RCU Forums - View Single Post - Whats wrong with this picture?
View Single Post
Old 10-03-2011 | 06:38 PM
  #4  
KidEpoxy's Avatar
KidEpoxy
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Antonio, TX
Default RE: Whats wrong with this picture?

interesting

lets look back and see what declarations have been made about club fields and muncie:

http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=10022934
And to take it one step farther, the AMA really does nothing with a club's flying site beyond providing a certificate of insurance for the field owner if requested and paid for by the club. The AMA does not inspect, approve, or have any oversight of a field. There are suggested field layouts, but clubs are under no requirement to use them.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=9588872
Just for clarification, the AMA really does not have any actual flying site rules. The membership manual (cited above) contains some general field guidelines to aid clubs or individuals in setting up fields, but there is no AMA requirement that they be used.

AMA does not sanction, approve, inspect, or have any oversight on RC flying fields. The one and only requirement that even comes close is requiring clubs within a short distance of each other to work out a frequency sharing plan. And that's it.
although,
some folks dont agree with that,
apparently the folks that put up that sign for instance