RCU Forums - View Single Post - Throttle servo too close to ignition?
View Single Post
Old 07-26-2012 | 09:04 PM
  #14  
djmp69
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 371
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Chitown, IL
Default RE: Throttle servo too close to ignition?



[/quote]
If you've already made up your mind, why are you here asking questions?

Like I said, use the search engine or continue with the course of action you've already decided on.
[/quote]

I am not a know it all, nor do I or will I pretend to be, especially by berating someone who doesn't know everything there is to know about something is seeking answers of substance instead of snippy worthless comments as yours. If you read my original posts, even though I figured a way to do things, I still would like to know what other people do, what solutions have worked, not worked, etc. If you also read what I wrote earlier, you would see that I am seeking what is outside of what Iknow. What Iknow is all I can go on, but I am not so stuck on myself that Ithink that what Iknow is all there is. Ialso don't like to just know an answer, Ilike to know the reasoning behind the answer so that Ican actually learn, and know what I'm talking about or doing. I'm not just going to simply do something just because someone says to do it. As Isaid before, Ihave WITNESSED erratic throttle behavior in LOTSof planes when the servo was that close to the ignition and/or switch, and the problem went away when the servo was moved. In every single case. Yes, the majority of these situations was with a 2.4 system (Futaba, JR, didn't matter), and current engines. Or were you too engrossed in your search engine to read that?

Not to mention, EVERYengine and servo/recevier manufacturer clearly states the 12" rule in the instructions. By the way, if you have successfully produced a run of engines, servos or receivers,by all means, point me to them, or give me a keyword to use in your suggested search engine, and I'll gladly consider your product...

That said, I want to thank everyone ELSEwho provided substantial answers and opinions that actually addressed my question (which I apologize Iknow has been asked time and time again). Those of you that went further to offer actual solutions, or reasonings behind your solutions have helped greatly by giving me more insight to why the servo placement is usually no longer an issue.

Those of you that assumed that I ONLY came here, didn't use a search engine, or just simply feel that Iwasted your time, well, Iwon't apologize. Ask me, you wasted your own time writing such pompous and worthless responses, thereby getting into a discussion and writing that you're "not going to get into it AGAIN". Wow, talk about the attention span of a sparrow...