RCU Forums - View Single Post - Governing Body For Classic Pattern
View Single Post
Old 12-28-2012 | 04:45 PM
  #5  
EscapeFlyer's Avatar
EscapeFlyer
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Brooklyn Center, MN
Default RE: Governing Body For Classic Pattern

In terms of governing body for classic pattern airplane flying as a whole, there is none. There are different organizations under the label of classic pattern. It is a misconception to think one potential SIG or group will be "THE" governing body for classic pattern as a whole.

The SPA, like Scott says, is their own organization. Their sole authority lies within the SPA boundaries.

The same applies to my interest.. the CPA.

The same applies to the NECPO.

These are the three out there I am familiar with at this moment.

What may happen in the future is that a membership may grow and become the mainstream, deciding which is largest, and they would usually have the honor in setting a precedent- but not purpose to destroy another organization, or setting "THE" precedent. Having choices is a good thing. But that is how all things come into being.

These organizations themselves may choose, or choose not to have a list of "legal" pattern airplanes, rule cycles, designer classes, etc. As of this time, no one organization has the monopoly to classic pattern. I don't even think that would be a good thing.

In terms of Nats... Everything is in a state of evolution at this point. I am excited to see that the mixed AMA and Non-turnaround flying has been primarily using CPA cycles. I would only say for certain that these choices are decided by the host, or the CD of the event, and not enforced by any one organization.


I write this especially to emphasize that a SIG does not indicate dictoral rule for all other classes. Just because the SPA is a SIG, that does not mean they enforce their rules on the CPA, NECPO, etc... nor can they.

Just because the Classic Pattern Association is courting SIG status, this does not mean the CPA will force ourselves and our rules on every other organization.

A SIG sets you apart from other similar AMA events in your area as yours in the event there may be two or more similar events overlapping each other and interfearing with participation at either event.


With that said, I am pleased a s punch to participate in an organization putting the options available to the voting membership. There has been some great things changing within the CPA because of the desires from within the organization. The leadership has listened and made choices available that have been asked for.

I also like the CPA because the focus is on the classic pattern airplane designs flying the classic pattern cycles, and the people are amazing! I have friends now in areas of the country I would never had met if it wasn't for the CPA.

Obviously I am motivated to see the CPA become as big and as amazing as anything could be. But I cannot force that on anyone. It is growing on the sole basis that it is fun! It is fun to fly the old pattern! And people are seeing how fun it is to fly a well trimmed airplane, and they want to fly the classics!


Brian