RCU Forums - View Single Post - Radio Systems for 3D
View Single Post
Old 12-11-2011 | 03:58 PM
  #16  
MetallicaJunkie's Avatar
MetallicaJunkie
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,464
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Donna, TX
Default RE: Radio Systems for 3D

ORIGINAL: zacharyR

ORIGINAL: ThumbSkull

The analog throttle trim is one of the reasons I got the x9503.
It's much faster and more intuitive than the digital bump buttons.

I'm sorry but that's just bull****

My Digital trim's i can change the trim's scaling ( IE The amount of travel one single bump equals ) it's clearly superior to t he analog .... and i don't want to re trim my gas engine ideal ... also there's probably some safety to not having a constantly re do the ideal on a giant scale plane
I really don't understand your statement sounds like your arguing it's superior to digi trim's ?

.. srsly am i the only one who See's analog throttle trim as a horrible idea ??



and really all the planes you own you want to re trim' the idel Evey time you change model's ?????????????????????????????????????????????????

and what happen's if the trim move's when the raido's powerd off ???? and it's super easyer to know you move the trim and the amount of trim that you move'ed by hearing the bump trim beep...
another nice thing if you can see the numbric vaule of your trim.. the analog thing you have to do some guessing by eye balling it where it should be... right ?

please give me a example... and maybe I'm wrong... I'm refering to more intitive ...

why dont you make a poll in the the gas motor section... if not i will

i prefer analog my self.... i set all my idles to be low and steady at half trim... when im flying i usually keep it at 3/4 trim...time to land i bring it back to half trim... i land and kill the motor with trim all the way down... im so used to it.... im sure i could adapt a method if i had dital trim...but im glad i dont own a radio with it on the throttle