subjects of a monarchy in his/her colony. Careful what you wish for............
If not for anarchy, you would be subjects of a monarchy in his/her colony. Careful what you wish for............
According to Websters online:
Anarchy... ''a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority'' .
Revolution....''a fundamental change in political organization; especially : the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed''
''Revolutionists'' are what made the US what it is today. I believe in questioning the government, and sometimes changing it...BUT ''anarchy'' is a lawless society. Biggest man, biggest gun rules. I'm not for that...People need some sort of government in order to be civilized, otherwise ''anarchy'' will rule...
There is some ambiguity in the term, so you have to consider the usage. In context, it appeared to have been applied to 3 out of 4 of the respondents to the poll. I think this meaning (from Wiki) fits better: ''Most often, the term ''anarchy'' describes the simple absence of publicly recognized government or enforced political authority.'' I doubt that the folks referred to are intent on revolution, but are simply questioning authority and saying they may chose to not recognize it. Maybe my use of a particular example was inappropriate, as in that instance anarchy led to revolution.
I guess anarchist can make up their own definitions.
