cy rumley,
If not for anarchy, you would be subjects of a monarchy in his/her colony. Careful what you wish for............
I would like to clarify something for you, I am for revolution but NOT anarchy...
According to Websters online:
Anarchy... "a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority" .
Revolution...."a fundamental change in political organization; especially : the overthrow or renunciation of one government or ruler and the substitution of another by the governed"
"Revolutionists" are what made the US what it is today. I believe in questioning the government, and sometimes changing it...BUT "anarchy" is a lawless society. Biggest man, biggest gun rules. I'm not for that...People need some sort of government in order to be civilized, otherwise "anarchy" will rule...