RCU Forums - View Single Post - Radio Systems for 3D
View Single Post
Old 12-10-2011 | 07:56 PM
  #10  
ThumbSkull's Avatar
ThumbSkull
Senior Member
My Feedback: (57)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Greenwood, IN
Default RE: Radio Systems for 3D


ORIGINAL: zacharyR

ORIGINAL: ThumbSkull

The analog throttle trim is one of the reasons I got the x9503.
It's much faster and more intuitive than the digital bump buttons.

I'm sorry but that's just bull****

My Digital trim's i can change the trim's scaling ( IE The amount of travel one single bump equals ) it's clearly superior to t he analog .... and i don't want to re trim my gas engine ideal ... also there's probably some safety to not having a constantly re do the ideal on a giant scale plane
I really don't understand your statement sounds like your arguing it's superior to digi trim's ?

.. srsly am i the only one who See's analog throttle trim as a horrible idea ??



and really all the planes you own you want to re trim' the idel Evey time you change model's ??????????????????????????????????????????????????

and what happen's if the trim move's when the raido's powerd off ???? and it's super easyer to know you move the trim and the amount of trim that you move'ed by hearing the bump trim beep...
another nice thing if you can see the numbric vaule of your trim.. the analog thing you have to do some guessing by eye balling it where it should be... right ?

please give me a example... and maybe I'm wrong... I'm refering to more intitive ...

I have 8 nitro birds and 3 electric set-up on that radio.

I don't have to re-adjust between models. They are all set-up the same.

Kill is at full down position, good idle is set about mid-way.

I don't have to listen for the beep for mid-point.
It doesn't take 30 bumps to get from one position to the other (or hold the button and wait for the long beep).
It's just easier to me.

I do like the digital buttons on all the other controls.